Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Mitch Daniels supports means-testing of Social Security and Medicare -- see this interview . I used to think he would be a good GOP nominee, but I am now unenthusiastic.
1 posted on 03/09/2011 5:53:54 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1
I don't support means testing. I support abolishment of the program in it's entirety. Privatize it.

We are stuck supporting current retirees and those who are say 40 years old and older but anyone younger needs to be freed from the SS slavery and start saving for their own retirement.

2 posted on 03/09/2011 5:57:41 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“Many Americans see Social Security as a savings plan, albeit a coerced one....”

well, D’UH


3 posted on 03/09/2011 5:58:01 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Welfare programs ought to be means tested, and SS, Medicare, and Medicare are just welfare. The article makes that plain. The only issue is “perception”. The reality is that it is welfare.


4 posted on 03/09/2011 5:58:34 AM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Whatever happened to “We are all equal before the Law.”?...............
I guess some pigs are more equal than others..........


5 posted on 03/09/2011 6:00:41 AM PST by Red Badger (How can anyone look at the situation in Libya and be for gun control is beyond stupid. It's suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The Obama Phone -

NO JOKE
This is unbelievable !!
Just when you think you’ve heard it all, our illustrious Congress quietly comes up with a new zinger to put their hands in your pockets, and pick them while you aren’t watching. Isn’t this just wonderful ?

I was standing in line at the checkout counter at Wal Mart and as I looked at the line behind me, I saw a couple of people talking about what looked like identical new cell phones, bragging about the fact that their phones were free and so was the airtime.

The woman in line behind me had heard the same exchange and turned to the young man behind her and asked, ‘Is that a new type of cell phone?’ The young man replied, ‘Yes, this is my new Obama phone. She asked him what an Obama phone was, and he went on to say that, ‘Welfare recipients are now eligible to receive what he described as (1) a FREE new cell phone, and (2) approximately 70 FREE minutes of air time every month.’

Needless to say, I was a little skeptical about his answer, so when I got back home, I Googled it, and lo and behold, he was telling the truth. This was what I discovered:

SafeLink Wireless is a government supported program that provides a free cell phone and airtime each month for income-eligible customers. In other words, your tax dollars are being distributed to a wireless phone provider to provide welfare recipients with free cell phones and airtime. I don’t know about you, but as for me, enough is enough. We are $14 Trillion in debt, Congress is balking at continuing unemployment payments to those who want to work, and Congress is increasing the dole-out to dead beats.

The ship of State is sinking, and it’s sinking fast. The old concept of getting ahead through hard work has flown out the window. It has been replaced by Obama’s and Congress’ idea of Hope and Change. The country has changed all right, changed to “Why should I work for it, when I can get it for free?”

You can click on the link below to confirm for yourself that the Obama Phone is real.

Just have a barf bag ready.

https://www.safelinkwireless.com/EnrollmentPublic/Home.aspx


6 posted on 03/09/2011 6:01:27 AM PST by SF_Redux (Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Many Americans see Social Security as a savings plan

That, in a nutshell, is the problem. It isn't a savings plan. Its a Ponzi scheme. Any taxes paid for Social Security went to pay general expenditures and were not put into some savings account like way too many people believe it was. The people who were in at the beginning got a windfall but they are dead and we can't get the money back from them. We are left holding the bag. A lot of people are very angry about that but it doesn't change the facts--you don't have a Social Security "savings account" that you paid into.

Quite frankly, Social Security should be means tested. It should be a welfare program. This country should not have middle class welfare. That is what is destroying us. If we want to give some money to poor old people so they don't starve--the original purpose of Social Security--fine. But it should not be a middle class entitlement.

8 posted on 03/09/2011 6:05:40 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("The time will come when Winter will ask you what you were doing all Summer" -- Henry Clay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Actually, Milton Friedman was against even means-testing poverty programs. It’s the means-testing that produces perverse incentives and make poverty programs function as the subsidization of poverty (and you always get more of what you subsidize). If a society decides that it want to succor the poor with tax revenues, it turns out to be far better to give everyone a subsistence payment (maybe in part in constrained forms like Food Stamps), treat the subsistence payment as taxable income, and slightly increase tax rates so that the whole plan costs less on net than whatever means-tested poverty programs the society thought it wanted.

The perverse incentives to not earn lest one lose benefits are gone, as is the need for poverty bureaucracies to vet people for benefits.


10 posted on 03/09/2011 6:10:28 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I believe in means testing. I you didn’t pay in it means you get no money..


12 posted on 03/09/2011 6:11:48 AM PST by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Means-testing makes perfect sense. SS is not a pension plan—it’s a safety net.


13 posted on 03/09/2011 6:19:01 AM PST by Huck (Fools make feasts and wise men eat them - Poor Richard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Ping


19 posted on 03/09/2011 6:29:55 AM PST by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

This is certainly one of the most volatile issues going.
Even on FR you can see the wide range of strong opinions.

In my wildest dreams I see Democrats getting “payback” from the voters for the decades long fraud of SS and Medicare. But I know it will never happen.

The bottom line is at some point soon the debt game will be over, interest rates will take off, and the US will have to meet its fate.


27 posted on 03/09/2011 6:46:46 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

At least means testing would finally lift the veil off of the scam, and show that Social Security is nothing but another wealth transfer tax, just like any other tax.


32 posted on 03/09/2011 7:10:42 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Just exempt my pre-tax 401k contributions up to the amount SS “owes” me (including the employer contribution) and we’ll call it square. That would encourage more retirement savings and still bring in income to the program. Then I don’t get the shaft on taxes when I retire and the morons that don’t save for retirement can live off SS.


37 posted on 03/09/2011 7:40:29 AM PST by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I’m 60, I’ve saved like crazy, worked a job with the object of receiving a pension. Should my peers who spent like crazy, didn’t choose work with deferred payments (a pension) and earned as much or more than me, get more in Social Security. I don’t think so.


49 posted on 03/09/2011 9:59:44 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Sulzberger Family Motto: Trois generations d'imbeciles, assez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson