Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge in Florida Rules Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional
Fox News Detroit ^ | 1-31-2011 | Fox News

Posted on 01/31/2011 12:06:59 PM PST by Marty62

Edited on 01/31/2011 12:19:03 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Federal Judge in Florida Rules Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional

Updated: Monday, 31 Jan 2011, 3:07 PM EST
Published : Monday, 31 Jan 2011, 3:07 PM EST

(NewsCore) - A Florida federal judge ruled Monday in a 26-state challenge to the national health care law that the provision requiring individuals to purchase health insurance by 2014 or suffer a penalty is unconstitutional, Fox News Channel reported.

Excerpt, see myfoxdetroit



TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; fail; healthcare; healthcarelaw; judgevinson; obama; obamacare; obamacarefail; socializedmedicine; statesrights; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-395 next last
To: Marty62

What does all the mean? So they actually can’t take over the student loan industry and get a cut of the sale of your home? Or is it just the individual mandate that is void?


141 posted on 01/31/2011 12:39:46 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Why the boo boo lip, Obama?


142 posted on 01/31/2011 12:40:11 PM PST by goldi (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

Not true......

It is up for interpretation, that is all this means. It has been passed under the previous Commerce Clause, and it has also been signed into law. It’s a done deal. This ruling will automatically be appealed to the next level. That’s all this lower ruling will accomplish.

They will now have to reopen it, debate it and prove why it is considered “Unconstitutional” by a circuit court Judge. It will have to go to the SCOTUS.

If they rule it Unconstitutional, (And they probably won’t) then it will get kicked back to the Legislature. This thing is not dead yet.


143 posted on 01/31/2011 12:40:24 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: yorkie01

Right. NO KAGAN, but Kennedy will vote with our four.

I’ll bet the farm that I don’t own on that.


144 posted on 01/31/2011 12:40:41 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: diverteach
FWIW, Justice Kennedy has previously indicated that he would not be retiring while Oblunder was still in office.

Lets pray for Justice Kennedy and Justices Scalia, Alito, Roberts and Thomas. Hopefully, none of them will have a Vince Foster moment.

145 posted on 01/31/2011 12:41:22 PM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Well we know Chuck Schumer won’t care because the three branches of government are house, senate and president! Aren’t dumbocrats great???


146 posted on 01/31/2011 12:42:46 PM PST by Dengar01 (Go Blackhawks!!! Go Bears!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes

see post #137


147 posted on 01/31/2011 12:43:26 PM PST by diverteach (If I find liberals in heaven after my death.....I WILL BE PISSED!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

lol


148 posted on 01/31/2011 12:44:11 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Wait, shouldn't that be, "Heckuva job, Nancy!" ? Since the MSM has washed away all references to the oil spill last summer, today's ruling becomes the new

OBAMA'S KATRINA!!!


149 posted on 01/31/2011 12:44:35 PM PST by pillut48 (Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; onyx

This is great news.!!!


150 posted on 01/31/2011 12:44:42 PM PST by Clyde5445 (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Marty62


151 posted on 01/31/2011 12:45:02 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

This is excellent news.


152 posted on 01/31/2011 12:46:48 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
Actually, the next venue will be the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals for the circuit that includes Florida (11th?). If decisions in two or more of the circuit courts of appeal differ significantly, then SCOTUS will likely take jurisdiction to resolve such differences between circuits, especially on an important piece of federal legislation such as Obamacare. There are other cases of a similar natiure with differing results at trial court level: Michigan District Court (and one other?) upheld Obamacare and the mandate and Virginia District Court ruled Obamacare and its mandate unconstitutional on similar reasoning to that of the Florida District Court.

The possible outcomes at SCOTUS are two: sensible agreement with Florida and Virginia District Courts limiting the application of the Commerce Clause so as to outlaw its mandate or drastic and dangerous expansion of Commerce Clause jurisdiction of Congress which would threaten to make Congress's jurisdiction limitless so long as based on Commerce Clause "regulations." This has other implications as well since Congress claimed Commerce Clause jurisdiction in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and particularly its "public accommodations" sections and many other unrelated pieces of liberal economic and social laws.

153 posted on 01/31/2011 12:47:08 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: keat

WELL THAT DOES SHOW THE LEVEL OF INTELLIGENCE OVER AT THE DU DUMPSTER.
THE CONSTITUION IS NOT “ONE MAN”.

Only a commie/fascist would claim a FEDERAL JUDGE is “one man”.

He/she has no problem with the ONE attempting to violate the CONSTITUION OF THE UNITED STATES. Releasing tyranny on the Citizens of the U.S.


154 posted on 01/31/2011 12:48:30 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

LOL! Not much of a stretch to believe that’s just what he’s doing. Poor baby!


155 posted on 01/31/2011 12:49:18 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

Stevens thankfully told the press he had no intention of retiring until after Obama had left office.

Isn’t that just a slap in the face! LOL


156 posted on 01/31/2011 12:49:27 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

A thing of beauty!


157 posted on 01/31/2011 12:49:43 PM PST by Marty62 (Marty 60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
Thank God!
158 posted on 01/31/2011 12:49:58 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

I still don’t think we can put all our eggs in the SCOTUS basket


159 posted on 01/31/2011 12:50:23 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Danae

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!


160 posted on 01/31/2011 12:50:49 PM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-395 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson