Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightSideNews

Too bad we need an Amendment to support the existing 10th Amendment.


20 posted on 11/26/2010 1:48:00 PM PST by freedumb2003 (In case you don't know, everything I post is IMHO -- YOU JACKWAGON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003; RightSideNews

“Too bad we need an Amendment to support the existing 10th Amendment.”

It’s being ignored by Congress and the SCOTUS. Perhaps it needs to be restated. Anything that will limit the federal monster, I am for. This was the beauty and logic of our nation’s founding documents. Anything that will strengthen states relative to the feds, I’m for.

As to RightSide’s comment about the implication of this for CA and NY, it’s not the limiting of federal laws and power that’s the problem for those ‘insane’ majorities.


52 posted on 11/26/2010 3:55:07 PM PST by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003
Too bad we need an Amendment to support the existing 10th Amendment.

Agreed. As the Constitution and it's amendments are ignored now, why should I believe a new one wouldn't also be ignored?

Judges have to be reigned in some way.

The French knew what to do about royal abuse of power on the night of July 14, 1789.

64 posted on 11/26/2010 4:32:47 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson