Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Good. This should weed out quite a few of the Mittwits too.
I don’t know about whiffs of ozone...but things are getting much more clear.
Still waiting here....
Good example of what happens when morality is rejected and replaced with "anything goes" and "if it feels good, do it". Inevitably a downhill slide commences, ending in the abyss of utter depravity. And cruelty. Real compassion for people who are mentally ill or deeply sunk in depravity is to tell them the truth and offer help and the opportunity to change their lives; not tell them that they're fine as they are.
I request to be pinged, once the draft or completed document is available.
What is clear is that you cannot back up the lie you told about me.
I know this is an emotional issue, and I respect that we have differing views on the subject. That’s what makes it so difficult. At the risk of repeating myself, I do not support the radical homosexual agenda. I find it abhorrent. But I have known many gay people over the years, and some have been just incredibly kind to me and my family. Hating them for private behavior is just not in me.
I've hesitated weighing in on this hoping it would get cleared up, but I think you were included on that post as a courtesy ping....just sayin
You are absolutely correct, LV R.
Just a matter of definition, not “greater” or lesser.
That dog wont hunt.
1512 is the post in which I was accused of defending debauchery. (It was I who mentioned Lord of the Flies)
Still waiting for someone / anyone to show where I defended debauchery.
Lust
Gluttony
Greed
Sloth
Wrath
Envy
Pride
all are deadly...
Andy, you know I have admired your posts here but there is no hate being expressed here...the hate of their influence and the harm and destruction of our Country, yes.
Murder, rape, theft, adultery, it's all the same
A line has to be drawn as Jim just did.
I’ve come to the conclusion that you are purposely lying. Why? For several reasons.
1. You avoid discussion of the actual facts brought up. Time and again.
2. You subtly and not so subtly accuse everyone of “hate”.
3. You bring up how holy and religious you are because you are not full of “hate” like the mean haters here on FR.
The fact is that I used to be very tolerant and didn’t care at all if anyone was a homo or not, I worked with a couple, in fact rented an apartment with someone who turned out to be one.
But when I got hit on by them, when I learned about their agenda, when I learned about their extremely disgusting and loathesome and horrendously unhealthy practices, and how the militant ones (a heckuva lot of them) actively attack anyone who disagrees with them and tries to ruin them - yes, happened to me and people I know - I gave up my tolerance.
And the more I’ve learned about the homo-nazi agenda and how they want to - and are - destroying the freedoms and rights that make our country good - the more I hate the agenda. Anyone who doesn’t hate the homo agenda has something very wrong with them.
Tolerating evil is evil.
And the militant homo-nazi agenda is pure evil.
You claim you do not support the homo agenda and yet on this thread all you’ve done is attack those who are against it.
Case closed.
IOW, they are not directed to you but you were just included in the response.
Oh, one more thing.
You say you do not support the homo agenda, and that we have differing views on the subject.
Well, since I don’t support it, and you say you don’t, how are our views different?
andy58-in-nh said:
Hating them for private behavior is just not in me.
My question to andy58-in-nh is: Besides the troll(s), in what context has anybody mentioned hate?
I have recently seen “homosexualists” used as a word to describe groups which include both homosexuals and heterosexual people who support them. I just saw this word in an article today concerning “gay” masses in a certain church in England. I suppose it’s a recently coined word to describe such a group, I hadn’t seen it before. Perhaps “homosexualism” is relaed to this word.
No one is not or can be not guilty of the sins you outlined, that is why Jesus was sent to save us...
Anyway, looks like there is nothing to clear up...just responding to those who are insisting that FR is just too mean to those groups (homosexuals) who are trying to tell our kids that anal sex is normal and natural.
Oh, and we are evidently bringing back memories of primitive children as depicted in Lord of the Flies, lol.
Let's drop this topic and leave it to other communications...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.