Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3rd Reactor of Fukushima No.1 Nuclear Plant Explodes(NHK)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 03/14/11

Posted on 03/13/2011 7:31:39 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Head line only so far.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; fukushima
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 last
To: TigerClaws

“There are 30-40 similar GE reactors here in the United States by the way”

Actually there are 23 GE boiler reactors in the US. With that said, it wasn’t the quake that caused the problem it was the tsumani that caused the pumps to fail. The majority of the US plants aren’t in areas prone to tsumani.


181 posted on 03/14/2011 7:33:38 AM PDT by NicNacPattyWac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chimera

I don’t know what to make of this- it seems unlikely in the extreme that the plant design wouldn’t have included earthquake/tsunami planning. But this guy says otherwise- not sure if I believe him

BBC- 1426: Mr Goto says his greatest fear is that blasts at number 3 and number 1 reactors may have damaged the steel casing of the containment vessel designed to stop radioactive material escaping into the atmosphere. More to follow.

BBC- 1422: Japanese engineer Masashi Goto, who helped design the containment vessel for Fukushima’s reactor core, says the design was not enough to withstand earthquakes or tsunamis and the plant’s builders, Toshiba, knew this. More on Mr Goto’s remarks to follow.


182 posted on 03/14/2011 7:41:32 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
I know in this country a plant builder has to show that in the event of an earthquake twice as powerful as the most powerful ever recorded for the region the plant is built you can still shutdown the plant safely. This is called the design basis earthquake. I assume this also must include subsequent events such as tsunami, aftershock, etc.

I do not know what the safety authorities in Japan require for plant licensing.

183 posted on 03/14/2011 7:56:25 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: chimera

Thanks for the information. As you can tell, some of us are learning on the fly- trying to sort out hype/hysteria from facts and possibilities.


184 posted on 03/14/2011 8:10:45 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

God Bless them all. They were brave people staying at their jobs to control a dangerous situation, in order to protect their fellow citizens.


185 posted on 03/14/2011 9:25:54 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Well, at least Anderson Cooper had the guts to admit that he doesn’t understand what’s going on, because he flunked science in school. ;o)


186 posted on 03/14/2011 9:29:51 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Since they did not see an increase in onsite or offsite rad levels following the explosion, that supports the hypothesis that containment is intact.

Which speaks to the strength of those reactors, to have weathered a 9.0 earthquake, a 10 meter tsunami, AND numerous 6.0 or worse aftershocks, and still be intact. The problems stemmed from a loss of coolant, which was caused by a loss of power to the coolant pumps. The newer generation of the reactors does not rely on electric power to run the coolant through, and around the reactor, so those will be extremely reliable.

It's my understanding that the Fukushima reactors, being the Generation II design, are some of the oldest active reactors in Japan, and were due to be 'retired' in the next few years, when the Gen. III, which doesn't have the coolant pump issue, come online.

187 posted on 03/14/2011 9:38:52 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: TYVets

A core meltdown is not the same thing as a containment breach.. Just as the outer building exploding from a hydrogen blast is not the same as a containment breach.

When you lose containment, you have a major major issue, until then you dont have a major event in terms of radiation. Even a full core melt down in a plant with this design, presuming it has not lost containment will not cause a major radioactive event.

Now what is going on on the ground? I don’t know, but everything I have read to this point, says that all radioative monitoring has not shown any elevated levels of radiation. Now they could be lying to the public, though in this day and age with the internet, I think if some joe schmoe had his own personal geiger counter and was reading high levels we’d see it on youtube etc.

So to date I am prone to believe that there has not been a core breach and while a meltdown may be imminent, it too should not pose a major threat to the population or environment.

Time will tell how this all plays out, but for now it seems to me like more mass hysteria being stirred up by the press than fact.


188 posted on 03/14/2011 9:50:08 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

You need a pressure vessel failure and then a breach of containment to release significant quantities of fission products. There is no evidence of either failing at this point. What we have seen so far is a consequence of releasing vaporized coolant to keep pressure down, since evidently pressure reduction systems (e.g., containment or vessel sprays) are not operable for some reason.


189 posted on 03/14/2011 10:00:42 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
My guess is that the event exceeded the design basis earthquake but they were still able to get those units shutdown safely (i.e., scam and initial cooldown). The trips on seismic event worked. The emergency diesels started and provided initial site emergency power in the station blackout event that followed the earthquake. It was the common-mode failure of the tsunami taking out the diesels that started the whole accident sequence. That will probably be the result for the rest of the industry, looks at post-seismic phenomena and take steps to mitigate the consequences of those.
190 posted on 03/14/2011 10:28:55 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Well, at least Anderson Cooper had the guts to admit that he doesn’t understand what’s going on, because he flunked science in school. ;o)

Well, props to him for admitting that. More talking heads ought to be up front about their lack of general scientific knowledge.

What's more disconcerting, are the so-called "experts" the networks keep rolling out. I can't believe the amount of hype, scare-mongering, and outright falsehoods I've heard out their mouths since this situation first started.

191 posted on 03/14/2011 11:28:37 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: svcw

five, four, three, two...


192 posted on 03/14/2011 11:30:21 AM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Time will tell how this all plays out, but for now it seems to me like more mass hysteria being stirred up by the press than fact.

Someone here on FR Saturday posted the web site address of the Nuclear Energy Institute, along with the statement that NEI Updates didn't have an agenda.

I started checking their site for updates at that time. It appears to me that they only update information that is accurate based on the information available at that time.

NEI appears not to have a regular schedule for their updates.

They are the opposite of the embarrassing United States MSM.

http://www.nei.org/newsandevents/information-on-the-japanese-earthquake-and-reactors-in-that-region/

193 posted on 03/14/2011 12:35:44 PM PDT by TYVets (Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson