Posted on 03/16/2011 6:25:47 AM PDT by hc87
Thank you for the additional info. I was going from (poor) memory.
Unit 1 - 460 MW
Unit 2 - 760 MW
Unit 3 - 760 MW - MOX Fuel
Unit 4 - 760 MW
Unit 5 - 760 MW
Unit 6 - 1067 MW
Status chart:
I think you’ll find those are the MWe output ratings for the units.
Once complete reactor integrity is breached, the cool-down-over-time factor is no longer operative. Eventually the heat will compromise the integrity of the rods, the precise geometric relationship between the fuel and control rods is lost, and you are on your way to a melt down. There are remedies including the boron injection, which is an attempt to make the water surrounding the failing rods into a control rod equivalent.
We are told that in the event of a meltdown, the mass will pool at the bottom of the 3rd stage containment building, spread out and naturally cool over time. Radiation will be emitted but particles will not. And that's the good news!
Someone posted a cutout diagram of the BWR when the discussion was about losing the first sacrificial roof of the outer containment structure (3rd level containment). At the time, I and a few others saw the spent fuel pools situated well up in the structure and asked the question "what about Bob?" Well, that is turning out to be the billion dollar question.
The spent fuel pools are uncontained and subject to all the problems occurring outside the pressure vessel that is doing its level best to keep the unspent fuel rods in their shut down status. Fire in the 3rd containment - did I say that meant the 4 walled structure around the reactor, the ones that lost their roof - might not hurt the first two containment structures but the unprotected spent fuel pool? Oh mama, there's the problem and we've heard precious little about that kettle of neutrons.
I am not a nuc nor did I sleep at a Holiday Inn last night. I am remaining clam but am more than a little concerned that not enough people see the elephant in the outer containment zone. I pray that the folks on the ground see it but are too busy to talk about it.
http://www.jaea.go.jp/english/misc/online-info.shtml
Radiation monitoring online.
The O-Arai location is, as best I can tell, halfway between the plants and Tokyo.
Units are Zgy/hr- don’t know what the “z” means.
“Last measurement collected 2011 March 16 20:00” as of this posting.
They want to pump water in using firetrucks so they can control the rate better and avoid any of that.
Ah!
“This environmental radiation which ORDC measures is the airborne radiation in units of nGy/h (nanograys per hour). The airborne radiation level around ORDC is generally measured to be 30 - 40 nGy/h. “
Latest readings are in the 600 to 700 nGy/h range.
Wind is from the dirction of damged plants.
http://www.jaea.go.jp/04/o-arai/Oantai_e/html/tbl_msr1h0.html
Is there a map showing the areas of Japan that are effected by radiation? As in how far it has spread? This would be useful for travelers.
It’s always hard to interpret numbers. A 20% increased risk of cancer... so if, prior to exposure, I had a 5% risk of cancer, would I have a 6% risk of cancer post-exposure? That would represent a 20% increase. Not to minimize significance... but that doesn’t seem abundantly significant.
Thanks for the reply, it would be nice if all this would go away on a few days, but somehow I don't think that is very likely.
nuclear reactions of the fission products continue to generate decay heat at initially roughly 7% of full power level, which requires 1 to 3 years of water pumped cooling. If cooling fails during this post-shutdown period, the reactor can still overheat to above 2200 degrees centigrade where separation of water in to its constituent elements Hydrogen and Oxygen occurs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressurized_water_reactor
“I saw a thread last night about the reactors being in cold shutdown.”
There are two sets of power stations. That was about power station #2 and its reactor plants. The problems are at power station #1’s reactors.
I see the point you were trying to make. I forgot the energy losses associated with converting the steam energy mechanically to electrical power with the turbines. The chart in post #24 shows the direct thermal output of the individual reactors (in megawatts) before electrical generation.
“The used fuel pools at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors are located at the top of the reactor buildings for ease of handling during refueling operations.”
am I understanding correctly that spent fuel rods were stored in the tops of these containment buildings? Are these the same buildings whose roofs have been blown off by explosions? Have the containment rods blown out along with the roofs?
If so, what a cluster!
we are half a planet away from any of that fallout. I would be much more concerned if I were downstream from a hydro electric plant.
There really is no effective way to generate energy that does not involve a danger to the public. It is an acceptable risk inasmuch as the alternatives are going to more deadly in the long run.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.