I don’t care what results I get. The facts are the facts.
There are 4 legal documents that directly contradict Lind’s ruling.
Does that make no difference to you?
Aye, there’s the rub.
They contradict because you say they contradict?
This is where things go off to left field a bit.
The judge doesn’t seem to agree with you. I have yet to see a comment from a JAG or former JAG that agrees with you. Lakin’s lawyer doesn’t even agree with you.
In the course of my life I have learned, occasionally the hard way, that the lay person seldom grasps the true limits of their knowledge on a subject. And that experience has a very real value.
So I find myself generally disinclined to think that that lay persons have a more correct grasp of matters than folks who specialize in those matters.
It’s not that I am blindly trusting “experts”, or think that you are stupid. It’s a simple understanding that I have. When someone deals with a matter for a living they are probably going to have a much better handle on it than someone who does not.
As the old canard goes: The race is not always to the swift, nor the fight to the strong. But, that is the way to bet.