Posted on 10/26/2010 10:10:18 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater
...
Just tell me about this scandal. (Leans back, folds arms across chest. Looks outside – then back to me) Ok then – I’ll point your nose in the right direction. Enough people are sniffing in the same garbage pile anyways, including the Times. Though I suspect they are burying it at the moment, or trying to. They are still heavily invested in Obama, but that may change soon… Go back to Chicago. That is the key. There is other crap around the White House, other things that could trip them up, but Chicago is where the real heavy deal is that could bring the administration down. Go back and review Blagojevich. Go back and review Rezko, Barton, Stern, Giordano, Carothers, Jarret. It’s one and the same. It’s all connected, and it’s big. And people know. The White House is -expletive- itself over this stuff. Pelosi has it. Clintons have it – more of it than they had in 2008.
(Interrupts) What do you mean “have it”? The information – the story. At least some of it, enough of it. It’s all a chess match you know. A series of moves. Right now the White House is scrambling, and they don’t know enemies from friends anymore. The party is attempting to localize the damage so it doesn’t spread. Make it just about Chicago, and worst case, Obama – but not the party. And so you look back to Chicago, you look at the Justice Department, connect the dots. One investigation will potentially reveal the other. And it’s all setting up to happen now if the November elections go down with a Republican landslide. Obama will be left without protection. His inner circle is scared to death. I mean truly frightened by the prospects of ... ... more
(Excerpt) Read more at newsflavor.com ...
Oprah is the Turtle.....more later
Flys and maggots on rotting fish.... ewwww...
A scandal on Obama...wow, these are what dreams are made of..haha. Well, I would want a good person on the right to replace him or else the effort will be squandered. But then again, this could all be BS....we’ll see I suppose.
thanks for the ping.....I wonder if any of this has to do with whatever it was that Glenn Beck mentioned a few days ago would be revealed in 10 days (@Oct 30)
Could this be any more obviously bogus? It reads like a really bad screenplay.
And after all that, one of them got two full terms in the Whitehouse followed by an endless string of $100,000 appearances.
The other is Secretary of State.
If anyone expects justice in this world, especially the part of it in DC, they will be waiting a long long time.
Agreed. I think there is basically zero chance that this is legit.
Democrats, of course, want to keep all of this from ever being talked about because Ulstermann is right: if Americans on a large scale started talking about ANY of this, they’d wonder why the Democrats lied about it all. They’d demand to know why none of this stuff came out in 2008.
The "insider" already stated why...to help individual Democrats, and the party in particular, survive.
There is a lot of interest in this series and I have yet to see a chronological index of installments. Thus, the list of links.
No more, no less.
My belief is that if one reads the interviews in chronological order they will be able to determine by themselves if the events predicted actually occurred. Only so is one be able to judge the legitimacy of the 'source' for themselves.
It could be an amalgamation of all of a lot of sources. Basically the interviewee is a fictional character serving as a focal point of information gathered in bits and pieces from a lot of people by the author.
I don't think just one person would risk releasing this information. A potpourri makes it more difficult to determine an association with a particular person.
JMO.
Once the reality of November 2nd hits obama. ....and it will hit him like a pail of Ice Water, he will crack. The rats will jump ship. Biden will have to take over. Homosex and Cocaine will be in the news.
dayum
This is different. Clinton was a scumbag, a hard-working scumbag. Obama can’t be bothered. That’s why the many high-level defections/desertions from this Administration in the heat of an election year.
Did you know that Blago was considered the front-runner for 2008 in 2005? Do you think Blago will lie down, bend over, and take one for the team?
Specifically, Rezko and friends are also not going to take it. We know about Arkancide. But any one hear of Obamacide? Doesn’t have the clout. And losing a chief of staff at this time? While the only DemonRat willing to let Obama campaign is Coons, and that will make the election close.
Not going to be 50 seats. Going to be 60-105. And many DemonRats elected in 2006 and 2008 are going to have to get day jobs, as the states have no extra money, and the Feds money jar will be in the Republicans’ hands.
Hitler wasn’t so brilliant a campaigner he could win in Tel Aviv. Obama won’t carry Peoria. Fraudulent Selective Service papers will hurt. Documented taking of foreign money will hurt. Big Media and DemonRat power brokers will try to get the res__ent to resign, but the White House staffer are now mostly KoolAid drinkers. And Jim Jones didn’t go down pretty, but a few of his henchmen survived.
Darn! I was about to page quidam to the white courtesy phone....
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wasn’t raving. The newspapers in Canada, Britain, and Japan were all over the tainted prison blood story. But not one newspaper in the U.S., outside the Village Voice, had the integrity to run the story.
Beuty parlor spies? Makes sense. I know many Russians with medical degrees go into beautician work, because in Russia, it pays better. Same work in D.C. obviously pays even better. Throw in spy money, no comparison.
And how will American doctors react when beauticians make more than M.D.s in Brooklyn? Or Indianapolis? Falling down on so many levels. We could sweep in 2010, 2012, and 2014 if Obamacare is not repealed.
Bribery, gay sex and murder? Already known. But let the National Enquirer, People, and 60 Minutes run with it, and the _res__ent may not be able to get a job as Communistity Origami folder.
I agree that the democrats want Romney as an opponent, but I think that is because he is almost a democrat anyway. They believe that if Hillary lost to him, Romney would be nearly as good as Hillary for all their causes. So it would be no great loss to them. (Same situation as we had with Obama/McCain in 2008.)
But I believe if Romney is the choice, there is no way Hillary loses the blacks. Bill Clinton, the first black president, would win them over for her. Romney would be attacked on his church’s former stand on blacks and with the racist statements in the book of Mormon. All of which would energize the blacks to vote. Romney would have to denounce the book of Mormon or abandon all hope of getting any black person to vote for him.
Your scenario would probably work as you stated with Huckabee as the nominee rather than Romney since Huckabee is both hated by conservatives and is known for having a good relationship with blacks.
The point is that there are without a doubt things that could be found and that would do great harm to Barry if not completely ruin him, not only for the rest of his term, but for doing anything after he leaves office. There are also people desperately looking for those things, especially the Clinton crowd who has a long memory and and even longer record of ALWAYS getting revenge. While Barry is concerned about the next two years, he's scared stiff over not being able to turn his tenure in office into a continuous gold mine when he leaves.
The Clintons and many Republicans (they're not all wimps) on the other hand, are trying to find enough to either impeach him or ruin him and not too interested in little stuff. So, if you can get those who are looking focused on the wrong places Barry has a better chance of running out the clock. Once out of office, the Clintons will have other ways to take revenge on those who turned on Hillary and they'll start with those still in power, leaving others in their camp to screw around with Barry.
Republicans taking over the House is a huge worry for Barry as well, since if they have the power to subpoena and to protect those they subpoena, there is a LOT of dirt to be found. The fact that this "source" keeps pointing people back to Chicago is a dead give away that it's a diversion in my opinion, because digging there runs into the strength of the machine that will protect Barry because he is one of their own and they'll go down with him. Also, anything they find there won't be nearly as damaging as what they can find that has gone on between he and his posse of czars since he came to office.
Someone may well step up and rat out a lot of what Barry has done that is not only obviously illegal, but obviously traitorous as well. But in all likelihood, it'll be someone in the Michelle camp of the Chicago crowd who decides on their own or on the orders of others to give Barry up to protect everyone else. Whether or not that happens depends primarily on whether or not the Chicago crowd can both cover their tracks and connections to various of the Barry follies and retain sufficient power to make their troops stay in line.
Regards
I agree that it reads like bad fiction. When I first read the part you excerpted in your post (post #85), I thought it sounded bizarre and had to read it twice. I believe it is composite fiction and rumor and was probably constructed by more than one person.
I believe the actual author(s) are reading internet reactions to it (ours and others whom they want to influence) and adjusting the ‘story’ to work better. I think that’s why he wrote about ‘don’t forget who gave you this information’; it’s his response to posts on the net saying they think Ulsterman is the real author.
Another example - some of us lambasted the ‘source’ as a creep (and I am sure other websites had similar posts) for stating his sole interest in helping Dem pols keep their careers and having zero interest in the welfare of the country. So this time - it’s heavy on the ‘I love my country.’
Do I believe a source who has a 30 year career in the Dem party would actually meet with Ulsterman for 2 hours IN HIS OWN OFFICE? Nah
These ‘leaks’ are intended to con us into doing what? So far, I believe that my fellow FReepers who point to diversion are on the right track.
This ‘source’ makes a point of saying that they want the American people to know that Obama does not represent the Democrat brand. Ah...that’s the real problem isn’t it? Obama is an out and out failure and the Dems are afraid of being ousted from power for a long long time because they destroyed our economy and ran rough shod over us and elevated this freak to the office of POTUS. So, all they are worried about now is brand recognition. They want the incompetent President whom they foisted on us, the tyrannical Nancy Pelosi whom they foisted on us, oh and the worthless Harry Reid not to mention all the bizarre czars...all of them the pride of the Dem party...not to be identified as ‘true Dems’. The source points out that some Dems are beginning to berate the president because they fear he is going down. Why...how noble of them. Kiss up to these worthless traitors on their way up, berate them on their way down.
The ‘source’ claims that the Dem fringe took over the Dem party. Newsflash - it was the Dem dream team who took over the Dem party.
Now that the worthless character and vision of Dems is exposed and going down in flames - the Dems want to cast all their leaders and banner careers as non-representative of the Dem party???? And somehow, we factor into these games or they wouldn’t be admitting to so many failures.
The next step in the narrative, as I recall, is a visit from "the brown suits".
this guy is an invention.
This is what the 4th or 5th story by him in the last couple of months?
Surely Fauxbama’s sycophants would have discovered who this person is and shut him down by now?
I like the story though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.