Posted on 11/13/2010 1:42:55 PM PST by FARS
The video below suggests the mystery missile launch was the USA showing Asia/China and Russia our ability to launch Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM) from a submarine while OBAMBI is in Asia!
Since when has there been ANY doubt we have the capability to do this? That the USA has submarine launch ability to hit China or to hit Russia!
The first, a Pacific launch was 35 miles off Southern California and headed on a North-East - across America trajectory.
The second, shortly after that, was a first ever Atlantic launch and reportedly went up above New York.
(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...
Guess I should ping a giy I’m talking about...
I think, the interest in this thread highlites the degree of distrust in our government that exists in this forum.
Pretty much ALL of us think, it COULD be a missile, and Obama would flat out lie about it. That’s pretty sad... but, true.
Thanks for the ping!
Then I don’t know what you are talking about...
Your overlay photo and the lack of a good velocity reference, along with checking the UPS902/AWE808 flight pretty much killed any missile ideas I may have had, and I was on the missile side at first. The video just does not give you any idea how fast it was moving. Anyone that has seen a launch knows that would be crucial to discerning what it was.
Until I see a wide angle shot from a stable video cam to give an idea of speed, it is most certainly an aircraft that got lit up just right.
Thanks FARS. Could have been an intercept test for SDI. Or, a sub-launched ICBM.
Coming from a "Morgellons" forum, that actually adds to his credibility! He is actually helping their cause in this case, as morgellons is said to be spread by "chemtrails" emitted by NWO jets!
We took out the sub that did it? Musta been a nice fireworks show for the passengers on that ship with nothing else to do, since they had to above deck to escape the stench...........
Has anyone sought out a schedule of any aircraft that left at that time?
Do we know who took the pix of ‘this incident’ that’s being circulated?
I haven’t kept up w/this is the reason I’m asking.
Richard Warren took a series of shots of the contrail from a Long Beach high-rise.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2626757/posts?page=148#148
Thank you. I just viewed it and you did a good job of putting them together.
Did he say why he felt inclined to take those pixs if it happens all the time?
I was just reading the link at post #26. Did you happen to read it? Even the ‘date’ of the article caught my attention - Nov 10th.
I have.
At first glance it DOES look like it might very well be a missile.
However -- on further observation and analysis -- I'm LEANING toward it being a jet plane, of some sort.
Does 'LEANING' toward it being a jet plane mean I am 100% sure?
NO!
I could be wrong.
My opinion is subject to change...
I'm just not willing to accept the alternative -- at this time.
STE=Q
I wish I could take credit for it,
it’s the type of investigative work that appeals to me
but in this case I’m just passing on other’s work...
http://blog.bahneman.com/content/it-was-us-airways-flight-808
I haven’t yet heard what motivated the photo taker.
Nov 10, 2007
I don’t see anything tying it to this event.
:)
That's not at all what I saw. I saw them trying to get him to say it was a missile, and him acknowledging that it looked like one, but not saying that's what it was.
Wasn’t it Nov 9 when this recent event occurred? Or am I mistaken?
Nov.8
Hit "Start Replay," and a little after 17:27, UPS902 appears on the map west of Catalina Island. It does a little jig west of the island, disappears from the screen for a few Area-51 moments at 17:31, comes back a few seconds before 17:32 as it passes over the navigational point/island at 29000 feet, and then continues to follows the path that we saw.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.