At this point, Obama doesn’t NEED to offer proof. Those making the accusation are required to offer proof.
Ever watch Perry Mason?
For example, in the Ruby Ridge killings, the defense didn’t even present a case. When the prosecution rested, the defense said it was so obvious that the prosecution had failed to prove its case that they had no need to present an argument. And they won.
Available for < $6 in hardback, used. Interesting book.
Hold that thought "at this point". The proof is being withheld from discovery by the courts...at this point.
Ever watch Perry Mason?
I've brought up Perry Mason a time or two on these threads. Your girl Obama may need to dig him up for her defense after all this is said and done.
If the President-elect shall have FAILED TO QUALIFY....
On whose shoulders does this requirement stand?
Does it say, “If somebody proves the President-elect didn’t qualified....”?