[Gondring]

Please point out where the CREW complaint is flawed. I pointed out one flaw. Her campaign's recent post hoc claims still don't get her out of it from what I see--she goofed by going halfway. Why make some payments for "rent" unless she was going by the statements reported in the DNJ? (I also note a flaw in the DNJ reporting..."splitting" didn't necessarily mean "half")

I've pointed out flaws in the complaints and reporting against her; I've pointed out flaws in the defense of her. I have been as even-handed as could be. Seems that many people are jumping to her defense in a purely partisan way without information. Why is that better than honesty--is that what conservatism means now? Do we want to proudly say, "Character doesn't count!" as the new motto of conservatism? Or will we hold supposed conservatives to high standards, too, even if the Left is dishonest.

[exit82]

Save your posturing for someone who cares.

Everything out of CREW is flawed. You can start with the self serving description of its 501(c)3 purpose in the complaint. If any of that is true we would be seeing complaints filed for all kinds of candidates.

Note the complaint was filed on Sept 20th, at the beginning of her campaign for Senate, just a week after the primary election was won by her.

The CREW complaint show alleged “facts” as they understand them. That doesn’t mean they are true.

The FEC has all her filings. If they are incorrect, they are free to go after her.

When a clearly partisan Soros funded hack organization like CREW goes after someone, I’m suspect of the motives.

When CREW goes after Obama for all of the foreign money recieved by Obama in 2008 laundered under a faulty credit card system, I might listen to them.

At least now, Christine has the cash to fight these thugs.

[muawiyah]

This is politics ~ there's no time for petty "honesty" and nitpicking ~ you can get into that After the election.

At the same time I disagree with the idea that campaign finances should be regulated in any manner at all.

[lakewood man]

i’m with you i don’t get why so many here insist on backing this extremely flawed candidate/private person financially.

It is maddening to me to sit here and read conservatives start by saying , “ya, but what about” ...... or “but he does.........” or “they are doing the same.........” a lot sound like whiny liberals in the work place or children blaming others why o why people cannot she just be a horrible candidate and someone who has no idea on how to conduct ones self either professionally or privately?
Finally she had 4 treasurers in a span of a couple of months, is this the way a conservative handles things ?