Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazing Interview: Air Force General says "Sub Launched Missile, 100% Certain"
Fox News Interview with Air Force General Tom McInerney | November 14th 2010 | Fox News Hannity Interview

Posted on 11/13/2010 2:55:59 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009

Hannity was surprised to hear a famous ex Air Force General tell him “That Is A Missile, Shot From A Submarine!” I quote retired Air Force Lieutenant General Tom McInerney (ex commander of 11th Air Force in Alaska) “I spent 35 years flying fighters, and you can see the guidance system kick in, I have watched that film 10 times, I am absolutely certain that that is not an aircraft, but a sub launch ICBM missile!!!” See the video and judge his words for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LivRJOWrcpA&feature=player_embedded#! I will next post a clickable link.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2manykooks; california; californiamissile; contrail; contrailconmen; dailynutjobthread; freerepublickooks; freerepublickooksite; generalmcinerney; genmcinerney; icbm; kooks; launch; losangeles; mcinerney; missile; missilemystery; mysterymissile; terrorism; tommcinerney; underwater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 1,461 next last
To: justa-hairyape

odd should be odds


1,381 posted on 11/18/2010 7:29:32 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1380 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
BTW, did you ever think to ask yourself why that "plume" is still brightly lighted?

Better question is why he over saturated the color of the plume ? Anyone who sees that knows the image was played with by an amateur in photoshop. No professional would ever release an image like that. We need the raw unaltered images assuming he still has them. He has numerous other images where he cranked up the brightness and caused over saturation. But if he wants to leave tell tale signs he is amateur photo shopper, so be it.

1,382 posted on 11/18/2010 7:34:46 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1303 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
What you say is wrong and ridiculous and needlessly insulting...

What I say is based on 28 years of first hand experience in the US Air Force (the last 3 1/2 at the Pentagon).

1,383 posted on 11/18/2010 7:39:37 AM PST by Fundamentally Fair (If exercising the right to free speech invites violence, then girls in short skirts invite rape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1267 | View Replies]

To: lbahneman
The camera is a service provided by Countryman & McDaniel law firm, not LAX. I would imagine updating a free webcam they operate is not exactly high on their IT laundry list.

Do you have the raw unaltered images that you did not photoshop ?

Does their camera have an oversaturation problem ?

1,384 posted on 11/18/2010 7:42:08 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1316 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Tommyjo

I’m about ready to share my first pass analysis of the video editing. It is really something else! Timestamps would blow their whole scam...


1,385 posted on 11/18/2010 9:40:14 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

You do realize the time stamps shown to the public are the time stamps that they are airing the recorded video to the public. Not the actual filming time stamps. You can only get the real filming time stamps from the original video. And only CBS has that. And this is not a scam. This is a life and death situation. And if the Chinese are indeed involved, .... You might want to think about that for a little bit, now.


1,386 posted on 11/18/2010 10:01:33 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Perhaps a request to station to *really* release the raw video (not their previously released edited “raw” video). Along with the altituted and coordinates of the helicopter.

If they won’t release them, why not?


1,387 posted on 11/18/2010 10:16:37 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Perhaps a request to station to *really* release the raw video (not their previously released edited “raw” video). Along with the altitute and coordinates of the helicopter.

If they won’t release them, why not?


1,388 posted on 11/18/2010 10:16:47 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape; lbahneman; Finny; TigersEye; DontTreadOnMe2009; All; D-fendr; Mr. Silverback; ...
"Do you know what the odds of them being aligned are?"

If you are talking about the plane and its flight path, I would be 100% amazed if they did not align. I frankly don't see your problem with Warren's photos and Uncinus' Google Earth work. And I see the plane in the Warren composite as being only aligned with the first (yellow, brightly lighted) plume on the right.

BTW, I don't know the plume drift rate; if you do, please share it.

"So when we have the data, you deny the data. When we don't have the data, you create the data out of thin air." Those lies are not appreciated! :-(

As for the color hypersaturation and color shifts, I have the same questions about many frames in the videos.

Re saturation in the Warren photos: I tried "stacking" some of the video clips, and found that, no matter which transparency mode I used for the composite (after using "difference" mode for alignment), some of the colors always oversaturated. IMHO, it is the nature of the beast of image stacking -- without going to a LOT of work to avoid it... (FYI, I don't use Photoshop.)

FYI, I use blowup of the wide view and stacking to register and locate a zoom-in on the wide view. You should see some results soon...

There's no magic -- and certainly no deception -- to this stuff -- just a lot of repetitive, tedious detail work.

At least we have been working and trying to come up with answers and understanding-- and not just sniping and shouting over and over, "It's a missile!"

~~~~~~~~~~

Might as well get this out: All this questioning of hard-working folks' motives, and accusations of fakery are getting mighty da*n tiresome... Most of us are just FReepers, not professionals at this stuff, (who is?) and are just doing the best we can to make sense of this thing...

~~~~~~~~~~

BTW, I believe it was lbahneman who, a short while ago, posted links to Warren's raw images. Go back and check for yourself... Don't know about Warren, but, at this stage of analysis, I am much more concerned with alignment and registration in composites than I am with mere color anomalies...

1,389 posted on 11/18/2010 10:44:16 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1380 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
Why don't you show the video to some people who teach and understand perspective and lighting as per earth's horizon and sunlight -- not an armchair theorist who will "do the math" because it's a hobby and they have an agenda to prove how much smarter they are than the idiots who think a conspiracy is going on, but someone who actually makes a living by understanding lighting and perspective. Ask them what direction the object is heading, given the info that it is taken at sunset off the West coast. Don't ask them what it is -- ask them what direction it is headed, as that is the question they are most qualified to answer.

You can throw every kind of east-bound airplane into the discussion, and it's like tossing in an ice cube into a boiling pot -- it creates the illusion of substance but ultimately, it's nothing but a whisp of steam. The fact is this: the object in the video was heading north west, more exactly, west north-west. The angle of the sunlight illuminating the moving object says so.

The aerospace and military folks who have reassured you that this was an airliner. I am no idea, but perhaps you can tell me: have ANY of them also said that the object was headed east?

Can anyone on this thread link to a sourced written quote or a video interview where one of them actually states that the object in the video was headed East? I know you can produce quotes and video where they say it wasn't a missile and that it was "probably" an airplane. Where are those pros, those guys with their reputations on the line, willing to go out on a limb and state unequivocally that the object in the video was headed east?

People who recognize that very material, physical essential of the story told by a setting sun and the shadows it puts on an object heading toward it, understand that what we're seeing here is an agressive and sophisticated effort to convince good and understandably gullible Americans of a lie.

For those of us who unhappily see that: WE would be just as gullible if the discussion was of something with which WE had only theoretical or armchair knowledge and zero real experience. For me, that could be a tornado or a harsh winter, neither of which I know a darned thing except what I've read in books or seen in films.

It should scare you and wake you up. Instead, you side with people who resort to personal attacks, i.e. calling people like me "conspiracy kooks!"

That, too, should tell you something. The cameraman filmed it because HE knew it wasn't an airliner, and because HE knew it was headed north-west (you can hear for yourself: he says it was headed "west" in a video interview that has been linked on this thread). For the past 11 years, that cameraman has made his living in probably one of the most competetive markets in the world. He didn't get there by being stupider than armchair theorists who've never seen a missile launch.

1,390 posted on 11/18/2010 11:41:02 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

What would be helpful is if the missile theorists did half the work in trying to plot the trajectory, flight path and location of their missile as those who have done so confirming the airplane contrail theory.


1,391 posted on 11/18/2010 11:49:04 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1389 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Where is ionized gas cloud?

None of you missile boys have answered that.

Actually, you guys haven’t answered a whole lot of logical questions, you just deflect and scream “missile!”


1,392 posted on 11/18/2010 12:35:41 PM PST by Sto Zvirat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1376 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
I can't make out the numbers but that is the Sky2 KCBS LA chopper. There is some confusion that it is the same chopper that made a hard landing Friday Nov. 12th. It wasn't. That was Sky9 KCAL's chopper. KCAL is the local CBS news station a sister station to KCBS I guess.

I salute our chopper pilots

You can see the numbers in your pic well enough to see that they aren't the same as this Sky9 chopper. It's confusing though because the URL tag on that pic says "sky-2." When it comes to CBS I'm not sure it's possible to pin anything down for sure.

1,393 posted on 11/18/2010 12:40:31 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies]

To: Sto Zvirat
Here, I found a pic of you and your ionized gas.

Since you've never bothered to post an example of what you're talking about.

1,394 posted on 11/18/2010 12:43:55 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Might as well get this out: All this questioning of hard-working folks' motives, and accusations of fakery are getting mighty da*n tiresome... Most of us are just FReepers, not professionals at this stuff, (who is?) and are just doing the best we can to make sense of this thing...

Amen to that! What we need is the full un-edited video in the highest quality format that can be uploaded to the internet. Let the American people see and play with that. Also, the coordinates and altitude of the Sky2 chopper and time stamps on the video. A compass heading for the direction the camera was pointed too.

That might or might not advance or retard any theories or add anything at all but I'll bet the odds are high that it would.

1,395 posted on 11/18/2010 12:54:16 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1389 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; lbahneman
"What we need is the full un-edited video in the highest quality format that can be uploaded to the internet."

Absolutely!!

I just started sharing my analysis of the CBS video-editing with selected co-workers.

My guess is that when I'm done and share it here, quite a few of my fellow FReepers will be mightily PO'ed!

~~~~~~~~

lb -- FReepMail for you!

1,396 posted on 11/18/2010 1:54:09 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1395 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
"If they won’t release them, why not?"

FReepMail for you -- showing "why not"...

1,397 posted on 11/18/2010 2:38:52 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1387 | View Replies]

To: All
Actually, the exact words of cameraman Gil Leyvas in this CBS 2 TV Los Angeles news broadcast of Nov. 9, regarding the object Leyvas filmed on Nov. 8:

"It was unique, it was moving, it was growing in the sky. As I zoomed in I used a two-times extender on the lens to get a closer look, and you could tell that the object, whatever it was, was spriraling up in the sky. You could see the clouds were kind of swirling and as I zoomed in and got tighter on it, it appeared that it was spinning and going in a westerly direction.

"Well, I realized that it was something that we saw earlier from the week before -- we saw something very similar the past Thursday, and immediately I realized that it was something very similar, and called on the 2-way there to our assignment desk to let them know that we were seeing it again. It's not as dramatic as the one from yesterday -- the one from yesterday was pretty spectacular. Like I said, it was growing in nature and continued to fly up into the sky, and at one point it seemed to separate. The smoke or the plume seemed to stop and then continue further up in the sky and then finally disappear."

1,398 posted on 11/18/2010 4:31:58 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1390 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Its been posted here many times, the glowing gas trail from the rocket as it enters the ionosphere. As for your lame attempt at an insult, I guess, since you have no data, and no way to prove your conspiracy, you have resorted to this. Which, of course means you lost.

BTW, if you have ever seen a launch at sunset, that is what the sky looks like afterward......

1,399 posted on 11/18/2010 4:50:18 PM PST by Sto Zvirat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1394 | View Replies]

To: Sto Zvirat
My conspiracy? What conspiracy? Lost? Lost what?

Sounds to me like you've lost your grip, pal

1,400 posted on 11/18/2010 5:47:39 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1399 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 1,461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson