Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World Net Daily fabricates a "Missile" Contrail tale
Faith, Reason, and Health ^ | 12/12/2010 | Dr. Brian Kopp

Posted on 12/12/2010 10:47:16 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM

World Net Daily fabricates a "Missile" Contrail tale

I've been following the California contrail saga closely since the original video was captured in early November. I was never fully satisfied with any of the explanations, so I tracked down the two known first hand eyewitnesses and spoke to them about what they actually witnessed. As a result of these interviews, I contacted World Net Daily (because they were still writing about the subject a month later, from the bias that the contrail was indeed a missile, and I had written for them once before) and asked them if they would be interested in an article based on these first hand eyewitness accounts. They asked me to submit my article, and were eager to use it.

At this point, I was thoroughly convinced that the contrail was nothing more than UPS flight 902, back-lit by the setting sun. The object remained in view to the eyewitnesses far too long to have represented a missile launch, despite several credible military experts who had stated the contrary. Because WND was following the lead of these experts, and continued to insist the contrail was a missile exhaust plume, I knew I had to be extremely diplomatic in presenting a countering view, if I wanted them to actually publish it. So I used terminology that was deliberately non-committal.

Furthermore, Gil Leyvas had given freely of his time in presenting his side of the debate, and was very kind and gracious during our phone interview as well as multiple subsequent email exchanges, so I wanted him to have "his day in court." I gave him a lot of column space to explain his perspective.

Here is the article, as I submitted it to WND, with the graphics I recommended (the first of which was graciously supplied by FreeRepublic.com poster TXnMA) and for which I had obtained permission. I was not blatantly militating for the airliner contrail argument, because WND would not have published such an article, but any objective reader would see from the manner in which I presented the facts that, despite Leyvas' good faith, the evidence underpinning the "missile exhaust plume" side of the debate was exceedingly weak at best:

California contrail: Four conflicting eyewitness reports

One month after the KCBS video purporting to show a missile contrail off the coast of California went viral, a heated debate over what exactly created the contrail persists. Experts have offered convincing analysis supporting the theory that the contrail represents an SLBM launch, while internet pundits have assembled a formidable collection of evidence that the contrail was created by UPS flight 902. The debate is seemingly at an impasse, and it might be a good time to step back from the intense data analysis and review the basic facts of November 8, 2010.

There are two known eyewitnesses who captured images of the contrail. Gil Leyvas is the helicopter camera man for KCBS in Los Angeles who videotaped the contrail and Rick Warren lives on Long Beach and photographed the contrail from his tenth story balcony. A 50 minute phone interview with Leyvas was obtained for this report and discussed further via email, and Warren was also contacted by email.

According to Leyvas, his video was obtained while filming a sunset view for a KCBS weather report. As he was filming, Leyvas noticed an object on the horizon that appeared to be climbing vertically out of the ocean, and he zoomed in on the object. He videotaped the contrail for a total of ten minutes and subsequently continued to view the contrail for an additional ten minutes. Leyvas maintains that the object itself that created the contrail only remained in view for two to three minutes. For 30 to 45 seconds, the object glowed brightly and then seemed to disappear from view. His initial impression was that the object was traveling east towards the coast. On reviewing the video later, he had the impression the object may instead have been heading away from the coast, towards the northwest.

The highly unusual appearance of the sunset contrail shown on TV and posted online, combined with Leyvas’ perception that the object creating the contrail only remained in view for two to three minutes, constitutes the primary basis upon which many observers believe the object was a Sub Launched Ballistic Missile.

Rick Warren wasn’t sure what the object was that he was photographing on November 8th. “I was shooting with a telephoto lens and looking through a viewfinder so I never really saw the separation of the object and the contrail until I looked at the photos, but I’m sure that this whole thing lasted way too long to be a missile. I see lots of contrails from my 10th floor balcony but the difference in this one was that it “seemed” to be going up.”

Having seen many contrails, what stood out for Warren was the vertical nature of the contrail, not that it looked like a missile exhaust plume. Some of his photos of the contrail were posted on the local ABC7 website, and were utilized by Mick West of Contrailscience.com to create a composite image of the flight progression of the object. The time stamps on Warren’s photos were used to establish that the object creating the contrail remained in view for 4 minutes 43 seconds in Warren’s photos. Based on altitude and position, the object first appeared in Leyvas’ video at least five minutes prior to Warren’s photos. After seeing West’s analysis of the images, Warren says, “I’m now of the opinion that it was indeed a plane."

At this point, one of the most glaring discrepancies between these eyewitness accounts must be addressed. Most observers looking at Warren’s images agree that the small dark object which appears at the top of each of his later photos is the same craft creating the plume that was seen in his earlier photos as well as that which was seen in Leyvas’ video.

If the object that created the contrail was still visible in Warren’s photos, then the object itself is not likely to have been a missile. Solid fuel engines such as those used in an SLBM create an uninterrupted exhaust plume for two to three minutes, after which time the solid fuel is spent, and the missile is usually out of view.

On the other hand, when an airliner transitions from cold moist air to warmer drier air, the dew point changes and contrail formation decreases. In the case of USP902, the airliner would have been transitioning from moist cool air at altitude over the ocean to warmer, drier air over land. This could explain the contrail disappearing as the object moved farther east.

Mick West created a "chronological cut" of Leyvas’ video and posted it to YouTube. The transition from moist cool air over the ocean to warmer, drier air over land may have occurred at 1:17 to 1:20 of the chronological cut, which Warren referred to as “the separation of the object and the contrail.” When still images from Leyvas’ video are compared to the overlay of Warren’s photos, there is a remarkable similarity and continuity between the two sets of images, providing a better time frame for Leyvas’ video within the context of Warren’s time stamps:








When Leyvas was initially queried regarding these later photos, he replied,

“…the [Contrailscience composite] animation … only shows the path the plume drifted and not anything in flight. The 30-45 seconds of video I captured in which I could see the object (the portion of the video showing the glow/flame of the object at its pinnacle) occurred 8-10 minutes prior to the animated images of the animation (if the time stamps are accurate). I have no way of telling if those time stamps are accurate since the raw video has no real-time time stamp associated with it. I can only go by an estimated time based on the time we launched out of John Wayne airport and the approximate time of our weather shot. My guess is that the time stamps are relatively close to the accurate time. However, what you are seeing in those images is the plume drifting and not anything in flight.

Leyvas still maintains the object creating the contrail is not visible in Warren’s photos 8 to 10 minutes later:

”The separate smaller trail that is separate from the main body of the plume and that was captured by Warren in his photos, which makes it seem as if the object continued in flight, appears in my video to possibly be the top portion of the plume that partly dissipates leaving a segment of the tip adrift - detached from the main body of the plume. (I highlight "possibly be" because during that portion of the video, I zoom in and out and pan off and back onto the plume, so I'm not sure if what we are seeing is a stage of separation like that of a missile or if it's the tip of the plume separating from the main portion). I did zoom into that portion to see if I could see a craft of some kind (at the time I thought that there was a chance the object was still making condensation/exhaust) but there was nothing there creating that segment. Had there been, I know I would have been able to see it with the high-powered lens I was using. Add to that - if it was traveling toward us, the closer it would come the easier it would be to see it, but there was nothing there. That's why I said it was merely the plume adrift and not anything continuously flying.

“Though there was no time code associated with the raw footage I shot, you are still able to accurately time the footage from the moment I started the recording (as we departed John Wayne airport) to the final moments of the mystery missile story. When I play the video I can time the duration of the object in flight which was between 30-45 seconds of "Glow Time" - which is inclusive within, and at the end of the 2-3 minute estimated flight time from which the plume was visible at the horizon ... I can rely on the raw footage as it plays to gauge my estimated times since it plays back in real time on the player deck's control track timer.”

There were also two unknown witnesses who captured images of the contrail, both anonymous posters on the image hosting website Flickr. A photographer on Hermosa Beach, north of Leyvas and Warren, uploaded a photo of the November 8 sunset and only subsequently realized he had captured the same contrail due to media reports. From his vantage point, without the setting sun directly back-lighting the contrail, it apparently appeared similar to the other contrails in his sunset photo.

Another anonymous photographer uploaded photos of clouds at sunset on November 8, and noticed a bright horizontal contrail that he subsequently associated with the media reports regarding the contrail. Notice that in the case of these latter two eyewitnesses, the first noted nothing unusual about the contrail until he read media reports about it, and the second viewed a horizontal, not vertical contrail.

Finally, the opinions of the known military experts must be taken into consideration. Several highly credible experts have stated their opinion that the contrail in question represented the launching of an SLBM.

A little further background from Leyvas might shed more light on the way the video was edited and presented to the public. Leyvas related that the video was taken during sweeps week in his TV market, and part of his job during sweeps week is to go out and look for and capture video of interest for sweeps week ratings. The video he captured of the contrail was subsequently heavily edited before being aired, and less than two minutes of the ten minutes of video has been seen by these experts. From the perspective of garnering sweeps week ratings, the footage was certainly successful.

It may be that the experts would modify their opinion based on viewing the entire footage. The footage is owned by the local CBS affiliate and nothing was found by the Department of Defense in reviewing the footage that would prevent its release to the public. According to Leyvas, it might still be available on their server. If that is the case, it should just be a matter of uploading the unedited ten minutes of video to YouTube to put an end to the debate.



Now compare the article I composed and submitted above to the sensationalistic manipulated (and frankly, fabricated) version WND actually published:
MATTERS OF NATIONAL SECURITY
Mysterious missile launch baffles even eyewitnesses
Video, still photographers watched contrail soaring over Pacific Coast


One thing to note, as I implied in my original closing paragraph. Both CBS and WND know that Gil Leyvas has a back up copy of the original unedited ten minutes of raw footage. CBS knows they duped credible military experts into stating publicly that the contrail was formed by a missile by deliberately editing the raw footage for ratings. CBS has also conveniently let the impression persist from the first week that the video was seized by the Department of Defense for analysis (implying they no longer had a copy.)

WND also knows from my correspondence with them that a back-up copy exists, but they left that important fact out of their version of the story.

Frankly, both media outlets are acting like ... typical mainstream media outlets.

I never trusted CBS to begin with.

Unfortunately, I can no longer trust World Net Daily as a news source.

And I sure as heck will never submit anything to them in the future for publication.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; californiamissile; contrail; jetcontrail; md11contrail; missile; missilemystery; mysterymissile; notamissile; tinfoilbrigade; toldyouso; ups902; worldnetdaily; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-650 next last
To: TXnMA

You protest way to much to be what you are trying to appear to be....

Life has consequences.


621 posted on 12/18/2010 10:19:28 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

You protest way, way too much to be what you are trying to appear to be....


622 posted on 12/18/2010 10:20:56 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: fabian; Yardstick; Tommyjo
"...thank you for your service but I think you and the other guy have a screw loose on this one! For some strange reason..."

~~~~~~~~

We post scientific, provably accurate, factual materials -- and have a bit of fun with the irrational responses of folks who vehemently insist on seeing the sinister -- where only the routine and benign exists -- and it is we who "have a screw loose".

To quote Artie Johnson: "Werrrry interestink!" '-)

BTW, my family and I say, "Thanks for noticing!" :-)

623 posted on 12/18/2010 10:25:23 PM PST by TXnMA (Scientist. Creationist. Apologizing for neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
You are also a liar. Here is my response. The very next post from yours.

Yes you replied to my #556 (which I linked to) in your #557. But you were not responsive to it. You did not address it squarely, but instead tried to fog things up by demanding compass points and other irrelevant details.

I then explained in my next reply why those details were irrelevant.

You then asked for the position of the helicopter (which had already been established in approximate terms), which TXnMA provided, and which validated my argument.

After that you fell silent, and you have not addressed it again since then.

624 posted on 12/18/2010 10:39:39 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Yardstick; Tommyjo
"I actually cited you on that and pinged you to it so you have no excuse for not knowing it."

Why , you sho' nuff did -- when it served your own purpose -- 134 posts after your slander -- and (still) with zero mention of same...

I have mentioned "intellectual honesty" several times on these threads. It's a great thing. I recommend it highly. You should try it some time -- starting with being honest with your self...

625 posted on 12/18/2010 10:39:47 PM PST by TXnMA (Scientist. Creationist. Apologizing for neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
You are also a liar. Here is my response. The very next post from yours.

I should add that I linked to my post (#556) rather than directly to your reply (#557, which was right under it) to make sure it was clear what you were replying to.

You're on a hair trigger with that liar thing.

626 posted on 12/18/2010 10:56:26 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

You are welcome...and nobody has disproved anything. And even the Air force said they did not know what it was...if it was a plane they would have dispelled all and said so. THe contrail began at the bottom unlike a plane and the immediate trajectory was not that of a commercial plane....as I said , you guys have some screws loose..please tighten or all of your commonsense may spill out!


627 posted on 12/18/2010 11:03:00 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: Halgr

LOL! I’m having way, way too much fun to be anything else. ‘-)


628 posted on 12/18/2010 11:03:47 PM PST by TXnMA (Scientist. Creationist. Apologizing for neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA; TigersEye
...134 posts after...

Right, two days later, when it became useful to him to do so. He used your analysis to counter another poster.

OTOH, maybe better late than never.

629 posted on 12/18/2010 11:12:47 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: Halgr
You protest way to much to be what you are trying to appear to be....

Really? I thought TXnMA's response to you was pretty restrained.

630 posted on 12/18/2010 11:25:21 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: fabian
THe contrail began at the bottom unlike a plane...

Unlike which plane, exactly?


631 posted on 12/20/2010 9:20:28 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

A commercial plane which you guys think it is! DAAAA...


632 posted on 12/20/2010 7:05:50 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Nothing for 2 days? Have you given up?

Do you have any data yet? LOL


633 posted on 12/20/2010 8:58:59 PM PST by Sto Zvirat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: Sto Zvirat

Caught himself lying to himself, and can’t figure out who to deflect the blame to... ‘-}


634 posted on 12/23/2010 10:49:19 AM PST by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
I caught you lying right here.
635 posted on 12/23/2010 7:34:35 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Sto Zvirat; Yardstick; Tommyjo

Give us your bridge number and we’ll send sympathy cards... ‘-)


636 posted on 12/24/2010 8:17:14 AM PST by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Uh oh, Rick Warren just sent me an email noting he uploaded two more contrails, photographed yesterday (click on the photos to see a larger version):

637 posted on 12/28/2010 7:38:27 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM (Liberalism is infecund.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Man, that’s one busy Chinese sub, huh?


638 posted on 12/28/2010 7:41:16 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Thanks! Beautiful sunset!

TWO more?!? Can you share the URL where he uploaded them? Too bad he isn't a bit farther south...

639 posted on 12/28/2010 8:47:38 AM PST by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

BTW, Brian, I hope you noticed that your thread long ago passed the coveted “500 responses” mark... ‘-)


640 posted on 12/28/2010 10:45:36 AM PST by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-650 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson