Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mystery Missiles - Why Are We Stuck on Stupid?
AntiMullah ^ | 11/13/10 | Alan Peters

Posted on 11/13/2010 1:42:55 PM PST by FARS

The video below suggests the mystery missile launch was the USA showing Asia/China and Russia our ability to launch Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM) from a submarine while OBAMBI is in Asia!

Since when has there been ANY doubt we have the capability to do this? That the USA has submarine launch ability to hit China or to hit Russia!

The first, a Pacific launch was 35 miles off Southern California and headed on a North-East - across America trajectory.

The second, shortly after that, was a first ever Atlantic launch and reportedly went up above New York.

(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: californiamissile; china; contrail; emp; missile; mysterymissle; obama; security
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-315 next last
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Has this helicopter been identified


121 posted on 11/13/2010 3:33:29 PM PST by kanawa (Obama - "The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

i see your point .
the missle had been placed there by someone/somehow w/o DOD scrutiny or else it is an american missle but
launched remotely. you don’t need something nearby like a submarine or even a ship to launch .

but here’s my pet theory:The Bam-mobile is outfitted with all sorts or jingle jangles and state of the art launch code this and launch that,so the man-child got bored in the mobile waiting for Michelle to finish up shopping in India and when she finally got back to the car one of her fully laden shopping bags hit the hubs hand where he was messing around with the buttons on the fully designated launch panel controller and there you have it.

It was ‘chelle’s shopping bag at fault.

How did i come up with this? I don’t know I’ll have to ask the family cat.


122 posted on 11/13/2010 3:34:00 PM PST by Mrs.ThurstonHowell (Amendment 25 Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade; bigbob
And what’s the deal on that helo in some of the video - looks like a dual-rotor helo to me, and that’s not what the TV news crews fly.

Looks like a high wing aircraft to me, probably a Cessna 210 or other RG model since no fixed landing gear are visible.

123 posted on 11/13/2010 3:34:28 PM PST by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
I don't know what the heck it was, but I do know that I played golf twice this week and my Sky Caddy couldn't acquire and hold satellites for longer than a few seconds.

The yardage is usually within 3 yards was off by 75-100 yards.

I've used a Sky Caddy for 5 years and this is my second model and never, on two crystal clear, cloudless days, has this ever happened before.

My thoughts are that the satellites that are normally tweeting over PA are re-tasked and eyeballing other faces and places.

I dunno, maybe I need that tin-foil hat.

124 posted on 11/13/2010 3:35:52 PM PST by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
"A vertical missle contrail would not leave a shadow."

Stand up and face the sun. At the same time have someone look behind you. What do you think will be there.

125 posted on 11/13/2010 3:38:13 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dan Cooper

I have blown it up quite a bit more than posted on FR. It is a helo, and it’s even more obvious in the live video. There is a bit of difference in how a helo moves compared to a fixedwing, you know.


126 posted on 11/13/2010 3:39:32 PM PST by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Let’s assume for a moment that the “missileers” are correct...that would indicate the the U.S. military and Federal government (FAA) are lying to us and are corrupted to the core (New World Order, Illuminati, whoever). What then? Open armed rebellion by honest citizens? What is the “End Game”? The Feds (& Fed Reserve) have some major problems, but are not yet at the point that every Air Force “Blue Suiter” at NORAD is “in on it”. So then it becomes a matter of hundreds of Air Force & FAA experts/scientists against the several “experts” the “missileers” here at FR have mentioned.


127 posted on 11/13/2010 3:39:37 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Mid-Ocean on the opposite coast of the country.


128 posted on 11/13/2010 3:39:49 PM PST by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dan Cooper

Thanks, Dan.

I thought I saw just one flame (reflection), shouldn’t it be more than one, up to four, depending on the jet?


129 posted on 11/13/2010 3:40:23 PM PST by melancholy (It ain't Camelot, it's Scam-a-lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I saw it on an old thread and wanted someone to help me with what it meant and you were the lucky guy. Thanks : )


130 posted on 11/13/2010 3:41:03 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Drago

How can people see multiple contrails like this that are IDENTICAL to the ‘missile’ and not make the connection?

Functional retardation? I’d love to see the Janes guy see the tons of pics of planes that are virtually identical and come up with an excuse.


131 posted on 11/13/2010 3:42:00 PM PST by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FARS
Mid-Ocean on the opposite coast of the country.

That nobody saw. So tell me this, if the missile went over the entire country and landed a thousand miles into the Atlantic then why the need to launch from 40 miles off the west coast? In your scenario they could have launched from a thousand miles off California and hit every city in the U.S.

132 posted on 11/13/2010 3:42:07 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Drago; All

People please, this was a contrail that people in a narrow corridor believed was a missile launch. No one else, up or down the coast saw a “missile launch.” This is as bad as so called “chemical trails.” Crew member on B-52s and working for the new United for 26+ years.

United Parcel Service Flight #902.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/#more-4


133 posted on 11/13/2010 3:44:03 PM PST by surchris (Once communist born, now a Liberal irritant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye
Remember, whatever goes up must come down. If these were missiles, where did they come down?

Almost anywhere in the Pacific. The French "routinely" launch ballistic missile from the Bay of Biscay into the Atlantic south of New Foundland and U.S. radar routinely track them. A launch from that location would almost certainly have been seen from PAVE PAWS Beale, that's more or less why it exists. If they had detected an unexpected ballistic missile launch from that location, the U.S. would have gone to DEFCON 2, if not DEFCON 1.

134 posted on 11/13/2010 3:44:22 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Go Packers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

LOL - I think you figured it out.


135 posted on 11/13/2010 3:45:19 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

That’s a high wing aircraft, not a helicopter. Probably a Cessna with retractable gear like a 210.


136 posted on 11/13/2010 3:45:27 PM PST by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Interesting


137 posted on 11/13/2010 3:46:04 PM PST by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye

>>
Remember, whatever goes up must come down. If these were missiles, where did they come down?
<<

What he said. If it was a missile, where did it come down?


138 posted on 11/13/2010 3:46:28 PM PST by noblejones (Obama rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

So, missiles fly really, really slow such that the video took 10 minutes? In 10 minutes a missile half way across the Pacific Ocean, not just going up. You people need to get an education in 3-dimentional viewing and stop this “look at me!” attention whore stuff.

It wasn’t a missile any more than it was Santa Clause.


139 posted on 11/13/2010 3:46:54 PM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

A real SLBM is far out of the atmosphere and a smeared blob in 3 minutes or so.

To think that this was some sort of rocket is lunacy. To the point that they might need to be locked up.


140 posted on 11/13/2010 3:48:39 PM PST by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson