Posted on 12/25/2010 5:21:57 AM PST by Islander7
The Navy cruiser USS Port Royal is back in Pearl Harbor shipyard for more than $20 million in repairs on top of the $40 million spent to fix damage from a 2009 grounding and an $18 million refurbishment immediately before the warship ran aground.
The latest yard period, which began in September and is expected to end in late February, is to address cracks discovered in the aluminum alloy superstructures on all 22 of the Navy's Ticonderoga-class cruisers, officials said. The ships were commissioned between 1986 and 1994.
(Excerpt) Read more at staradvertiser.com ...
Johnson said the cracks on the Port Royal are not related to the ship's Feb. 5, 2009, grounding in 14 to 22 feet of shoal water off Honolulu Airport's reef runway. The 567-foot warship was stuck for four days as wave action rocked the vessel on the reef.
Mike
Bump for later
I remember that well. I think they changed to a different alloy rather than scrap AL superstructures all together. Or maybe the Brits were using a different alloy.
That was in 1982, I belive. The weight savings is well worth the use of AL so long as it doesn’t turn Roman Candle.
I worked at the shipyard where this boat was built for a brief time in the early 70s. Didn’t take me long to figure out that aluminum fabrication wasn’t my cup of tea.
The aluminum has been long known as a problem. The November 1975 collision between the USS JFK and Cruiser Belknap was prolly the earliest example.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/USS_Belknap_collision_damage.jpg
To make things worse belknap was carrying nukes at the time.
Damn those fools for wasting and ruining an otherwise stable fighting platform. These ships are the backbone of our Carrier Battlegroups effectiveness and safety.
How dare these foolish naval archeticts, builders and engineers.
As Citizens, we are the ultimate customers of these ships, we must seek financial reimbursement for our cruiser fleet and demand reparations. Sue the Bastar#@^@s
They will end up wrapping steel bands around them.
No it didn't
1. The superstrucure was steel
2. External Fire damage. Paint blistered of most of the hull. Fibreglass stack and radar dome baked. Structure intact
I will look up the Ticonderoga class construction in a minute.
I was on the Richard E. Byrd, DDG 23, in the early seventies. That class was supposedly one of MacNamera’s brain farts. The ship was designed as a multi-mission platform with electronics out the wazoo. A lot of the equipment still used vacuum tubes in that era. I was told that was one reason for the aluminum superstructure. Even then, the ship was top heavy. The ship rolled like you wouldn’t believe in storms.
The ship was sold to the Greek Navy for spare parts. They last used it for missile practice. From the picture that’s on the internet, I didn’t see the aluminum superstructure melting/burning.
They are described as “Steele hull” - “aluminum superstructure”. Another handful of them were built by BIW in Maine.
Maybe the next generation of missile cruisers will be titanium.
This is a PRIME example of trying to stuff 10 lbs of stuff into a 5 lb sock. These hulls were originally meant for Spruance Class DD and they worked our splendidly for that however when the Navy tried to stuff a Tico Class DG into them they were stretched to the limit. Also the shipyards where they were built were not known for quality work.
I don't think you can blame Strange. The Adams class DDGs were designed and ordered during the Eisenhower Administration.
I think the correct words would be driven aground, unless it is like one of those suv's that run around killing people.
Aluminum is used in termite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.