It’s more important to feminists that they be allowed to have sex whenever they want without dealing with the consequences (allowed to kill their babies, free STD treatments, etc.) than it is for them to save women in Islamic countries from female genital mutilation.
}:-)4
Unless of course they happen to be conservative women, then it's open season.
Someone needs to tell these whiners that males are much more likely to be victims of violence than females. Also that the safest place for a women to be is MARRIED. Single and divorced women are more likely to be victims of violence than those who are married.
I dont want to get started on the wage gap BS.
Shaddap, b*tch! Go fix me a turkey pot pie!
Oh brother....they are as passe in the US as a pager.
They should go to Muzzieland and see how they are received over there.
on Fat Tuesday??
well done there..
Interesting that they reference "war", because they have been at war against the family unit for at least 30 years now. They think a married woman with kids is akin to an abused slave.
The thing is, they do not seem to care about literal slaves in Saharan Africa. Moral relativity, I guess.
The nags will still be grubbing for donations as Islam consumes them.
What a joke. These shriveled old bats declaring strides around the world...yet not a one of them will stand up for that muslim woman buried up to her neck in the ground and having hateful people stoning her.
They should be hanging their heads in shame.
"war on women" = interfering with the feminist agenda.
"family planning" = abortion
"misogyny" = men are evil and women who agree with those men are traitors to their sex.
“The individual atrocities and indignities committed against women every day will not stop until the larger war against our sex is ended and women’s full equality is guaranteed”
Hmmm sounds wonderful... BUT I bet there are Muslim women the world over who would just settle for an immediate and permanent end to the dehumanizing gender apartheid which makes them less than chattel from birth to death.
Not one of the faux, womens rights camera hogs would last a single instant if they had to endure what Muslim women tolerate daily and what is worse, what Muslim women know to be inevitable for their daughters. Their despair has to be paralyzing too sad for words.
The perpetual intellectual and spiritual squalor enforced against Muslim women in the name of religion is so heinous and is such a brutal throwback that I wonder any of the womens rights people can look one another in the eye without shuddering!!
I see their humanitarian indignation as laughably insincere!!
NOW must speak to the issue immediately and address Muslim practices DIRECTLY-BY NAME!!!
NOW is so totally sick....they don’t even mention the war on boys and men—and how many more boys are sodomized in our country, then girls raped. The homosexuals rape 128 boys to heterosexual’s 8 girls.
The point I am making, is that their purposeful separation and divide of men and women, is to destroy men and boys and motherhood—that nurturing of both boys and girls with a biological father so that children do not become abused and objects of lust by boyfriends or strangers, where most abuse comes from.
It is abandonment of children by nurturing mothers, which opens up this cycle of abuse and they are the cause of it.
If they were a constructive organization....they would promote human rights, not be exclusive and trying to destroy the patriarchy—the most successful structure of societies in the history of the world. People need roles to be productive and efficient. NOW is trying to destroy natural law roles...and be gods and dictate the new “better” roles which deny God’s design.
All philosophy prior to the irrational Postmoderns KNEW that when you defy natural law (where we get private property rights) you can NEVER be happy. That right to the pursuit of happiness, encompasses Just Law defined by Natural Law Theory.
They are about destroying the natural family—the safest unit for raising healthy and productive human beings. (Of course, Marxists are out to destroy the family and promote perversion to destroy all relationships so the emotional health of all children is damaged and creates a dysfunctional society, in need of the nanny state).
Then stop supporting Saddam Hussein Obama and his tribe of Shi'ite heads at the White House. Otherwise get used to this look you dumb bi+ches.
Of the estimated seven members left in NOW, three are lesbians, two are actually men in drag, one is Helen Thomas, who defies categorization as to species let alone gender, and one is a confused bovine who wandered into the Starbucks where the annual convention was being held and was immediately voted Poster Mammal.
A simple solution is to change the “social sanction” around the world.
“Social sanctions” are the unwritten laws that almost every person, in every society, strongly enforces. Parents teach such laws to their children, and to a greater or lesser extent, most every person will help in some way to enforce these unwritten laws.
In America, for example, one social sanction might be if a person put on a t-shirt that said, “I have sex with young children”. They would have a hard time walking down a city sidewalk without being assailed by someone. This could run from looks of disdain, all the way to physical attack. Social sanctions can be very, very serious.
So this new unwritten law, this new social sanction, should be taught by women to other women, and to girls, everywhere around the world.
“Women and girls should *always* carry a bladed weapon with them, and if attacked by a man, they must cut him with it.”
Now, it does not matter if this is a 440 stainless fighting knife, or as little as a sharpened piece of scrap metal, or even broken glass, in very poor countries.
The social sanction is of women, demanding of other women and girls, that they must *always* have a bladed weapon on their person, and they *must* cut any boy or man that attacks them.
“Because this is what girls do.” That is the sole reason, with no other need for justification.
And then what happens? Undoubtedly some women will be beaten, or even killed, when attacked by men. But that happens right now.
But more importantly, men who *might* attack will have to think twice. And this makes all the difference in the world. “Does she have a knife? Will she cut me with it?”, are thoughts that persuade men to *not* attack in the first place.
There is a critical mass, of sorts, of women carrying bladed weapons. Many women and girls just won’t. But many will. And it is up to men to guess which ones are armed, and which ones are helpless. And they cannot tell. But the result is the same.
“I better not attack her, because she might have a knife, and she might cut me!”
And the world is changed.
“Because that is what girls do.”
“You don’t have your knife?? Here, I have an extra. You can have it. You don’t want to be out without one.”
Yes. In the middle east they subjugate women. Is that what she is talking about?
This is exactly what I thought it would be, decrying the loss of free services and restrictions on abortion, while ignoring the total subjugation of women under Islam.
To NOW, family planning clinics are places where familes are destroyed at the espense of the U.S. Taxpayers.