If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

[anglian]

“Schizophrenics and the clinically depressed don’t form PACS and try to ramrod a perverted agenda on normal society.”
I’m sure there are some clinically depressed homosexuals and homosexual schizophrenics who do.

[melancholy]

It seems to me that there's quite a few people who claim not to care about the homosexual agenda that are taking criticism of the homosexual agenda VERY personally.

We've got a winner!

We've got a winner!

This is a damning statement that explains and sums up the attitude of some posters in two words, "VERY PERSONALLY."

A very experienced psychiatrist couldn't have said it better.

Thanks wagglebee.

[wagglebee]

You know, there are plenty of threads posted on here dealing with subjects I really don't care about, it's of no consequence to me what one side or the other thinks and I never click on those threads.

The "oh yeah I'm against the homosexual agenda, but need to point out that I have dozens of homosexual friends and none of them act like what you're describing" crowd reminds me of the type of person who calls a help line because they have a "friend" with some problems.

[little jeremiah]

Yes indeed.

[Stourme]

[Stourme]Our hope is that these people will see that homosexuality is evil. Those urges are to be resisted and conquered.

[presently no screen name]Are you serious? You actually think they don't know homosexuality isn't evil? Did they catch you up with their deception? They hid in the closet for years because of it! NOW w/PC in the world, and evil being more present and more accepted - they now want to cram down their evil ways on society to accept it!!

[Stourme responds] Yes I'm serious. But I have to wonder about your level of understarnding of the situation. Most homosexuals and those that support them do not consider homosexuality to be 'evil'. Most believe they were born that way and it's normal. Yes, they want to cram their evil way on us. That's what librals do.

[Stourme]Calling people names never wins them over. Ridiculing people doesn't win the over.

[presently no screen name]Is evil too strong a word for these limp wristed deviants of the world? Jesus called sin EVIL! They ridicule themselves and ridicule goodness with their gay pride naked parades with an 'up your' attitude. Worse than Sodom and Gomorrah. And you think a 'name' is an offense?

[Stourme] Did I not call it evil? Name calling says more about you than it does about them. It's low brow. It accomplishes nothing good. Jesus also said He came for the sinner and invites all men to come to Him. And until His return we are to try to recover these people. We do not recover them by driving them away and making them enemies. Hate and contention is of the devil. How is name calling an act of kindness? How is ridiculing a person showing them brotherly kindness? There's a difference between calling yourself a 'Christian' and actually following Jesus Christ.


The best way to confront this is to stick to our guns with the argument that we have the right to reject this behavior as normal. That homosexuals already have all the rights guaranteed by the constitution.

[trisham]

You know, there are plenty of threads posted on here dealing with subjects I really don't care about, it's of no consequence to me what one side or the other thinks and I never click on those threads.

The "oh yeah I'm against the homosexual agenda, but need to point out that I have dozens of homosexual friends and none of them act like what you're describing" crowd reminds me of the type of person who calls a help line because they have a "friend" with some problems.

******************************

It really is absurd, but this is not an isolated incident. It happens all the time on these threads.

[presently no screen name]

That homosexuals already have all the rights guaranteed by the constitution.

Really? Where are 'group' rights mentioned? As individuals - they had no rights? Now they have 'collective rights'? You can't see how dumb that is as you refer to the Constitution.

The best way to confront this is to stick to our guns with the argument that we have the right to reject this behavior as normal.

The ONLY way to confront it - is calling it what it is -EVIL - and what it's designed to do - DESTROY. Just like PC - with it's 'absence' of truth being spoken for the warm and fuzzy for 'feelings' sake. Which is from the pit!

Evil is evil and it is designed to DESTROY - not only man but Our Constitution! Evil destroys anything good - it doesn't stop in one area.

[melancholy]

Yep. In your statement, you mentioned the posters who “don’t care about the homosexual agenda.” It’s even worse case for the posters who stated that they ARE AGAINST the homosexual agenda and yet, got upset at posters who TRULY ARE against same agenda. See, I’m a better psychiatrist! LOL!

trisham, to answer your question “why?” There is only one answer; they have a stake in it, otherwise, they wouldn’t get that upset.

They could have close-family homosexuals, had experienced it, are (were) bisexual, are full-fledged homosexuals (will never come out of the sewers on this forum) OR any combination of the above.

