Posted on 12/21/2010 6:25:21 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior
With little attention from mainstream media, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with the foreign ministers of Canada and Mexico in a North American Foreign Ministers Meeting in Quebec, Canada.
The Dec. 13 meeting is a prelude to the next North American Summit Leaders meeting in 2011, a yet unscheduled trilateral summit that is the continuation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. Under the low-key format, the continental meetings have been carried out with little fanfare and outside of congressional oversight.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Also mentioned on the website of the Canadian government was "the importance of an integrated North American approach to climate change, clean energy, and environmental issues writ large," as well as trilateral cooperation cyber security, Internet freedom and privacy.... (seems Free Traders also are Cap And Traders, too...my comments)
.....According to the State Department website, Clinton stated, "I want to say first and foremost that the partnership between Canada, Mexico, and the United States is of critical importance."
Clinton said the U.S., Canada and Mexico work together every day, "whether it is to drive economic progress, or strengthen our security, or address urgent problems such as climate change or violent extremism in places like Afghanistan, or narco-traffickers or pandemic disease," producing a profound impact on every level, "locally, regionally and globally."
bookmark
Here is ‘SPP’ under another name;
Turn in your worthless dollars for ameros while you can.
They can take this NAU nonsense and shove it until their eyes cross.
Evening UCFRoadWarrior,
Merry Christmas,
This is all so much crappola cause I’ve not read a word about any of this in the Main stream media.
Yeah,,,,, Right...
“I want to say first and foremost that the partnership between Canada, Mexico, and the United States is of critical importance.”
Of course it is of critical importance but keep it quite please...
Robert A. Pastor gains a new title, “Professional liar”
Remember when the professional liar told everyone that the SPP was declared “dead” -— by one of its chief architects, American University Professor Robert A. Pastor, who for nearly 15 years has been a major proponent of building a “North American Community.”
Must have been an oversight on the part of the reporter.
/S
Still selling climate change (tax and imprison, I mean cap and trade). Still selling illness (scheduled pandemic) and still selling their phoney war on drugs.
I know that you know that we know that they know their issues are BS. The mystery is, are they the village idiots or are we?
.... and there are people on this site who will drag out their tin-foil hat cartoons when you mention evidence like that.....
not me, for one....
I do like that idea.....
However, the ruling class does not support such a logical plan....
Pretty crafty huh. If they’re talking about becoming the 51st and or plus states or something, then perhaps. If they’re talking about something grander than the U. S. alone, they can stuff it.
I expect us to have healthy relationships with healthy nations on our border. I do not expect to have one invade us, and another trying to meld us into something we are not.
Canadians should be proud of their nation. They shouldn’t be looking to become a part of the U. S. anymore than we should be looking to become part of them.
Any full linkage between the nations requires governing bodies to make decisions best for both. That is a layer of governance over that which we already have, and I abjectly disagree with it.
With what we already have over us, we already have no say in what Washington, D. C. does. Why should any of us desire something even worse?
This talk of us becoming something more is disturbing. We have had excellent relations with Canada. Why should we change that? I do not get this movement at all, unless it all amounts to neutering self-determination for U. S. Citizens, something that makes the U. N. that much more in control.
God forbid that...
That site was talking about allowing the individual provinces to vote to become states
Most likely the fare east and west would join the USA leaving Qubec out and perhaps the province next to it in the west.
If that’s it, I’m all for it. I appreciate you taking the time to mention that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.