Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAW VIDEO: Mysterious Contrail Off Calif. (screen shots too)
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2010/11/09/exclusive-raw-video-mysterious-missile-launch-off-california-coast/ ^

Posted on 11/10/2010 12:53:48 AM PST by roses of sharon

Video posted on the CBS Los Angeles website shows an object flying through the evening sky Monday that left a large contrail, or vapor trail. While cruising the skies Monday at sunset, Sky2 captured on video what appears to be a missile making its way up into the sky from over the Pacific Ocean off the California coast.

Pentagon officials were stumped by the event. “Nobody within the Department of Defense that we’ve reached out to has been able to explain what this contrail is, where it came from,” Pentagon spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said.

Pentagon Says No Missile Behind Contrail: KNX 1070′s Charles Feldman Reports

While the vapor cloud captured on video resembled that created by a rocket in flight, military officials said they didn’t know of any launches in the area.

Lapan said that “all indications” were that the Defense Department was not involved with the object.

One expert called it an optical illusion. “It’s an airplane that is heading toward the camera and the contrail is illuminated by the setting sun,” said John Pike, director of the U.S.-based security analyst group globalsecurity.org.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, issued a statement jointly with the U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, saying that the contrail was not the result of a foreign military launching a missile. It provided no details.

“We can confirm that there is no threat to our nation,” the statement said. “We will provide more information as it becomes available.”

NORTHCOM is the U.S. defense command and NORAD is a U.S.-Canadian organization charged with protecting the U.S. from the threat of missiles or hostile aircraft.

Pike said the object could not have been a rocket because it appeared to alter its course.

“The local station chopped up the video and so it’s hard to watch it continuously,” Pike said. “But at one place you can see it has changed course — rockets don’t do that.”

Pike said he didn’t understand why the military had not recognized the contrail of an aircraft. “The Air Force must …understand how contrails are formed,” he said. “Why they can’t get some major out to belabor the obvious, I don’t know.”

Judge for yourself by watching this raw video from Sky2.

Or have a closer look at some of the screen shots we’ve taken.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: californiamissile; contrail; mysterymissile; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: TigersEye

In the nose of the rocket is a little thing called a “guidance system” It can change course anytime. This whole thing is stinky cheese. The reason NorthCom can tell us with certainty that there is no threat to the US is because they know exactly what happened. They just are not telling us.


41 posted on 11/10/2010 5:36:32 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
It’s a common contrail. The object is traveling toward you, not away from you, and since the contrail has a long persistence, it looks like it emanates from the horizon, thus the illusion that it is a missile traveling away from you.

Seems pretty clear to me.
42 posted on 11/10/2010 5:41:30 AM PST by Banjoguy (Barack H. Obama, the Democrats and the MSM are at war with the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netz

You do not launch West for orbital payloads in the US.


43 posted on 11/10/2010 5:49:55 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (What flavor kool-aid are you drinking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
The "missile" was launched from Honolulu International Airport.

Good one, but after decades of flights, we crazy Kalifornians are just now starting to notice these Honolulu missiles. Guess we should have been looking up from our bongs more often, dude !

44 posted on 11/10/2010 5:54:59 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I’ve learned more about missle launches in 15 minutes reading this thread than I knew about this subject in my entire life.

FR is the cat’s meow.


45 posted on 11/10/2010 6:05:31 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Why couldn’t that be the contrail of the US Air flight? The Setting Sun illuminates it. You would think that this is a common phenomenon..

I live under a flight path close to Lake Michigan...I see contrails over my house all day long...Have never seen one that looks like that...

The color is typical of a contrail at sunset but the erratic path and amount of contrail resembles something more like one would see coming out of Cape Canaveral...

46 posted on 11/10/2010 6:41:16 AM PST by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

BUMP


47 posted on 11/10/2010 6:41:56 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Just talking to myself here. I have seen a number of missile launches, Nike-Herc and HAWKS on Okinawa. These things go up right smartly. IIRC the top speed of the Nike was somewhere around 3000 mph. No idea what the rate of acceleration was.
Near the “bottom” end of the “contrail” the wind distortion of it is quite obvious, but becomes less so with the “increase of altitude.” But still, with the rate of acceleration of the “missile” the “contrail” just does not look right.
In pic 10, there is a darker line more or less intersecting with the “missile”. This does not appear to be a cloud because of the wind direction. No idea what it might be. Just observing. Done talking with myself now. Have a great day.


48 posted on 11/10/2010 7:48:34 AM PST by Rannug (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-qH02g4DLI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
TWA 800 was shot down by terrorists. The forensic evidence is viewed from the reconstructed fuselage. Over five hundred eye witness say the contrail of the missle fise from the ocean and head towards TWA 800. A women celebrating her birthday on the beach was photographed on the Lng Island each and the missile contrail is streaking upward above her head.

I wonder why the autopsy reports of the passengers were classified. Was the fregments indicative of a war head!

After the crash records of of other man launched anti aircarft systems were disclosed.

Why the coverup?

49 posted on 11/10/2010 7:48:48 AM PST by Young Werther ("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Look at the conehead of the trail, it is not an aircraft and if it was routine, why did so many folks report it as “unusual”. It was perhaps a test towards Kwajalin Island? Not sure.


50 posted on 11/10/2010 8:01:48 AM PST by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

Would NORAD and the other myriad agencies be so stupified? Come on. This was a US launch.


51 posted on 11/10/2010 8:03:46 AM PST by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

OK, maybe not orbital but how about sub-orbital, is that a possibility? How about a target missile for another system being tested? How about decoys? The possibilities are not so small.


52 posted on 11/10/2010 8:06:30 AM PST by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Netz

Judging from the shots I saw, that’s the exhaust plume of a solid propellant rocket motor. The point of origin is either at sea level or from a subsurface launch. The trajectory is definitely that of a missile. The flight profile looks like either a cruise missle or SAM and not a ballistic missile.

The question is what do the FAA radar tapes reveal origin, course, and speed?

Then, who’s the responsible party?


53 posted on 11/10/2010 8:38:45 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Netz
The possibilities are endless. The fact that Goobermint is trying to pass this off as an airliner going West to East is just the stupidest one.
54 posted on 11/10/2010 8:57:43 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (What flavor kool-aid are you drinking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
The reason NorthCom can tell us with certainty that there is no threat to the US is because they know exactly what happened. They just are not telling us.

That and the fact that the gov has no problem lying to the public. This is the kind of thing they have kept secret all along. Even if it came from a hostile as a warning they could say honestly that there is no threat. The caveat is that there is no immediate threat as it was obviously a warning (saber rattling).

But your hunch is the most likely scenario. It was ours and for some reason they don't want to own up to it.

55 posted on 11/10/2010 12:13:41 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
Thanks for the link and the ideas. I am not that worried about our mil knowing what it was and responding appropriately ... now that it has happened. Even if a foreign nation launched it it might be a good sign in regards to our reaction.

It was launched in international waters and took a course away from the CONUS. Assuming we have a defense against it and assuming it was spotted immediately then it follows that we assessed it as a non-threat and did nothing instead of revealing our capabilities.

I lean toward the speculation that it was ours but if it was, for instance, China's and they were probing our responses they learned little for certain. They might know from radio chatter whether we were on it or asleep at the wheel but it may be very difficult for them to ascertain why we didn't fire at it.

They can only guess that we have no capability to, are too slow on the trigger, have no will to respond, have constipation in the command structure or, as I laid out above, we had it dead in our sights and correctly called it no threat within seconds. I'd love to believe that last one but...

56 posted on 11/10/2010 12:35:38 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rannug
In pic 10, there is a darker line more or less intersecting with the “missile”.

Thanks for pointing that darker line out. Major tinfoil alert. Been seeing these darker lines here in Kalifornia. Have seen them twice now in the past three years. Call them dark rays. First time I saw one was up around Sacramento. Was driving from Napa to the 5 Freeway. Was in the major wetlands area there and saw my first dark ray out to the northeast over Sacramento. Took a picture of that one but it had faded by the time I got the camera out. Can barely see it. Then about a year later saw some down here in San Bernardino County. There were multiple parallel dark rays and I got a good shot of them from the car. Will dig up images and see if I can make them public somehow. Possible the dark rays could just be shadow rays, but they look like something a bit more exotic. Originally thought they were connected to some stupid government Global Cooling project (to prevent warming), but that image you pointed out brings up more possibilities.

And now the Tinfoil part. There is a Jewish Mysticism group that talks about dark rays from the moon. Found this page via a google search a year ago. The Dark Rays of the Moon: Yom Kippur Katan as Preparation for Rosh Chodesh

57 posted on 11/10/2010 4:14:53 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
See image 10 that Rannug pointed out. Thanks Rannug, I had not spent time viewing those images. Possible the missile was hit by the Dark Ray after launch. Made inert somehow and was set off course. And here I thought the Dark Rays I have a captured on a camera were for some stupid Global Cooling project. The Boys with the Secret Toys apparently are not stupid enough to fall for that Al Gore snake oil. At least that is good to know.
58 posted on 11/10/2010 4:23:25 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape; Rannug
There is a more reasonable and common explanation for that dark line.

Moon shadow.

59 posted on 11/10/2010 5:11:57 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
That's no contrail, the engine's on fire.

FIRE. FIRE!

60 posted on 11/10/2010 5:27:11 PM PST by McGruff (A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson