Photos never lie:
Posted on 12/16/2010 1:17:21 PM PST by Cardhu
It's worse than you think.
This conspiracy has no bounds. I know for a fact that John F. Kennedy personally wrote the birth announcements in the Hawaii newspaper.
Lincoln was in on this, too. He deliberately started the Civil War as a means to get the 14th Amendment to back Obama up. He left detailed instructions for the Radical Republicans in the event of his death.
And Washington personally scrubbed out the de Vattel footnote on NBC in the Constitution. His confession is in code on the back of his Inaugural Address.
It's all incontrovertibly true. I know because the talking hamster who sometimes appears to me said so. LOL
Lind’s ruling that the legal authorization for the orders are irrelevant to the lawfulness of the order contradicts 4 different legally-binding sources. When can that ruling be appealed?
If the legal authorization for the orders - which in the case of combat is the President - is irrelevant, then why did Lind even mention anything about Obama? Why did she take judicial notice that Barak Obama (and yes, I spelled that how SHE spelled it) was certified as the electoral winner and took the oath of office? Under her own ruling, shouldn’t that be just as irrelevant as whether he ever “qualified” as required by the 20th Amendment?
Where in her ruling does Obama being “the President” (whether Constitutionally or not) have anything to do with the price of beans in China? She cited no legal reference that brings him into the picture at all - specifically used i under Article 92 “lawfulness” and avoided ii.
Any chance that the guy who is supposed to automatically review Lakin’s case would ever consider any of it? Sounds to me like Puckett was just trying to get the lightest sentence and forget about the bigger issues here.
I suppose whoever is above Lind is just as corruptible as she is. It’s probably useless to expect justice. But I suppose there’s still an obligation to at least try for it.
The talking hamster is in overdrive!
The chances are remote. Puckett likely achieved the lightest sentence for Lakin, and I see no downside to adding evidence about Obama's ineligibility to an appeal that would hurt Lakin but would help in the larger scheme of things.
I suppose whoever is above Lind is just as corruptible as she is. It’s probably useless to expect justice. But I suppose there’s still an obligation to at least try for it.
General Horst, the convening authority, I doubt would take any of this as a factor. It was he who picked the court martial panel.
It didn’t take a time machine for somebody at the Honolulu Advertiser office to create an Advertiser forgery and give a copy to the librarian at the Hawaii State Library (which she then faithfully kept in her drawer, ready to send out to anybody who asked for it, including Lori Starfelt and “infidel granny”).
Apparently it didn’t bother her that it was a forgery, that she was lying about where she got it, OR that the forgery she was given was pristine even though she accurately told others that the HSL microfilms are in such bad shape they are nearly unreadable.
Nor did it take a time machine for him/her to create a forgery for the Star-Bulletin and go on the Prius chat forum, claiming that he/she herself had made the copies from the HSL. He/she had learned from the previous mistakes, though, that the places where the forgery was C&P’ed needed to be covered up better, so he/she added some “scratch lines”.
It was just a little “oops” that the HSL’s Star-Bulletin microfilms as of Feb 2010 didn’t have any of those scratch lines. In fact, the Star-Bulletin microfilms at the HSL are pristine. Funny how prominent scratches just disappear like that.
And then, once that person had forged paper copies for both the Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin, it didn’t take a time travel machine to give copies of both to Michael Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com. He/she did think to remove one of the C&P lines from the left-hand margin but FORGOT to re-scan the document. The borders and paper edge waviness on the scans sent to Rivero are an exact match with the borders and paper edge waviness of the documents that supposedly surfaced from 3 other “independent” sources: from the HSL librarian, from “Koa” at Texas Darlin’ Blog, and from the poster at the Prius Chat Forum . Funny that all those copies are identical, huh?
So there was no time travel involved. Just motive and opportunity. Unfortunately for them, the evidence paints a pretty clear picture of what was done and how.
All the paper copies that were initially shown on the internet came from one person who had access to the archived microfilms for both the Star-Bulletin and Honolulu Advertiser, which were kept at the Advertiser office - both the pristine master copies, and scratched-up copies (since those microfilms at least until 2006 were available to be viewed by the public).
The first written evidence that the microfilms at the Advertiser office were withheld from the public was Starfelt’s statement that she asked to get a copy from the Advertiser office and was told that the microfilms were not available to the public. So we know that sometime between 2006 and 2008 when the Obama “announcements” surfaced, the Advertiser decided to restrict public access to their microfilms. Wonder when that happened and why...
So keep mocking, Lurking Libertarian. The facts are on my side.
“I suppose whoever is above Lind is just as corruptible as she is. It’s probably useless to expect justice.”
Or, Lind was correct in her application of the law rather than corrupt.
And possibly there is the point to consider: Not getting the result you personally wanted doesn’t make the result unjust.
If it was presented as evidence he would have to at least read it, wouldn’t he?
At this point probably the best we can do is to document who had the information and when, so they can be held to account eventually if we can get the country back from this coup.
Eventually - just as at Nuremburg - the responsibility for this lawless coup will have to be figured out, and if people in positions of power were wise they’d start realizing that the war will be over someday and then the books will be opened.
Photos never lie:
I don’t care what results I get. The facts are the facts.
There are 4 legal documents that directly contradict Lind’s ruling.
Does that make no difference to you?
lol. Especially when they’re on the internet.
One of the reasons I’m slow on posting the evidence I’ve got is because I realize that to post it online necessarily means that it could have been photoshopped by me. Although anybody who knows me knows I’m too much of a computer moron to be able to do it. lol.
For Lakin’s counsel I would offer the paper photocopies I’ve got.
Maybe I should ask, is there a way I can post scans on my blog, for instance, where somebody looking at the history of the file - jpeg, or whatever it is - could know that the file had not been photoshopped after being scanned? That it had no opportunity of being altered once it was scanned?
The Factcheck COLB, for instance, had record of it being created in a program that allows editing. Is there any way I can make sure there is no question of whether I falsified the image after I scanned the paper document?
And don't you wonder why? If he were truly guilty the books would have been thrown at him.
Send it to him too.
Don’t you like how polite the language was in this post? Warms me all over. I love it when people forego the Alinsky demonization tactics and actually politely address the actual content, don’t you? ;)
Send it to who all? (I’m sounding Texan/Oklahoman now. Do I send it to y’all, or to ALL y’all? lol)
Send it to General Horst the convening authority who has the power to make the court findings and sentence go away.
There are two parts to his oath. The first part and the most vital is to the Constitution. The second part is to keep the chain of command. Since the two parts ended up contradicting each other his first and proper allegiance is to the Constitution which is the most important. Obama is clearly an impostor and being duty bound to protect the Constitution he properly did everything in his power to stop an usurper and enemy of the USA from continuing his illegal position as Commander and Chief.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.