[butterdezillion]

This is why when defending the US Constitution according to their oaths, military officers MUST confront whether their Commander-in-Chief is Constitutionally qualified for the job. If he is not, then they themselves become the weapon a tyrant uses AGAINST the Constitution and the American people.

Podesta accidentally revealed why no military person should obey this Kenyan who was put in place by coup - never having met the Constitution’s 2 procedural qualifications to become POTUS (being lawfully certified as the electoral winner, and “qualifying” before Jan 20th)

[Nachum]

“Seven Days In May” scenario?

[Jacquerie]

Don’t worry. Lakin will be found guilty, for guilty he is.

[American Constitutionalist]

" This is why when defending the US Constitution according to their oaths, military officers MUST confront whether their Commander-in-Chief is Constitutionally qualified for the job. If he is not, then they themselves become the weapon a tyrant uses AGAINST the Constitution and the American people. "

Could a ineligible CiC who gave these orders just say that his EO can not be illegal or against the Constitution since he was not under the authority of the US Constitution in the first place ?

In other words, a ineligible CiC can say that his EO can't violate the US Constitution since he was not acting under the authority of the US Constitution since he is ineligible.