Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina wants a 'more presidential' Palin
Washington Examiner ^ | 9 Dec 2010 | Byron York 1

Posted on 12/10/2010 7:35:51 AM PST by mandaladon

If Sarah Palin wants to win the Republican nomination for president, she'll have to do well in South Carolina.

The state's first-in-the-South primary is a key indicator of a candidate's strength in the GOP's strongest region. In a state filled with social conservatives, veterans, and spending hawks, a candidate has to prove that he or she can appeal to a large swath of the Republican primary electorate.

So how would Palin do? "It's not a clear picture," says Oran Smith, head of the Palmetto Family Council, the state's top organization of social conservatives. Smith points to his group's 15-member board of directors as a cross section of South Carolina voters -- the last time around, there were McCain supporters, Huckabee supporters, Romney supporters and others. Now, Smith says, "They like Palin's values, but they're still hoping she can make herself more viable in the sense that she is a little more knowledgeable and a little more presidential. They're not going to be interested in her simply because she's conservative and nice and popular."

Of course, the council's board is not exactly a rank-and-file group. Ask Smith about the group's supporters across the state -- the people who donate money, respond to e-mail appeals, and are among the most conservative voters in South Carolina -- and the reading on Palin is more upbeat, but not without reservations. "She's wildly popular," Smith says. Even so, the ties between Palin and potential supporters are still a little tenuous. "I think they're not fully on board with her as a candidate," Smith says, "but deep down they would like to be."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; freepressforpalin; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Sarah is going to surprise a lot of people

mandalas,mandala,palin

PalinGenesis


1 posted on 12/10/2010 7:35:54 AM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

There is nothing Presidential in our White House right now, IMO.


2 posted on 12/10/2010 7:37:36 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Oran Smith is probably a Huck booster.


3 posted on 12/10/2010 7:40:26 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Compared to Zero, Sarah can be way more “presidential”.
(Hell, my dog acts more presidential than that con man we have in office now!)


4 posted on 12/10/2010 7:42:18 AM PST by ozark hilljilly (Had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

“South Carolina wants a ‘more presidential’ Palin”

####

Yeah, well South Carolina, I want a more heterosexual Senator, than Foppsey.


5 posted on 12/10/2010 7:42:34 AM PST by EyeGuy (RaceMarxist Obama: The Politics of Vengeance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

As a South Carolinian, I also wish that!!!


6 posted on 12/10/2010 7:44:18 AM PST by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

What is “more presidential”? It’s as ambiguous as “not qualified” or “not experienced”. Is Huckabee, playing his guitar on his show on Fox “presidential”? Why should Palin act “more presidential” when she hasn’t even declared her candidacy? This is all such nonsense...


7 posted on 12/10/2010 7:45:56 AM PST by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

“Going back to 1980, every winner of the South Carolina presidential primary has gone on to capture the GOP nomination.”


8 posted on 12/10/2010 7:49:18 AM PST by thedudesatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I’d like a more presidential rest of the field. Funny, that.


9 posted on 12/10/2010 7:49:31 AM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: BOOM. Taste My Cluebat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Hey SC. I got two words for you. Lindsey Graham.
10 posted on 12/10/2010 7:52:12 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
I find it amusing how the media (including supposed conservatives) micro-analyses everything about Sarah Palin.

Why don't they ask so-called “opinion leaders” like Oran Smith, head of the Palmetto Family Council, how they feel about Mitt Romney not offering his opinion on any controversial issues.

11 posted on 12/10/2010 7:53:27 AM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon; onyx; ExTexasRedhead

If they found out who was “coaching” her on domestic and foreign affairs, she’d be called a “fundamentalist Christian” who wants to take us back to the 19th Century and take away women’s “reproductive rights” and a “Neo-Con” who wants to go to war with the whole Middle East or the like. Watch and see.


12 posted on 12/10/2010 7:59:59 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I’m hoping that Palin has a detailed plan for the evolution of her public image. I’ve been a big fan of Palin since about six months after she became Governor, hoping that she would move to a national political role.

We all saw the gap between her experience (not values, not ability, but raw experience dealing with evil) and the level necessary to deal with our anti-American media. In her first few national interviews, she looked to me like someone caught completely off guard, like she expected a friendly conversation that would be edited in a professional manner to tell the true story of who she was and what she believed instead of what she encountered (an ambush designed to elicit answers that could be edited for the specific purpose of making her look bad). Considering the unexpected nature of those first few sets of questions, I didn’t think she did a terrible job - certainly not great, but not terrible. When she and her children were attacked with an insane level of venom, she dealt with it remarkably well and stood up to the hateful liberals. I liked that, but it gave them a chance to call her “divisive”.

In round 2, members of McCain’s staff and other RINOs went after her too. She’s handled that well and been a major force in reshaping the GOP under the Tea Party banner. We’re not done, but there is far more hope than I would have guessed just two years ago.

Today, she has her Internet and Twitter connections to her supporters. She has Sarah Palin’s Alaska to portray herself as a real person and get around the most remarkable level of media bias in our country’s history. She has her books, which are selling very well. I’m hoping that she also has a plan. Part of that is to project “presidential”, and I’m hoping her planned foreign travel is part of a conscious agenda to build that image (and the understanding through personal travel experience to match that image). What else should be on that agenda? Good question, and I hope Sarah has the answer and that some on FR have inside access and will provide those suggestions to her.


13 posted on 12/10/2010 8:01:12 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

SC lost all credibility with graham.

LLS


14 posted on 12/10/2010 8:03:38 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Great Post!


15 posted on 12/10/2010 8:06:05 AM PST by thedudesatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

Can I second that??


16 posted on 12/10/2010 8:06:47 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan ("Sorry I'm late. I had to stop by the wax museum to give the finger to FDR!" C.Hill (Palin '12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Christine O’Donnell is a more presidential SP! She’s cute and sassy! She is also unemployed and maybe we can get her cheap.


17 posted on 12/10/2010 8:11:25 AM PST by HospiceNurse (Draft O'Donnell 4 President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
"South Carolina wants a 'more presidential' Palin"

South Carolina ISN'T the only state in the union...
18 posted on 12/10/2010 8:12:37 AM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

You are exactly right.

She deserves our utmost gratitude for rescuing the Republican party from obscurity (and for helping to move it clearly back towards it’s principles)

Without her, McCain would have lost by 20 points and conservatives would still be painted with the brush of a failed Bush presidency.

Palin and the Tea Party gave us a clean break from Bush, that’s why Obama’s continued blame game has no resonance. We’ve gone back to being real conservatives. (This is a conservative nation)

Now I think Palin is working a brilliant strategy designed to reintroduce her to middle America and let them see the real Sarah and her family.

She is way out front confronting Obama and his socialist agenda. She alone has the ability to shape the public debate with a single facebook posting.

She will win the nomination in a cakewalk and the White House in a landslide.

It’s going to be fun to watch.


19 posted on 12/10/2010 8:22:23 AM PST by t-dude (Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

Is Romney paying you?

If not you are a sucker.

You could be makin’ some good cabbage with your posts. Romney is desperate enough.


20 posted on 12/10/2010 8:25:00 AM PST by t-dude (Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson