Posted on 01/23/2011 5:20:33 AM PST by TexasCajun
HAWAII GROUND REPORT: Could Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie not be as incompetent and foolish as he appears, but orchestrating a deliberate birth certificate recovery dead end to cover his own papakole? UPDATED: Mystery solved! Reason Obama will not release birth certificate is because his name is legally written Barry Soetoro on it
Heres an interesting Ground Report from Hawaii that contains an ingenious theory about Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombies bizarre backtrack on releasing Obamas birth certificate.
Remember, Abercrombie promised that once he was elected Governor he would prove Obamas birth certificate existed because he would march down to the Hall of Records and demand its production from the archives
and he would then hold it aloft in the gentle Hawaiian breeze, high above his balding pate, for all the world to see, thereby producing the document Obama has spent millions to keep hidden.
(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...
who’s the boy with the big ears next to Stanley? Could that be his brother Ralph’s son Robert Paul Dunham?
btw, Ralph’s wife was born in England and they were married in Canada in 1947.
Interesting comment, I didn't know Ralph had a son...have you anything more...did he also have a daughter by any chance?
btw, Ralphs wife was born in England and they were married in Canada in 1947.
I believe her name was Elizabeth (Betty) Smith, is that correct? Was Elizabeth married before? Did she have a daughter born in 1942?
Too many questions? We are looking for a Shirley.
Amazing how some people have more compassion for vicious dangerous vile creatures than for innocent humans.
I used to kill centipedes in HI that were 10 to 12 inches long; two kinds - the brown kind and the ones with a lot of blue. Really (shudder) horrible. I used to have to kill them with an iron frying pan or whatever else came handy like a hammer.
I certainly don’t enjoy killing - I’m a vegetarian for crying out loud - but to kill dangerous creatures is a good deed.
Couple thoughts about the photo.
1. The sailor looking guys’ whites are way, way too white for the photograph. I don’t know the correct technical word for it but they’re just too darn white.
2. If I could see the leis more close up or with more definition it would help, since I am extremely familiar with leis and used to make many myself. They look too thick. Mostly people use plumerias which are much smaller and you can see the individual flowers. The leis are so thick they look like carnations which are not so much used since they don’t grow everywhere like plumerias, or ginger, or other local flowers. Especially then I am sure the were not so much used as they had to be imported from CA, pretty sure about that.
3. It looks like two different photos merged together. One with the sailors and black crew members or whatever they are, and one with the people in Hawaiian attire. The values are different for the two different groups.
4. They “V” fingers seem to belong to no person. They are white fingers and there doesn’t appear to be a Caucasian in that vicinity other than Stanley and his hand could not be doing that.
5. Even if Stanley is not standing up straight, the Kenyan could not be that tall in comparison.
6. The head in the dock photo looks exactly the same as the head in the sitting down party photo. Exactly. As though they took the party head, darkened it up, and placed it on someone’s body for the dock photo, and then created a crowd scene from two different photos.
What is the white thing behind the sailor’s legs?
Between o and armor is the sleeve from the shirt the man standing "bext" to jim has on. The man standing at the end HAS NO ARM, yet the sleeve of his shirt is clearly overlapping the other guy's sleeve. Armor either doesn't belong in this pic at all, or the guy standing next to the Asian woman was added. This is a strange pic.
On the pic, it looks like armor is wearing two watches. It looks like they put him in the pic and it is really the guy on the far right who is standinf next to o, if that is even o.
BTTT
“bext” to jim
NEXT to HIM! Dang!
Supposedly the leg of the other sailor. But then what is the black thing? And the front sailor’s hand is mangled and his arms are so black without any shine or reflection they look inked in.
Good find.
I like the word “bext.” It means BEtween and neXT to!
Great work you did there.
So if 0bama Sr and SADO actually married, it would have been at a Consular house (I assume that means official office, not a personal home?) and therefore no HI record would exist. Am I correct in that assumption? If they were married of course, which I really don’t have an opinion of. I sort of think they were, because the divorce really makes no sense otherwise.
Very observant, I tend to agree with all of that...there are two distinct groups of people, and the head of the kenyan doesn’t appear to belong to the body.
AN ACT
RESPECTING MARRIAGE.
Approved, August 10th, 1854. Be It Enacted by the King, the Nobles and Representatives of the Hawaiian Islands, in Legislative Council assembled: Section 1. It shall not be lawful for any Minister of religion of any sect whatsoever, or any other person to perform the marriage ceremony within this Kingdom, without first obtaining from the Minister of the Interior, a license to celebrate marriage.
Section 2. This Act shall take effect thirty days after publication in the “ Polynesian” and “Elele” newspapers, and all laws and parts of laws in conflict with this are hereby repealed.
Very interesting, you have spotted two things I hadn’t noticed, and the man without an arm, that’s a real hoot! How could I have missed that!
I didn’t notice the heart shaped white pattern on the ‘black blob’ between the ‘kenyan’ and Stanley Armour, either.
I think the head is the party photo head, just darkened.
It seems like the Hawaiian attire haoles and Orientals are from one event, and the squatting guys and black sailors are from another event, and they are all stuffed together incongruously with a stuffed in Stanley and a pretend 0bama Sr.
What I am wondering is who made this collage and when did it first appear? What did it purport to be? If it was put together as it appears to have been, it was done for a specific purpose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.