Now, some of them CLAIMED they are mad at what FR and its owner turned into, from free speech/debate viewpoint. To those I say, take it up with JimRob who made his statement and enforced it.

If said posters don’t like it, they should take your (wagglebee) advice of not clicking on or taking part in threads that they object to.

Pure and simple.

[anglian]

As I’m sure not all homosexuals are intent to ramrod an “agenda” against our normal society. The guy at my local gas station is gay and he wouldn’t know what a the hell “homosexual agenda” PAC is. There are some who see what the demrat idiots are doing to this country and who vote Republican. And no I don’t hate them. I want their vote. What I do hate is hetrosexual RINOs and dems with an agenda.

[central_va]

If said posters don’t like it, they should take your (wagglebee) advice of not clicking on or taking part in threads that they object to.

"They" can't help themselves. This thread is like a lightning rod, proving that evil is attracted to good, like moths to the flame. What is really silly to me is the constant trying to convince us that sodomy is normal, that part I can't get over.

Evil can't stand ANY kind of value judgement, in their world everyone does it everyone is the same. Behavior is neither good nor evil blah, blah, blah.

[central_va]

As I’m sure not all homosexuals are intent to ramrod an “agenda” against our normal society.

Homo sexuals are the most politically active segment of society. They don't usually have kids and have PLENTY of time to cause trouble.

[Las Vegas Ron]

The guy at my local gas station is gay and he wouldn’t know what a the hell “homosexual agenda” PAC is.

How is that you know he is gay if he doesn't have an agenda?

[anglian]

Rememder this? lol! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XM5hbS7GlU127

[anglian]

His voice was a give-away. Plus another shift worker told me he was gay.

[DJ MacWoW]

As I’m sure not all homosexuals are intent to ramrod an “agenda” against our normal society.

If you actually believe that I have a nice bridge for sale.

My brother sat on my couch 3 years ago telling me there is no such thing as "gay" marriage and "gay" pride parades were disgusting displays. He has now met the "love of his life" (the 4th or 5th one) and they want to marry. And last spring I found his name on a list of credits for TA DA! a "gay" parade event.

[anglian]

dtmack
“Someone’s probably made this point already, and I just missed it. The politically active gay community is not after “tolerance”, in my mind. What they want is affirmation. There’s a big difference between the two, like the difference between civil unions and gay “marriage”.

The problem is, I think that when they force the affirmation issue, either through speech codes, diversity training in schools, etc. all they succeed in doing is to generate a backlash. One that has a nasty potential to come back to haunt them eventually.

No matter how you slice it, to many, myself included, same sex activity is unnatural, and is not just another lifestyle choice that is on equal footing with heterosexuality. For gays to accept tolerance as their ultimate goal would reinforce this point, so they need to go for affirmation. I don’t think they’ll be successful in the long run, even though it appears that they’re winning some big battles now.

So we have a situation where gays can’t accept what would be willingly given (in most cases), and are attempting to force the rest of us to believe something that’s unbelievable. This won’t play out well for them in the end.”
The so called gay issue is not the only untruth that is being foisted upon us by the ruling class. The trivialization of marriage, the denigration of the family...
Of more serious consequence is the similar cram down of Islam as “just another religion”.

http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2010/12/19/the-drunkards-progress/#comment-134859

[Stourme]

[Stourme]That homosexuals already have all the rights guaranteed by the constitution.

[presently no screen name ]Really? Where are 'group' rights mentioned? As individuals - they had no rights? Now they have 'collective rights'? You can't see how dumb that is as you refer to the Constitution.

No, but I can see that a reading comprehension refresher would do you a wonder of good. Back away from the keyboard...

[Las Vegas Ron]

His voice was a give-away

You mean the deliberate lisp or feminine physical gestures that go along with it?

That in and of its self is promoting the agenda by virtue of in your face....here I am, look at me....yoo hoo!

You will accept me....or else.

[presently no screen name]

Individuals rights! READ it! Now they are guarantee ‘group’ rights through PC! Affirmative action - PC!

You backed away from truth - it must be warm and fuzzy time.

[central_va]

If you want to look at the old, tired comparison to Rome, homosexuality, acceptance there of and adoption by the 'elites' of Rome was the beginning of the end or the old republic. What came after that was a bizarre combination of socialism and weirdness, blood lust - "bread and circuses". The internet may be playing the role of the circus now.

We are right on track.