Hard Data Supporting Fraudulent Activity in Nevada Election - ACTION NEEDED

<self> | 11/3/2010 | lexinom and Black_Shark

[Lexinom]

I put some effort into compiling this data and hope it may help prove, with hard data, that the Nevada "election" was not a one-legal-citizen, one-vote affair. I believe the Angle campaign has a case based on a comparison of the accuracy of polling of other races with that of their own, where the result was well outside the MOE of an aggregate of polls. Off one pull fine. Off seven by a wide margin, not kosher.

The first data points (EXHIBIT A) are from a sampling of races and the poll aggregates leading up to election day.

The second set of data points (EXHIBIT B) represent the polling for the Nevada race and shows a great deviation not only outside of the consistently polled trends but well beyond the margin of error of multiple, agreeing polls. I think the Angle campaign may have a case, and it's critical, if nothing else, that they use this golden opportunity before them to begin cleaning up the corruption that hampers the democratic process and disenfranchises thousands of legal citizens. PLEASE... Move forward with this!

EXHIBIT A - ACCURATE POLLING IN RACES FROM 2 NOVEMBER 2010(*)

Toomey/Sestak 
RCP Average             10/24 - 10/31	--	   49.5	45.0	Toomey +4.5
PPP (D)                 10/30 - 10/31	772 LV	51	46	Toomey +5
Morning Call Tracking   10/28 - 10/31	474 LV	48	44	Toomey +4
Quinnipiac              10/25 - 10/30	1244 LV     50	45	Toomey +5
Rasmussen Reports       10/28 - 10/28	750 LV	50	46	Toomey +4
McClatchy/Marist        10/26 - 10/28	461 LV	52	45	Toomey +7
Susquehanna             10/24 - 10/27	800 LV	46	44	Toomey +2

Toomey won by 2%.
( source )

Boxer/Fiorina race 
RCP Average		10/26 - 10/31	--	48.3	43.3	Boxer +5.0
PPP (D)			10/29 - 10/31	882 LV	50	46	Boxer +4
SurveyUSA		10/26 - 10/31	587 LV	46	38	Boxer +8
Rasmussen Reports	10/27 - 10/27	750 LV	49	46	Boxer +3

"The AP called the race as Boxer took a lead of 48 percent to 46 percent, with 15 percent of precincts reporting."
( source )

Rubio/Crist/Meek 
RCP Average		10/25 - 10/31	--	47.0	30.0	19.2	Rubio +17.0
PPP (D)			10/30 - 10/31	773 LV	47	30	21	Rubio +17
Sunshine State News/VSS	10/29 - 10/31	1527 LV	48	31	20	Rubio +17
Quinnipiac		10/25 - 10/31	925 LV	45	31	18	Rubio +14
Rasmussen Reports	10/27 - 10/27	750 LV	50	30	16	Rubio +20
Mason-Dixon		10/25 - 10/27	625 LV	45	28	21	Rubio +17

Rubio won by 19%.

Marco Rubio	REP	2,604,892 (49.00%)	
Kendrick B. Meek	DEM	1,070,242 (20.13%)

( source )

Kirk/Giannoulias 
RCP Average			10/18 - 10/31	--	44.8	41.5	Kirk +3.3
PPP (D)				10/30 - 10/31	814 LV	46	42	Kirk +4
FOX News/POR-Rasmussen		10/30 - 10/30	1000 LV	46	42	Kirk +4
Chicago Tribune			10/18 - 10/22	700 LV	44	41	Kirk +3
Post-Dispatch/Mason-Dixon	10/18 - 10/20	625 LV	43	41	Kirk +2

Kirk won by 2%.

Kirk (R)	1,749,941	48.4%	 
Giannoulias (D)	1,667,527	46.1%

( source)

Blumenthal/ McMahon
RCP Average		10/24 - 10/31 — 53.0 44.3 Blumenthal +8.7
Rasmussen Reports		10/31 - 10/31 750 LV 53 46 Blumenthal +7
Quinnipiac			10/25 - 10/31 930 LV 53 44 Blumenthal +9
PPP (D) 			10/27 - 10/29 759 LV 54 43 Blumenthal +11
CT Capitol Report/MRG 		10/24 - 10/26 1846 LV 52 44 Blumenthal +8

Blumenthal by 8%

Johnson/Feingold
RCP Average 			10/25 - 10/28 — 52.7 45.0 Johnson +7.7
McClatchy/Marist 		10/26 - 10/28 491 LV 52 45 Johnson +7
PPP (D) 			10/26 - 10/28 1372 LV 53 44 Johnson +9
Rasmussen Reports 		10/25 - 10/25 750 LV 53 46 Johnson +7

Johnson by 5%

Coons/O’Donnell
RCP Average 			10/14 - 10/27 — 53.0 39.0 Coons +14.0
Monmouth University 		10/25 - 10/27 1171 LV 51 41 Coons +10
Fairleigh Dickinson 		10/20 - 10/26 797 LV 57 36 Coons +21
Rasmussen Reports 		10/14 - 10/14 500 LV 51 40 Coons +11

Coons by 16%

Burr/Marshall
RCP Average 		10/12 - 10/31 — 50.3 37.5 Burr +12.8
PPP (D) 		10/29 - 10/31 847 LV 52 40 Burr +12
SurveyUSA 		10/22 - 10/25 590 LV 53 38 Burr +15
Civitas (R) 		10/18 - 10/20 600 LV 44 34 Burr +10
Rasmussen Reports	10/12 - 10/12 500 LV 52 38 Burr +14

Burr by 12%

These demonstrate the veracity of the polling mechanisms. All margin of victories closely matched the leadup polling.

EXHIBIT B: POLLING AND RESULT OF NEVADA SENATE RACE, 2 NOVEMBER 2010(*)

RCP Average             10/25 - 10/31     48.0 45.3 Angle +2.7
---------------------------------------------------------------
PPP (D)                 10/30 - 10/31 682 LV  47 46 Angle +1
FOX News/POR-Rasmussen  10/30 - 10/30 1000 LV 48 45 Angle +3
LVRJ/Mason-Dixon        10/25 - 10/27 625 LV  49 45 Angle +4
Rasmussen Reports       10/25 - 10/25 750 LV  49 45 Angle +4
CNN/Time                10/20 - 10/26 773 LV  49 45 Angle +4
Rasmussen Reports       10/17 - 10/17 750 LV  50 47 Angle +3
LVRJ/Mason-Dixon        10/11 - 10/12 625 LV  48 46 Angle +2
Rasmussen Reports       10/11 - 10/11 750 LV  49 48 Angle +1<

Result: Angle -5 ( source )

Counted Ballots         11/2                  45 50 Angle -5

7 polls by professional and reputable pollsters are off by an average of 7.7% And we are to lend credibility to this result? Not one poll, not two. SEVEN, each with a typically small MOE.

It's in Sharron's hands at this moment, but from what I've seen in the past - Rossi/Gregoire (2004) was enough. I say Franken/Coleman (2008) - was enough to convince me of enough.

It's time for accountability and action.

*All polls in this and previous posts by lexinom and Black_Shark are from Real Clear Politics. All credit is to be given to them and their team for compiling this data. We are just copying it here for evidence.

[Lexinom]

This is incredibly damning evidence pointing to fraud. Our metrics are polling data leading up to races relative to their outcomes.

It should be readily apparent that Angle's race outcome not only did not match multiple polls in general agreement leading up to the election, but deviated by several times the margin of error!

Questions to answer: * Who are the right people to run with this? * Who holds those responsible for this accountable? * How is that done?

This is our chance to do something more than simply complain about unfair elections. We have hard data backing us up. Action must be taken. Harmed parties need to see this grotesque discrepancy between Sharron Angle's race and several other presumably unmolested races.

Ideas? Comments? Analysis? Time is of the essence!

[Lexinom]

Thanks for your help! Here we are. Let’s hope it gets seen and gets some input.

[paulycy]

I’d start by contacting fox news. They must have an email address on the screen right now.

[BossLady]

Nevada Election Fraud???? Interesting compilation of numbers here...

[skr]

She’s conceded, hasn’t she? I wish they’d just wait for all the votes to be counted before they concede. Reid apparently won in Las Vegas’ county which is also on the border of two states. Probably bussed in some spare votes.

[Lexinom]

Whether she has conceded or not is immaterial to the larger point, which is that there's overwhelming evidence that thousands of Nevada voters were disenfranchised. We can't keep screaming about unfair elections and yet do nothing. We've put together some hard data that we believe demonstrates that this race, based on such a wide deviation from multiple, reputable polls, does not jive with the polling/result relationship of other races.

[1035rep]

Maybe this is what they were up to during that sudden power failure.

[The Raven]

It’s called voter fraud. The local SEIU union added votes to the D column and/or subtracted votes to the R column. The DNC injected $1MM into Nevada on Monday and there are some rich folks there now.

[nikos1121]

They are going to say, that it was a matter of them gettin out the vote....

I’m looking at the desparity between the no of votes for governor and the number cast for senate race.

[presently no screen name]

17,000 right?

[SeattleBruce]

“She’s conceded, hasn’t she?”

She did appear and talk to her supporters, but there’s some question as to whether it was a classical concession speech. Did she actually declare dingy harry the winner, or say the words “I concede?” We’re hoping she wakes up tomorrow and is prepared to go to the mat with the RATS over voter fraud, SEIU involvement in the machines, the Harrah’s casino business - all of it.

I can’t see any indication that she conceded on her website:
http://sharronangle.com

She’s been recently discussing indications of voter fraud ‘pouring in’: http://video.foxnews.com/v/4398061/sharron-angle-on-hannity

Fox news labels this video a ‘concession speech’:
http://video.foxnews.com/
She said, “I just talked to Senator Reid and I congratulated him” - I guess that’s a concession. UGH!!

Don’t give up on us now Sharron!

[BossLady]

Some interesting 'Official' yet 'Unofficial' results of Nevada race -

http://silverstate2010.com/USSenateStateWide.aspx

- Statewide - Papa Reid won Senate by 5.65% yet Junior Reid LOSES Governorship by 11.75%.

- Sec. of State, Ross Miller (D) won....and he runs the elections

http://silverstate2010.com/congressional.aspx

- Dina Titus, the Dim Darling gets edged out by Rep. Joe Heck in District 3 in Clark County!

Good breakdown of county results here - (Junior loses Clark County (Vegas) by 2% but Papa wins by 12%...and Junior loses by 20% in Washoe County (Reno) but Papa wins by 5%????? Really?????)

http://www.rgj.com/section/electionresults

[nikos1121]

Yeah, how does that happen? People voting “none of the above”?

Angle is 3% up before the election, exit polling has it even, and she ends up 5% down?

[Chet 99]

The Republican establishment in Reno was supporting Reid.

[SeattleBruce]

This is SO bad - it stinks to HIGH HEAVEN and it makes me hoppin’ mad. I’m spittin’ nails mad and it’s 2:35am right now...

[SeattleBruce]

“This is final.”

Power outage, Harrah’s rubbish, SEIU in charge of ‘maintaining’ the voting machines, RAT Sos - no, it’s not final in my book.

[BossLady]

I live in Reno....some were supporting Reid....others were not.

[prisoner6]

Great work! It sure implies massive fraud. If the RNC can find it's new spine there should be an investigation.

Then again since it's Vegas the evidence trail is probably pretty well covered unless someone in the know comes forward.

[In Maryland]

The analysis on Fox News said that the apparent margin came from early voting - which certainly, if legitimate, points to an even wider disparity with the polls (presumably people who already voted are not swayable in the last days).

Also recall the reports of voting machines pre-programmed for Reid in Nevada early voting.

It should be noted that the margin of victory also apparently came from Las Vegas. Emails have been leaked showing the conspiracy between the casino industry and the SEIU in getting casino workers to vote for Reid. I think this needs to be publicized and conservatives need to boycott Las Vegas. We need to hit them where it hurts.

Also, what other companies are controlled by the big casino corporations in Las Vegas?

And, after we finally get an investigation into Obama's Illinois corruption, I think Dirty Harry and his shady real estate deals need to see the light of day.