[Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit]

I call BS. Look what the MortManwrote. He said that violence can never be used for a Democratic process. This isn’t cultural relativism this is me calling him on an absolutist statement.

The US also won WWII with the help of Communists and Muslims. Does that make it less legitimate?

To be against a positive democratic move in the ME just because a democrat is in the White House is to be a RAT onesself. This all happened because of Bush and my impression is that rather than be happy for the progress (and yes, these things are never certain) there are a lot of people around here who can’t get themselves out of the mindset that somehow we need to find something bad so we can blame Obama. The only people who I thought I could imagine doing that (from 2000 - 2008) are at the DU.

[rmlew]

The US also won WWII with the help of Communists and Muslims. Does that make it less legitimate?
Muslims, which Muslim country? I think you mean colonial troops for the British. However, Muslim countries were pro-Nazi. We invaded Iran. The Muslim Brotherhood and Ba'athists supported the Nazis.
AS for the Communists, it'sa complex black mark. The USSR was funcitonally allied to Nazi Germany from August 1939 until May 1941, when they split up Eastern Europe and Scandinavia. Communists in France and other allied countries tried to sabotage the allied war efforts. They only flipped when Nazi Germany invaded the USSR. They weren't our allies. They were the enemy of the enemy, who used us.

I opposed Bush's Democracy for the Muslim Brotherhood Project and Iranian influence, just as I oppose Obamas. Wislon was an evil fool. Pick up Samuel Huntington's Clash of Civilizations.