Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

It has nothing to do with the cost and it never should be. You send in your best asset to do that kind of work. Yes a B-52H can also do the mission, but it has a radar cross section the size of a barn door and consequently it is at risk. Libyan air defences might be old, but anyone can get a lucky shot off. Why give the enemy any chance to down and capture Aircrew?

This is no different to any other conflict that the US has been involved in. The B-2 was even used in Afghanistan in 2001 to take out the air assets and old Soviet era SAM and radar networks still in Taliban hands. It is designed to be used and not sidelined simply to save money. Let the professionals get on with their job rather than worrying about cost.


161 posted on 03/24/2011 11:09:42 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Tommyjo

Have it your way. I can understand your desire to see the best in this, but I still maintain it is the wrong thing to use it and to even be in this ‘kinetic military action’ to begin with.

If you’re going after radar guided SAMs, you use an ARM, a HARM or an ARGM, heck, even a SLCM if the location is fixed.

Libya’s SA-2s, 3s and 5s aren’t much of a challenge unless they’ve been upgraded, and the assorted MANPADs (which are altitude limited). If the 100+ CMs we shot didn’t get them, the what the hell did we pay all that money for them?


162 posted on 03/24/2011 12:28:56 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson