Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News sued by feds for retaliating against reporter Catherine Herridge in sex, age bias case
New York Daily News ^ | October 1, 2010 | Aliyah Shahid

Posted on 10/01/2010 11:07:17 AM PDT by Zakeet

It's looking like all out war against Fox News.

Just days after the president slammed the cable news network, declaring it "destructive" to America's long-term growth, the feds are suing Fox News for allegedly retaliating against a reporter who says she was discriminated against because of her age and gender.

It's the latest in increasingly hostile rhetoric against Fox News, not only from Obama but from Rahm Emanuel and the president's former communications director.

According to the lawsuit, filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Thursday, Catherine Herridge, a national correspondent who covers homeland security complained about discriminatory practices in the network starting in 2006.

Herridge, now 46, claimed "female and black correspondents were given less desirable shifts" in the network and that oftentimes assignments (including an anchor job) were denied or "taken away from her" due to her sex and age.

In 2008, the network said it found no evidence of bias, and when her contract came up for renewal, it included language barring her from making more discrimination complaints, according to the lawsuit.

Herridge, who joined Fox News in 1996 as a London correspondent, refused to sign the contract.

The lawsuit says the language in the contract was retaliatory.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bias; firstamendment; foxnews; lawsuit; lazwouldhitit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last
To: Zakeet
She needs to bleach her hair blonde it seems that all the women on there are blonde's..

I still will watch this network instead of any other..If not for the news just to piss off Obama..

21 posted on 10/01/2010 11:17:27 AM PDT by PLD (When you receive a kindness,remember it;when you bestow one,forget it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I think the case is the original claim against Fox, that they discriminated against females and blacks, not the contract dispute.


22 posted on 10/01/2010 11:17:58 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; Zakeet

EEOC is a federal agency. Anyone can file a complaint with them. Of course, that doesn’t mean the complaint has any validity. But my concern is that the Obama-regime thugs will be pulling the strings of the EEOC re: this matter, which is a no-no. This is an independent agency. There should be no pressure put upon the EEOC from higher-ups in the Exec. Branch. Murdoch needs his best attorneys on this case.


23 posted on 10/01/2010 11:19:47 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
If you want to see a lily white, all male broadcast team... just check out MSNBC!!!

Correction: If you want to see a lily white, all male (or very close to it) broadcast team... just check out MSNBC!!!


24 posted on 10/01/2010 11:20:33 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Character is defined by how we treat those who society says have no value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Looks like the only mistake Fox News made was hiring Catherine in the first place. If I were them, I'd tell the feds to go ahead and send in the troops cause we ain't rolling over.
25 posted on 10/01/2010 11:20:51 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Well, they have to find a way to shut FNC up somehow.


26 posted on 10/01/2010 11:21:09 AM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

I thought she was excellent also. And I think she’s gorgeous, so I’m kind of doubting that her age was a problem. Didn’t she have a baby not too long ago? Seems like I recall that the baby’s health was at risk.


27 posted on 10/01/2010 11:21:22 AM PDT by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Obambi and Holder certainly get themselves into idiotic situations.

Herridge is a contract employee. As such, like any other contract employee, she is assigned wherever Fox needs her. If she doesn't like her assignments then she needs to go elsewhere.

She was on with Megan Kelly this afternoon. ... shrug!!

And, I don't like her manner of reporting.

28 posted on 10/01/2010 11:21:38 AM PDT by xtinct (The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you..Be Strong Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

She filed a complaint with the Feds.


29 posted on 10/01/2010 11:21:43 AM PDT by ican'tbelieveit (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team# 36120), KW:Folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

“female and black correspondents were given less desirable shifts”

I’ve watched Fox. I thought being female (especially blond, natural or bleached) or black a was a big plus. I keep asking my husband, “can they find a knowledgeable commentator that isn’t a bleached blond or black woman (or Karl Rove?)


30 posted on 10/01/2010 11:22:13 AM PDT by pops88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I'm thinking abuse of process or wrongful civil litigation responses to the EEOC based on ulterior motive.

"Forced to work without a contract?" Presumably, she chose to work without the contract as a temporary basis likely under the terms of the previous contract. It's not ideal, but it is often used until there was a new agreement.

Also, what are the damages? She signed a contract.

31 posted on 10/01/2010 11:22:17 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Tim Walberg, a true conservative republican for Congress - http://www.walbergforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw

“Does the WH think this will chill Fox or more correctly give them a bigger audience? Dopes.”

Might give them a chance to claim all negative stories are retaliation for suing Fox News. Wonder if Fox has to disclose that it is being sued by the government everytime it reports on the DOJ or the administration?


32 posted on 10/01/2010 11:22:39 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: abb

Can you say.....totalitarian? Good, very good, I knew you could.


33 posted on 10/01/2010 11:23:01 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

Discrimination complaints generally go first to the federal EEOC. They investigate and either bring a lawsuit alleging discrimination or issue a “right to sue” letter to allow the person to file a private suit or do nothing.


34 posted on 10/01/2010 11:23:18 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
I dislike her cold demeanor. And I met her! REALLY cold demeanor.

She does not seem to have engaging "skill sets"

35 posted on 10/01/2010 11:23:36 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
One would think that Greta Alexander is living proof that Fox does not discriminate because of age, sex, looks etc.
36 posted on 10/01/2010 11:23:45 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Nobody reads tag lines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
A firing case involving a media enemy? Full steam ahead.

Actual voter intimidation during a presidential election by Black Panthers? No need to look at that.

37 posted on 10/01/2010 11:24:24 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The battle lines are drawn: On one side, are Dems and Repubs. On the other, the Tea Party (us).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

She should have bleached her hair...................


38 posted on 10/01/2010 11:25:19 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The EEOC is seeking unspecified monetary damages and a court order preventing the network from making similar retaliation against other employees.

Monetary damages to... who? Another Obama/SEIU slush fund?

39 posted on 10/01/2010 11:26:57 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElayneJ

I believe she donated part of her liver to the child. Can’t remember the details.


40 posted on 10/01/2010 11:27:34 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Not under the influence of Hope-nosis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson