To: TXnMA
Uh oh, Rick Warren just sent me an email noting he uploaded two more contrails, photographed yesterday (click on the photos to see a larger version):
![](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8SJPjCbt-YM/TRn-rpqaTLI/AAAAAAAAAmU/EA1M0FFTmB8/s320/Rick%2BWarren%2BDec%2B27b.jpg)
![](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_8SJPjCbt-YM/TRn-rXuwLYI/AAAAAAAAAmM/aCUwQSPkUwU/s320/Rick%2Bwarren%2BDec%2B27a.jpg)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Man, that’s one busy Chinese sub, huh?
638 posted on
12/28/2010 7:41:16 AM PST by
aruanan
To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Thanks! Beautiful sunset!
TWO more?!? Can you share the URL where he uploaded them? Too bad he isn't a bit farther south...
639 posted on
12/28/2010 8:47:38 AM PST by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp
BTW, Brian, I hope you noticed that your thread long ago passed the coveted “500 responses” mark... ‘-)
640 posted on
12/28/2010 10:45:36 AM PST by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp
The same type weather pattern (cold/wet) moved into the area yesterday that had been prevalent during the first ‘mystery missile’.
Lo and behold, a similar contrail appears, around the same general time/area/flight path. Coincidence?
Or have the Chinese now created a hover-submarine?
To: Dr. Brian Kopp; aruanan; Yardstick; lbahneman; Rokke; Tommyjo
I used "difference-mode transparency" (plus a 150% re-scaling of the smaller one) to align & composite Rick's latest two images. Then I applied a bit of quick pixel-level quantitative analysis (at the larger photo's resolution) to the composite. It has several features of interest:
![](http://www.microlith.com/CONtrail/RWDecComp-1.jpg)
http://www.microlith.com/CONtrail/RWDecComp-1.jpg
- That little "high-wing puddle-jumper" crossing the FOV (Field Of View) provides a dramatic illustraion of the effect of distance/perspective on apparent angular velocity: The "Hi-wing's" apparent AV across the FOV is 16X that of the contrail maker.
- From the perspective in these frames, the contrail-maker ("CMO") almost seems to be "losing ground" -- as far as progress toward the coast goes. Obviously, that jet is not actually "crawling" WRT the light plane...
- In the first shot, the CMO exhibits the same "exhaust flame" reflection seen in a few frames of the CBS hoax video. (See 3X "lens" circle at right...)
- In the second shot, the CMO may be right at the point of "separation from" the long contrail (see "lens")...
- There seems to ba a strong wind to the south -- at altitude -- as in the 08NOV incident. Does that mean that similar "cold front" conditions were in effect? (If so, it would seem that we have a useful predictor as to when the next similar event might occur...)
I have no doubt that significantly more information can be extracted from Rick's "Raw" photos. (Please pass this post along to Rick. I hope we can get together to collaborate on the analysis...)
643 posted on
12/28/2010 11:33:40 AM PST by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp
That is so obviously a missile. Just look at how the sunlight reflects off the spiraling smoke trail as the missile flies west toward its North Korean motherland. But it wasn't launched by a sub, because it doesn't start on the horizon. I think it was dropped out of the back of a transport plane. Or maybe a chinook helicopter. /sarcasm off
![](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8SJPjCbt-YM/TRn-rpqaTLI/AAAAAAAAAmU/EA1M0FFTmB8/s320/Rick%2BWarren%2BDec%2B27b.jpg)
645 posted on
12/29/2010 3:12:00 PM PST by
Rokke
(www.therightreasons.net)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson