Obama: On a scale of 1 to 10, let's go left 8
GOP: NO
Obama: Well I wanted 10, so let's cut a deal and go 9?
GOP: Ok!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Bigtigermike
So after smearing and lying for almost two years, now Barry O wants to play nice. In the words of a certain one-term president: We (will have) won.
2 posted on
11/02/2010 11:03:52 AM PDT by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
To: Bigtigermike
3 posted on
11/02/2010 11:05:03 AM PDT by
FrankR
(November 2nd is NOT an election - it's a RESTRAINING ORDER.....VOTE!)
To: Bigtigermike
The White House wants to use the news conference the next day to help Mr. Obama reframe his presidency and signal that he heard what the voters were trying to tell him.”
Doubtful, if he’d heard correctly the news conference would be to announce his resignation.
4 posted on
11/02/2010 11:05:54 AM PDT by
bereanway
(I'd rather have 40 Marco Rubios than 60 Arlen Specters)
To: Bigtigermike
I’ll be sipping slurpees. Then, I’ll pick up my shovel and throw dirt in the ditch on him and his Deathmoblie.
5 posted on
11/02/2010 11:06:38 AM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Democrats delenda est)
To: Bigtigermike
Bipartisanship? With his “enemies” in the back of the bus? Does this idiot know what “burning your bridges” means?
7 posted on
11/02/2010 11:07:13 AM PDT by
Spok
To: Bigtigermike
Obama: “Look - it’s raining!” (while p*ssing on my shoes).
8 posted on
11/02/2010 11:07:30 AM PDT by
Gabrial
(The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
To: Bigtigermike
Well, Mr “We Won!”, elections are a b**ch, no? Where was bipartisanship for past 18+ months? YOUR party refused to hear any ideas from the GOP and went so far as to lock GOPers out of meetings. Frankly, Mr. Obama, you and your party can eat it.
9 posted on
11/02/2010 11:07:56 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Bigtigermike
Turn about is fair play. Enough of this rolling over, licking boots crap.
Since the R leaders have no nads....GO SARAH!
10 posted on
11/02/2010 11:08:15 AM PDT by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
To: Bigtigermike
All right, first thing you do is get rid of some people in your administration who were all about partisan warfare.
11 posted on
11/02/2010 11:09:13 AM PDT by
bkepley
To: Bigtigermike
Is this the same guy who refused all attempts by the Republicans to come with a bipartisan agreement on health-care, eventually shutting out all talk with the Republicans, instead ramming down the throats of the American people the Democrat socialist plan? Yeah I thought so!
12 posted on
11/02/2010 11:09:39 AM PDT by
rawhide
To: Bigtigermike
13 posted on
11/02/2010 11:09:43 AM PDT by
Soul Seeker
( I was there when we had the numbers, but didnÂ’t have the principles.---Jim that leans conservDeMin)
To: Bigtigermike
Obama can stuff his pleas for bipartisanship . He had over 2 years to change himself and he failed.
If the GOP buys Obama’s bipartisanship line, they do so at their own peril...l and at our country’s peril.
15 posted on
11/02/2010 11:10:21 AM PDT by
Gator113
(Beauty will devour the Beast in 2012. Kill "Obamamosque"@ Ground Zero)
To: Bigtigermike
bipartisanship means “Punish your enemies”
16 posted on
11/02/2010 11:11:02 AM PDT by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: Bigtigermike
17 posted on
11/02/2010 11:11:02 AM PDT by
ColdOne
To: Bigtigermike
Aides said they expected Mr. Obama to call for an end to the division that characterized the campaign and for a renewed focus on bipartisanship to solve the nations economic and other problems. Mr. Obama can ride with us. It just, you know, has to be in the back.
Hey, elections have consequences. Who said that?
18 posted on
11/02/2010 11:12:15 AM PDT by
Tribune7
(The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
To: Bigtigermike
RE: The President Plans a Post-Mortem (Will call for renewed focus on bipartisanship)
If by bi-partisanship, he means, let’s pick and choose the elements of Obamacare we like (meaning, he’ll get something and the GOP gets something ), then the answer is — NO WAY.
KILL THE BEAST and START FROM SCRATCH.
We did not put the GOP there to compromise on this monstrosity.
19 posted on
11/02/2010 11:12:20 AM PDT by
WebFocus
To: Bigtigermike
20 posted on
11/02/2010 11:12:47 AM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(FreeRepublic......Montly Donors Wanted.)
To: Bigtigermike
So then Obama will leave the TelePrompter behind that he used to encourage one group of Americans to "punish"another group of Americans, correct?
Where was bipartisanship with ObamaCare? "I won," remember?
Just like campaign finance reform, what Democrats really want is for Republicans to surrender their advantage.
21 posted on
11/02/2010 11:13:30 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(BHO -- out the door in 4)
To: Bigtigermike
Oh one more thing. Do not believe him.
22 posted on
11/02/2010 11:14:01 AM PDT by
ColdOne
To: Bigtigermike
bipartisan NOW?
uhm bye bambam....
WE WON!
24 posted on
11/02/2010 11:15:27 AM PDT by
eeevil conservative
(GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson