[Undocumented_capitalist]

Can some one explain why homo-sexuals wish to flaunt their sexual preference openly in the military? They can serve now so long as they don’t tell.

As for serving with hetero-sexuals, men and women serve together now, and it has not hurt the military, because if it was hurting it would have been banned.

So why would a openly gay soldier be any worse? Inquiring minds want to know.

[matt1234]

As for serving with hetero-sexuals, men and women serve together now, and it has not hurt the military, because if it was hurting it would have been banned.

Faulty logic.

So why would a openly gay soldier be any worse? Inquiring minds want to know.

If you have to ask that question, I can't help you. Have you ever been in the military? I'm betting not.

[MHGinTN]

N00b, these are sexual degenerates, not gay.That you lack the moral fiber to even recognize the degeneracy that is under debate says a lot about your missing moral compass. The military is one of the last institutions of this Republic which operated on a standard of moral conduct. Apparently, you not only do not recognize that afct but if you acknolwedge it you do not like that it was that way so you’re just fine with degenerating the force to fit the sick degeneracy of the political progressives who also find morality distasteful. You’re disgusting

[MHGinTN]

You opined for us: "They can serve now so long as they don’t tell." Yes, that is where the flaw arises. In a force where integrity is so vital to honor, how is it that you would endorse someone serving in that force so long as they can maintain their degeneracy unexposed? Do you not comprehend that living a lie is what makes these degenerates such a danger? Look at the little queer who stole the files being posted on wikileaks. Why bring another risk factor into a force where honor is bolstered by the integrity of the soldiers, rather than the ability to live a lie like being a sexual degenerate but keeping it secret to fool everyone around you? Disgusting