Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear power is always unsafe, says Greenpeace
news.com.au ^

Posted on 03/13/2011 4:54:10 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Nuclear power is always unsafe, says Greenpeace

* From: AAP * March 14, 2011 10:22AM

ENVIRONMENTALISTS say the possibly catastrophic failure of a Japanese nuclear reactor shows that nuclear power can never be safe.

Two reactors at the Fukushima plant in north-eastern Japan have been damaged by the devastating earthquake which struck nearby on Friday, and at least one is in danger of meltdown.

Radiation has been released into the air after an explosion at one reactor, and although authorities have said it is not intense enough to affect human health, they have ordered evacuations of people living within 20km.

"This proves once and for all that nuclear power cannot ever be safe," Greenpeace campaigns head Steve Campbell said today.

"Japan's nuclear plants were built with the latest technology, specifically to withstand natural disasters, yet we still face potential meltdown," he said in a statement.

Greenpeace was also concerned about the lack of information about the total amount of radiation already released, and whether the ponds for spent radioactive fuel - outside the containment area of the reactor - were secure.

"We request that Japan's government share this information with the public immediately," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; fukushima; greenpeace; nuclearpower; terrorists; terrororganization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Sub-Driver

So are ecofreaks. Totally unstable. All the time.


41 posted on 03/13/2011 5:38:20 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Greenpeace was also concerned about the lack of information about the total amount of radiation already released, and whether the ponds for spent radioactive fuel - outside the containment area of the reactor - were secure.”

Because Japan wisely reprocesses their spent fuel, they probably have very little setting around, like we do. Thanks Jimmy Carter.


42 posted on 03/13/2011 5:40:04 PM PDT by DakoKid ( Every Dollar of Taxation is a Dollar of Lost Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
JEES THE FRENCHIES SEEM TO LOVE NUKES.... THEY have 56 working nuclear plants, generating over 75% of their electricity. The french people love them; nuclear plants bring jobs and wealth everywhere in France they're built. It's sort of embarassing to think that little FRANCE has beatin the pants off US in the race for energy independence. I don't like it that the US is second to anybody!
43 posted on 03/13/2011 5:55:47 PM PDT by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

Great photos Cheetahcat, I haven’t seen those. I’ve argued until blue in the face with envirowackos about this PC power lunacy using available data and first hand accounts of ranchers/farmers that live (or used to) next to turbines (West Texas).

There are many dangerous problems associated with this technology as well as wildlife empact, but gee, since it’s green power, who cares....

Nothing like toxins wafting over the countryside from these fires. My guess would be bearing blow-out/overheating, shorts, lightning strikes (is that in the ball park?). Now add to that the sheer numbers of windplants that need maintenance, road systems, power grid, safety measures, etc., it’s a huge “footprint”. A

nd then my wife was wondering how firefighters can fight such a thing, good question.

Thanks for this food for thought.


44 posted on 03/13/2011 5:57:16 PM PDT by brushcop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


45 posted on 03/13/2011 6:09:33 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


46 posted on 03/13/2011 6:09:43 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


47 posted on 03/13/2011 6:09:43 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


48 posted on 03/13/2011 6:09:43 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


49 posted on 03/13/2011 6:09:54 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


50 posted on 03/13/2011 6:10:07 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


51 posted on 03/13/2011 6:10:07 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


52 posted on 03/13/2011 6:10:45 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago....


53 posted on 03/13/2011 6:10:45 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: brushcop
Great photos Cheetahcat, I haven’t seen those. I’ve argued until blue in the face with envirowackos about this PC power lunacy using available data and first hand accounts of ranchers/farmers that live (or used to) next to turbines (West Texas).

There are many dangerous problems associated with this technology as well as wildlife empact, but gee, since it’s green power, who cares....

Nothing like toxins wafting over the countryside from these fires. My guess would be bearing blow-out/overheating, shorts, lightning strikes (is that in the ball park?). Now add to that the sheer numbers of windplants that need maintenance, road systems, power grid, safety measures, etc., it’s a huge “footprint”. A

nd then my wife was wondering how firefighters can fight such a thing, good question.

Thanks for this food for thought.

The gear technology they use heats the lubricating oil very hot and there is a lot of it up there to burn.

54 posted on 03/13/2011 6:10:52 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
And so is coal, oil, gas, hydroelectric, wind, solar and geothermal.

They are against all forms of energy that are really useful. Have you ever augured with one of these idiots from Greenpeace? I have and it's like talking to a brick wall. In fact a brick wall is more intelligent. These people want to destroy industrial society. They are beyond dangerous.

A few of them will support Wind and Solar but when you ask them questions about how would wind or solar solve our transportation needs, they clam up. They just say we need to come up with better solutions. That's the ultimate cop out. These are VERY foolish people and very frivilous people. Many of these fools have government jobs if you check into it.
55 posted on 03/13/2011 6:10:52 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Greenspeace may be right. We should consider going back to safe, renewable whale oil for lights and heating.


56 posted on 03/13/2011 6:23:41 PM PDT by tumblindice (Me? Just stirrin' the pot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brivette
I used to be on a fast attack, many years ago

you seem to still be on the fast attack

57 posted on 03/13/2011 6:25:01 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

greenpeace is always unsafe says logic. These eco-dolts are so illogical and mislead that I am surprised they haven’t hung them selves or ingested sulphuric acid as yet. They want everyone (except for them selves) to live in a 12th century mode of existence so we don’t tarnish Ghia, their earth god. I am so disgusted with their lunacy I just might go out tomorrow and purchase 5 gallons of motor oil and pour it on some baby harp seals or something. On second thought, I’ll just sit here and ponder their never-ending lunacy.


58 posted on 03/13/2011 6:27:34 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
Greenspeace may be right. We should consider going back to safe, renewable whale oil for lights and heating.

how could we do that without killing the whale maybe we could just hug them real hard?????

59 posted on 03/13/2011 6:29:25 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

If you squeeze them gently enough—like`sea-kittens’—you can milk the oil from their bung-holes.
It helps to hum `Michael Row The Boat Ashore’ as you milk them. They really like that one.


60 posted on 03/13/2011 6:40:35 PM PDT by tumblindice (Me? Just stirrin' the pot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson