She's ineluctable!
Posted on 03/14/2011 4:54:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
the so called intellectuals and Establishment on both sides of the aisle don’t like Sarah
As somebody said “She got all of the right people not liking her”
There is Sarah Palin and then there are 28 other teams....
Timing is everything.
I have pretty much written off the Bush family myself. Not so much as Blue Bloods , but as RINO’s.
They aren't on our side. They want some tame little establishment Republican who will nod his head and do what he is told. That's not what our country needs at this point. We have run out of time.
Elites just hate “common” people no matter how smart they are. Sarah will smoke them all in the debates and convince the American people of her smarts, the hell with the intellectual snobs (probably can’t walk and chew gum).
>>>She will be the next president if I have anything to say about it. Look at who her enemies are and choose a side. >>>>>>
here,here!
Sarah Palin is the mirror the right deep thinkers don’t want to see.
If the Country Club hates her, what’s not to love?
Pray for America
Well done El Rushbo. 2ndDivisionVet you know I’m all in when the time comes.
Rush himself was born into a well-to-do family of lawyers, but he is self-made as far as his career is concerned.
She's ineluctable!
Embodied on this site by people like pissant. What gives?
Dang,I mean OK maybe there's someone else out there who is as good or better than Palin who has a shot at winning (haven't seen 'em yet).
But regardless, what's with this hatred of those who are essentially on our side? What happened to being able to have a disagreement without hating the other guy?
And what happened to a reasoned debate along these lines? We're acting like the Irrational Left that we're purportedly against.
A pro-business, pro-gun, pro-life, pro-freedom, common-sense conservative religious family-oriented champion of personal responsibility and small government....
Yeh, I suppose she’s just not good enough for some FReepers and others, but I could go for that - in a microsecond!
Or you have your choice of 4 more years of watching Obama play golf or whichever RINO is behind door number two...
LOL! Notice there's no mention that the media was blaming Sarah Palin for Gabrielle Giffords shooting. THAT'S what led to her "blood libel" comment. She was being accused of inciting mass murder and she's supposed to silently sit there and take it??? She's not supposed to respond?
And, besides, I doubt if 95% of Americans had any idea that the term "blood libel" had anything to do with The Holocaust. I had never heard the term before and I doubt if the author of this piece did, either.
I’m thinking I could raise 100-200 large of that $2 million right here on FR, when the time comes. Maybe a lot more...
I get she’s not perfect. News flash number one: None of the candidates are, and frankly, I can think of several of the others who have bigger problems than she does. Yes, Mike and Newt, I’m looking at you. News flash number two: To call somebody the Al Sharpton (or the Jesse Jackson, or the Louis Farrakhan, just so we get those fine gentlemen covered) of the right means something specific about that person. Sarah Palin is not the Al Sharpton (or any of those other guys) of the right. That is, if not a blood libel, certainly a libel. If I have to explain why, you’re an idiot. Get off FR now.
What’s with the tagline? Typo?
It’s not exclusively used in that context, so it was not a religious slur, as the Left would have you believe. Besides, when did they become pro-Jewish?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.