Posted on 11/13/2010 1:42:55 PM PST by FARS
The video below suggests the mystery missile launch was the USA showing Asia/China and Russia our ability to launch Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM) from a submarine while OBAMBI is in Asia!
Since when has there been ANY doubt we have the capability to do this? That the USA has submarine launch ability to hit China or to hit Russia!
The first, a Pacific launch was 35 miles off Southern California and headed on a North-East - across America trajectory.
The second, shortly after that, was a first ever Atlantic launch and reportedly went up above New York.
(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...
I said early on, the next day or so, that the ‘true believers’ will only see more evidence that they are wrong as more support for their cause. Sure enough, here we go.
I don’t know what the thing was but since Monday, there have been scores of military aircraft transiting back and forth in the general area of the so called “launch” - I have been in Santa Barbara and Oxnard all last week.
That’s the so-called ‘van down by the river’ effect. Ever notice when it’s not there? Nope. When you’re looking for something, wow that seems to be happening a lot.
That’s a huge military area, tons of planes and ships all the time.
Because I think it fairly clear what the Obama-brigade is on about at the moment - we've seen it before but never quite this desperate. I don't like Obots. In fact, I think they ought to keel over and die, in as much excruciating pain as possible, and then rot into a puddle of green goo.
Would you *please* go take a flying leap at your fireplace?
So if you call this identified commercial flight a plane, you’re an obot now?
Thanks. Chalk it up to my old, tired eyes. :-)
Prolly the very same people who bombed the world trade center and the pentagon !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, at least away from sharp objects and string.
LOL!
Let me see if I've got this right - when the sun is setting and the sun's rays are parallel to the earth's surface, an object also parallel to the earth's surface and also to the sun's rays will cast a shadow, but a vertical object, perpendicular to the sun's rays, will not cast a shadow?
Next time you're out at sunrise or sunset on a clear day, take a look at a handy vertical object (tree, telephone pole, etc) and see if it casts a shadow.
In my world, that's pretty-much a universal occurrence.
Despite your ardent comments this whole thing is still a draw and no clear winner has appeared in this discussion as I tend to find other experts like the General just as valid as your possibly pseudo-science.
Specially when photos of an ADMITTED missile launch in that area tend to be a close match to the one being denied.
Hard to say “this photo IS a launch” and “this photo is NOT a launch” when its hard to see a difference.
Speed still to be explained.
Relax, this is a discussion - sharing of opinions - not bowing to yours - or mine.
Specially as nobody is trying to grind their personal axe rather than have an interesting Saturday afternoon chat.
cheers
To me this is worse than the moon hoaxers. It’s an insult to the intelligence to think that this was anything but a plane. It has been absolutely proven to be a commercial airline and we even know exactly which one it was.
You’re basically giving the same argument that flat earthers give. ‘We don’t know for sure’.
Yes we do.
Don't some missiles travel subsonically?
For instance, if I'm not mistaken, I believe tomahawk cruise missiles travel at about the same speed as a jet.
I'm not saying it was a tomahawk or anything, I'm simply observing that not all missiles are supersonic, and some do travel at jet-like speeds...
Is that STILL all you've got to refute what's presented there?
Me, I look at the collected information and ask questions like "Does it make sense?" "Is it logical?" "Is it reasonable?" "Do the pieces fit together?"
Not - "who is 'Unicorn?'"
Your investigative efforts leave a lot to be desired...
ContrailScience.com is just a place where I write about contrails and science – which also includes some looking at the “chemtrails” theory, and pseudoscience.My name is Mick West, I’m a private pilot (well, nearly), and I’ve been training out of Santa Monica airport, so I know the airspace round here. I like writing, and figuring things out. See something odd in the sky? Let me know.
Email me at:
uncinus@gmail.com
I also post on YouTube as “Epoxynous”
Most of those aren’t contrails...they are chemtrails...weather doesn’t effect chemtrails in the least.
Thank you - you have managed to possibly plug (explain) the only real hole in this debate, the speed factor for which there are not two possibilities. Except some missiles not reaching higher, super speeds until much higher altitudes.
Good discussion folks, thanks.
I have been accused of being a birther and now a flat-earther.
Waiting to see what documentation the retired CIA agents currently combing the world to find any documentation on Obambi’s past will acquire and offer a 25th Amendment Section 4 panel. Or to law enforcement and Federal Marshals.
Might be fun to watch if the Lame Duck session of Congress does not manage to implement an irreparable scorched earth result that reduces our fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
