1 posted on
11/30/2010 3:23:27 AM PST by
Rome2000
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Rome2000
Medved hopping on the MYTH train.
2 posted on
11/30/2010 3:24:40 AM PST by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: Rome2000
He’s the only one I wouldn’t vote for.
3 posted on
11/30/2010 3:25:02 AM PST by
livius
To: Rome2000
They’re trying to pick our 2012 candidate again!
Mitt will lose and Obama will Rule and finish The US off!!
4 posted on
11/30/2010 3:25:36 AM PST by
timetostand
(Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
To: Al B.; Lakeshark; onyx; Brices Crossroads; Clyde5445
To: Rome2000
If it is Mitt we are voting 3rd party. No point in voting for whitey 0bama.
11 posted on
11/30/2010 3:33:50 AM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Rome2000
a mainstream conservative generally acceptable to many tea party insurgentNOT!
IMHO, the ONLY acceptable tea party insurgent has a TV show on Sunday's at 9PM on the Discovery Channel! She gets her hands dirty!
Myth wears funny underwear and wants to be god...
13 posted on
11/30/2010 3:35:32 AM PST by
WVKayaker
(Remember that the faith that moves mountains always carries a pick.)
To: Rome2000
Gingrich in 2012
“To Save America”
To: Rome2000
Flush Mitt, it’s a stinking turd!
15 posted on
11/30/2010 3:35:56 AM PST by
dalereed
To: Rome2000
The author seem to forget Reagan’s run
Also Palin can easily be considered the runner up, “her turn” candidate from the last election, not romney or huckabee
17 posted on
11/30/2010 3:38:13 AM PST by
4rcane
To: Rome2000
Here is another history lesson. RINOs LOSE to charismatic Democrats.
20 posted on
11/30/2010 3:39:29 AM PST by
CDFingers
(0bama calls me the enemy, but won't do the same with terrorist.)
To: Rome2000
Here is another history lesson. RINOs LOSE to charismatic Democrats.
21 posted on
11/30/2010 3:39:29 AM PST by
CDFingers
(0bama calls me the enemy, but won't do the same with terrorist.)
To: Rome2000
My nightmare scenario is that Romney and Palin will split the anti-Obama vote (with one of them running as a third party candidate) and Obama will win again.
I think there are a sizable number of “establishment Republicans” who would strongly prefer being the minority opposition to Obama than having to give up control of their party to the “rabble” represented by grassroots conservatives.
I hope my nightmare scenario does not come to pass.
22 posted on
11/30/2010 3:39:59 AM PST by
cvq3842
(I don't waste my vote on third party candidates, like RINO Republicans.)
To: Rome2000
24 posted on
11/30/2010 3:42:40 AM PST by
steve8714
(Never again should free men be asked to fight for those without the courage to turn them loose.)
To: Rome2000
Mitt’s history. It is obvious to all but the leftists that the voters want to take our government to the Right.
25 posted on
11/30/2010 3:44:30 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Rome2000
For 2012, that means Mitt's the man.
26 posted on
11/30/2010 3:45:19 AM PST by
COBOL2Java
(Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
To: Rome2000
I do think there’s a place for a guy like Romney in a GOP administration. He’d be great over at Treasury, IMHO. But at the top of the ticket? Not my choice at all.
28 posted on
11/30/2010 3:48:56 AM PST by
DemforBush
(If I ever get back my blue jeans...Lord, how happy could one man be?)
To: Rome2000
IOW, History says the GOP will blow it in 2012.
29 posted on
11/30/2010 3:49:37 AM PST by
Junior_G
(Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
To: Rome2000
If the GOP nominates another rich old white man to slap down a black president many underdog voters will slap back on that point alone. If the GOP nominates a Hispanic along the lines of Marc Rubio then Barky can’t win. A woman candidate has a chance. The political timing isn’t right for another rich old white man that strangely wants it too bad.
30 posted on
11/30/2010 3:50:25 AM PST by
Reeses
To: Rome2000
Does this Medved guy actually have an audience?
31 posted on
11/30/2010 3:51:24 AM PST by
Godebert
To: Rome2000
Ummm, the Huckster was the runner up, not Mitty. (Not that I’d vote for either.)
By the article’s own definitions, Mitt’s toast.
But.
You could read from the article how Sarah fits the described mold.
Just saying.
34 posted on
11/30/2010 3:53:44 AM PST by
ziravan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson