[MHGinTN]

You opined for us: "They can serve now so long as they don’t tell." Yes, that is where the flaw arises. In a force where integrity is so vital to honor, how is it that you would endorse someone serving in that force so long as they can maintain their degeneracy unexposed? Do you not comprehend that living a lie is what makes these degenerates such a danger? Look at the little queer who stole the files being posted on wikileaks. Why bring another risk factor into a force where honor is bolstered by the integrity of the soldiers, rather than the ability to live a lie like being a sexual degenerate but keeping it secret to fool everyone around you? Disgusting

[Undocumented_capitalist]

That was not my opinion, I was merely stating the law as it exists, passed by the US Congress and signed in by the president. I hope you are intelligent enough to comprehend the difference between opinion and stating existing fact.

Personally, I detest homo-sexuality, and never understood it. Again, the issue before the congress is REPEAL of DADT. That turncoat who leaked to wikileaks and his types are free to join the military as IT EXISTS NOW. Obviously the military has no problem with discreet homo-sexuals.

My post was mainly to question why the homo’s want to come out of the closet in military. Don’t they understand it will subject them to ridicule and worse, harassment.

Finally, I have come across many news items of sexual harassment of female soldiers by straight male soldiers. If the military can tolerate that on what basis can the military say that repeal of DADT will be any worse?