Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate to take up (unanimously passes!) resolution calling for $100 penalty for missing lawmakers
Wispolitics dot com ^ | 3-2-11 | Andy Szal

Posted on 03/02/2011 10:23:14 AM PST by bigbob

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

Under this resolution, a senator who is absent without leave from two or more session days is subject to a penalty equal to $100 for each day that the senator is absent without leave. In addition, the senator must reimburse the senate for the actual costs incurred to compel his or her attendance. The penalties and costs are imposed by adopting a privileged resolution that identifies the senator who has been absent without leave. A senator who is subject to the penalties and costs imposed by the resolution may only be heard on the matter on the session day on which the resolution is before the senate. If a senator who owes the penalties and costs has not paid the penalties and costs in full within 30 days after the resolution is adopted, the chief clerk will withhold from any payments due to the senator for per diem, travel expenses, or other matters, not including salary, the amount of any unpaid penalties and costs. The senate majority leader may also take certain measures to compel the attendance of any senator who is absent without leave. The resolution also allows the sergeant at arms to request the assistance of any law enforcement officer in this state to find and return any senator who is absent without leave.

(Excerpt) Read more at budget.wispolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 100awol; attendance; fine; fleebaggers; fleeparty; isthat24hrsupyet; leave; payment; penalty; senator; travelexpenses; wisconsinshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Above excerpt from 2011 SENATE RESOLUTION 3 which can be read in its entirety at the linked site above.

Symbolic, but unanimous passage also shows the unity of the Republican state Senate members.

1 posted on 03/02/2011 10:23:19 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Under this resolution, a senator who is absent without leave from two or more session days is subject to a penalty equal to $100 for each day that the senator is absent without leave.

That's not enough.

It has to be large enough that some union's slush fund can't afford to fund it.

I'd prefer $10,000/day, but I'll settle for $1,000/day.

2 posted on 03/02/2011 10:30:10 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Wow, that’s gonna hurt. That’ll show em.


3 posted on 03/02/2011 10:33:48 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Union slush funds would not be able to legally reimburse them for this. It could be a way to send some of them to jail if they try.


4 posted on 03/02/2011 10:34:44 AM PST by listenhillary (Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I’ve been looking at this site for timely Wisconsin budget updates. Seems to have lots of posts.

http://budget.wispolitics.com/

WARNING— I’m Not sure of the partisan affiliation of this site so be skeptical.


5 posted on 03/02/2011 10:39:28 AM PST by MillardFillmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

They’ll probably be able to pay for it out of their campaign accounts.


6 posted on 03/02/2011 10:41:43 AM PST by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

"No problem, we've got the cash on hand".

7 posted on 03/02/2011 10:43:32 AM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Fine them $1,000/day and assign the money to deficit reduction.


8 posted on 03/02/2011 10:43:50 AM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Union slush funds would not be able to legally reimburse them for this. It could be a way to send some of them to jail if they try.

By definition, a "slush fund" has questionable origins and/or questionable expenditures. But it's generally "off the books" anyway.

$100/day could be managed by collecting cash from supporters, a few bucks at a time. $1,000/day is a lot harder, and $10,000/day is effectively impossible to hide.

If you read the bill, the legislator doesn't even have to pay it. All he has to do is refuse, and it's deducted from per-diem or travel expense reimbursements. The resolution prohibits it from being deducted from salary.

$100/day is "walking around money" to these guys. It's not enough to "encourage" them to do anything.

9 posted on 03/02/2011 10:46:45 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Seriously?!

I would gladly pay $100 a day for a paid day off.


10 posted on 03/02/2011 10:47:25 AM PST by Never on my watch (WTF happened to my country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
$100? I can spend that at the grocery in the blink of an eye - it's chump change.

What else...five licks with a nerf bat? A shot in the but with a marshmallow gun?

Wait, I know...a one hour suspension of their reserved parking spaces....

(No wonder we can't get people to stop misbehaving)
11 posted on 03/02/2011 10:47:48 AM PST by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

They should be re-districting, and passing voter ID. Unless there are strict measures to prevent the Unions from reimbursing, this is pointless.


12 posted on 03/02/2011 10:51:14 AM PST by ROTB (Sans Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia when we revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
$100/day is "walking around money" to these guys. It's not enough to "encourage" them to do anything.

It should start at $1000 per day and double every day they are AWOL.

13 posted on 03/02/2011 10:51:31 AM PST by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bigbob; All

How about making them forego their generous healthcare and retirement packages?

It will make them show up a lot quicker than $100.

(And if I didn’t do my job, I would lose it.....why can they play these nonsesnical games?)


14 posted on 03/02/2011 10:51:45 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

...they’ll just take it from their Union contributions. :)


15 posted on 03/02/2011 10:55:50 AM PST by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking; unixfox

This is more symbolic than anything else. I think the GOPers know that some of the Dems are essentially being held against their will (talk about party discipline!) and in any case are probably receiving money from elsewere, so they probably don’t want to look as if they’re being harsh on the captive Dems and they know there’s no way they can compete with the union/Obama money that is probably being funneled into the Dems’ bank accounts even as we speak.

It’s a gesture, nothing more. But at least they made a gesture! Normally, the GOP doesn’t even do that much.


16 posted on 03/02/2011 10:56:55 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Yeah, but what if they get one of those bogus doctors notes?/sarc


17 posted on 03/02/2011 11:01:56 AM PST by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

It is $100 per DAY. That adds up. If they’re only gone for a few days, they probably wouldn’t write them up on it anyway. But if they’re gone for ten or more days, we’re into the thousands. And state legislators generally don’t earn that much money whilst in session. In fact, this may be a way to garnishee their wages without actually attaching their pay, which may be more complicated to do.


18 posted on 03/02/2011 11:12:40 AM PST by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
It has to be large enough that some union's slush fund can't afford to fund it.

The unions and their DEM supporters will afford any amount to make WI stop this madness. If they lose this, their whole charade is in jeopardy as state after state will follow in order to try and get their house in order for the impeding unfunded doom that looms on the horizon.
19 posted on 03/02/2011 11:15:49 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
In addition, the senator must reimburse the senate for the actual costs incurred to compel his or her attendance…The senate majority leader may also take certain measures to compel the attendance of any senator who is absent without leave. The resolution also allows the sergeant at arms to request the assistance of any law enforcement officer in this state to find and return any senator who is absent without leave.

The fact that the fleebaggers have to personally reimburse the State of Wisconsin for all expenses, including all costs associated with deploying law enforcement personnel in this matter, will amount to considerably more than $100/day. It could be that this is more than symbolic.

20 posted on 03/02/2011 11:21:51 AM PST by lonevoice (Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson