Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: janetjanet998
Here's a link regarding potential harm to humans: http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/sec21/ch317/ch317a.html#sec21-ch317-ch317a-605 It doesn't answer your specific question, but at the peak reading from yesterday (400mSv/hour) there is 20% increased risk of cancer from 2.5 hours of exposure plus up to five percent chance of death from radiation sickness from anything longer than that.
30 posted on 03/16/2011 7:18:14 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

It’s always hard to interpret numbers. A 20% increased risk of cancer... so if, prior to exposure, I had a 5% risk of cancer, would I have a 6% risk of cancer post-exposure? That would represent a 20% increase. Not to minimize significance... but that doesn’t seem abundantly significant.


34 posted on 03/16/2011 7:23:20 AM PDT by mn-bush-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson