Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama has to get Egypt right
The Washington Post ^ | February 3, 2011 | George Soros

Posted on 02/02/2011 8:53:03 PM PST by rmlew

Revolutions usually start with enthusiasm and end in tears. In the case of the Middle East, the tears could be avoided if President Obama stands firmly by the values that got him elected. Although American power and influence in the world have declined, our allies and their armies look to us for direction.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aipac; arrowcross; georgesoros; ikhawan; muslimbrotherhood; selfloathing; smearfinancier; soros; spookydude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: rmlew
As a committed advocate of democracy and open society, I cannot help but share in the enthusiasm that is sweeping across the Middle East. I hope President Obama will expeditiously support the people of Egypt. My foundations are prepared to contribute what they can. In practice, that means establishing resource centers for supporting the rule of law, constitutional reform, fighting corruption and strengthening democratic institutions in those countries that request help in establishing them, while staying out of those countries where such efforts are not welcome.

Then keep your "resource centers" the hell out of America because you ain't welcome.


21 posted on 02/02/2011 9:38:38 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tina07
FUGS
22 posted on 02/02/2011 9:41:02 PM PST by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Violent uprisings are NOT democratic. Mubarak promising to stand aside at the next scheduled election IS democratic.

Naturally, B. Hussein Os*^thead stands AGAINST democratic principles.


23 posted on 02/02/2011 9:45:01 PM PST by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

When the planes hit the towers on 9-11, James Carville of CNN and the left, knew that would be what they would drudge Bush with relentlessly, purely for political reasons.

The right needs a James Carville. NOW


24 posted on 02/02/2011 9:56:37 PM PST by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capydick

Thanks!!


25 posted on 02/02/2011 10:24:43 PM PST by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85 -Happy B'day Daddy 2/20/23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Perfect name for him!


26 posted on 02/02/2011 10:31:14 PM PST by milagro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
It is scum like Soros that cause wars, that cause people to kill each other. In every war there is always a third party benefactor, history proves it. It's puzzling why civilization hasn't eliminated the instigator/profiteers first before starting to kill each other.
27 posted on 02/02/2011 10:59:49 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
[George Soros']foundations are prepared to contribute what they can. In practice, that means establishing resource centers for supporting the rule of law, constitutional reform, fighting corruption and strengthening democratic institutions in those countries that request help in establishing them...

That explains the presence of Code Pink and International A.N.S.W.E.R

28 posted on 02/02/2011 11:18:31 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Violent uprisings are NOT democratic. Mubarak promising to stand aside at the next scheduled election IS democratic.

So just so I understand, you basically would have sided with King George had he promised to allow elections in 1777?

Your statement might be construed in a manner that would condemn the American Revolution as a non-democratic undertaking.

29 posted on 02/02/2011 11:24:16 PM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Using profanity gives people who don't want information from you an excuse not to listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

F*** SOROS!

Anti-Semitic Anti-American Nazi collaborator bastard!


30 posted on 02/02/2011 11:26:25 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (0bamanomics: Punish Success, Reward Failure. Destroying America is the point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit

I don’t remmeber our Founding Father’s including communists and members of the Muslim Brotherhood. This is not 1776 or even 1789. Try 1979 and drop the cultural relativism.


31 posted on 02/02/2011 11:29:26 PM PST by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

It’s worth remembering at his time;; 90 percent of the Nations in the world could solve 90 percent of their problems if their ‘’leaders’’ would allow it.


32 posted on 02/02/2011 11:55:02 PM PST by Waco (From Seward to Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Luckily no one lives forever, including Soros.


33 posted on 02/03/2011 12:00:34 AM PST by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

George Soros? ‘nuff said!


34 posted on 02/03/2011 1:33:08 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; MortMan

I call BS. Look what the MortManwrote. He said that violence can never be used for a Democratic process. This isn’t cultural relativism this is me calling him on an absolutist statement.

The US also won WWII with the help of Communists and Muslims. Does that make it less legitimate?

To be against a positive democratic move in the ME just because a democrat is in the White House is to be a RAT onesself. This all happened because of Bush and my impression is that rather than be happy for the progress (and yes, these things are never certain) there are a lot of people around here who can’t get themselves out of the mindset that somehow we need to find something bad so we can blame Obama. The only people who I thought I could imagine doing that (from 2000 - 2008) are at the DU.


35 posted on 02/03/2011 4:23:27 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Using profanity gives people who don't want information from you an excuse not to listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Soros makes one believe in demon possession. ;)


36 posted on 02/03/2011 4:37:03 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

37 posted on 02/03/2011 5:33:30 AM PST by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit

Just so you understand, I am making the point that Egypt has a democratic system already. The elected leader (albeit a strongman type of ruler) has agreed to stand aside and let the country select a new leader in the regularly scheduled elections in September.

Obama is fanning the flames to have an extra-democtratic solution to the Egyptian leadership crisis - to step around the process already in place and allow the mob to dictate who will lead the country, without giving the rest of the country (the ones not rioting) a voice in the process.

Your invocation of the American revolution is a strawman fallacy, and is repulsive. I was making the explicit point that Egypt already has a democratic method for transferring power. That is hardly appropriate to the colonies in 1776.


38 posted on 02/03/2011 7:06:35 AM PST by MortMan (What disease did cured ham used to have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

39 posted on 02/03/2011 10:03:29 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
The US also won WWII with the help of Communists and Muslims. Does that make it less legitimate?
Muslims, which Muslim country? I think you mean colonial troops for the British. However, Muslim countries were pro-Nazi. We invaded Iran. The Muslim Brotherhood and Ba'athists supported the Nazis.
AS for the Communists, it'sa complex black mark. The USSR was funcitonally allied to Nazi Germany from August 1939 until May 1941, when they split up Eastern Europe and Scandinavia. Communists in France and other allied countries tried to sabotage the allied war efforts. They only flipped when Nazi Germany invaded the USSR. They weren't our allies. They were the enemy of the enemy, who used us.

I opposed Bush's Democracy for the Muslim Brotherhood Project and Iranian influence, just as I oppose Obamas. Wislon was an evil fool. Pick up Samuel Huntington's Clash of Civilizations.

40 posted on 02/03/2011 11:45:16 AM PST by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson