Posted on 09/29/2010 4:35:58 PM PDT by B4Ranch
To find the reasons why we need high-speed rail, please visit my blog. We need to insist on HSR and defeat this attempt to shove rapid transit down our throats. Consider this: The United Nation’s Agenda 21 calls for permanently moving people from rural areas to cities. The U.N. wants nations to house people in controlled areas – cities with condos above office buildings and people riding bikes to work, not driving on streets and highways, etc. Rapid transit enables that.
Click Here to read full article
(Excerpt) Read more at pensacola.tenthamendmentcenter.com ...
Trains in Japan and Europe differ from America because of population density. “For example, Japan has 880 people living within one square mile, 653 people in Britain per square mile, while there are an average of only 86 people populating one square mile in the U.S., as there is a far greater land mass in the U.S. “The enormous inconvenience will make this system unpopular.(5)”
5.”http://www.newsweek.com/id/213347
You can repeat it all you want but you’ll be taking my word for it.
>>Its kinda funny. She complains that all the things American marxists claim as reasons to support some kind of communism, are the things that suffer most under communism. They support communism in the name of the environment, communism destroys the environment. They support communism in the name of human rights, human rights are nearly non existent under communism. In the all are equal communist societies, social stratification is most pronounced.<<
Sounds like a Progressive, I mean a Communist.
Doesn’t the Austin Zoo ( no, not the state capitol ) have a train?
Poor willie....Green Willie
She’ll be coming ‘round the mountain when she comes....
“And other parts of the country will never become so crowded that mass transit becomes an real option?”
Fine, wait until they have the economic base to support it.
“My understanding of this is that they regulate this land as non human to trade up for the carbon program.”
Thats one tactic, releasing 200 lbs wolves to discourage visitors is another.
I agree with your post ( I understand it was meant for x). I’ve lived in Asia where you could get a train, cab, or bus to anywhere from anywhere. It was very nice. Of course the population density was outrageous.
I remember being fascinated by the maps in the 70s showing the mega cities that would exist in 30 years. One city went from the east coast, through Toranto, windsor, Detroit, across michigan and wrapped around lake michigan at chicago.
Apparently it didn’t happen because I still live in the sticks right in the midst of that great mega city of the fuure.
A miniature train, I think.
LOL!
Thanks!
Now, you are the one pushing the Agenda 21
You're full of moonbat whacknut bullcrap.
Hey Green Willie, where have you gone?
I would apologize for the dogpile, but I imagine you would want to regulate them ( dogs. cats. etc... ) too.....
Oh, there you are my little tax hiker...
Who do you think is behind the idea of this high speed rail if it’s not the United Nations? City Mayors get all wound up in their Agenda 21 Programs and they try to push it off on the taxpayers.
Heck, half of them don’t realize that it’s a UNEP: United Nations Environment Programme - Energy and Transport
Remember: Life is like a roll of toilet paper.
The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes.
Whitman is BIG on Agenda 21
Part of an interview with Chelene Nightengale:
And, by the way, I noticed that former eBay CEO Meg Whitman is also running and as a Republican. I have to say that I thought Ms. Whitman was a staunch Progressive. Didn’t she say that she greatly admired self-avowed Communist and former ObamaCzar Van Jones and that she and he were on the same “climate change” cruise? And doesn’t she still support the now strongly discredited Global Warming theory? I have to say that, to me, she really sounds like Marxist-Lite.
Chelene: Unfortunately the Van Jones fan, Meg Whitman, is the biggest competitor. Thus far she has spent $60 million on her campaign in addition to manipulating the media (source: http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/04/14/whitman-accused-of-manipulating-media/). One must wonder why she is spending millions on an office that only pays $175,000 per year? She has made very few public campaign appearances, but our airwaves are flooded with her attack ads against her main GOP opponent. Per polls, she is leading all the gubernatorial candidates.
Yes, she appears to be a progressive and has a recorded history of donating to other like-minded progressives like Barbara Boxer and John Kerry. (Note – see info below questions.) Furthermore she did give a generous donation to the Environmental Defense Fund to save the smelt: (http://www.kcbs.com/pages/5706219.php?). The smelt is quite the controversy here in California since saving the fish has caused the Delta water pumps to be shut off in our Central Valley. The Central Valley is our state’s agriculture land and without the flow of water, we are losing over $2 billion in agriculture annually.
From my Whitman research, her support for the delta smelt is aligned with her support of global warming as well. Back in 2008, the former EBay CEO, did join Jimmy Carter, Tom Daschle, Ted Turner and others on a Global Climate Cruise. (http://www.cartercenter.org/news/trip_reports/arctic_July2008.html). Personally I am also troubled by her CFR connections and Goldman Sachs involvement. She resigned from Goldman Sachs after questions regarding the board’s financial records: (http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0419/Goldman-Sachs-could-roil-California-governor-race).
“Barbara Boxer is a courageous leader and friend of California’s technology industry,” extolled the former eBay executive in a Friends of Boxer release issued in April 30, 2003. Her name was part of an open letter signed by various technology leaders. The latest revelation came just days after the 53-year-old Whitman was forced to acknowledge that she hadn’t registered to vote until she was 46.”
In addition Whitman donated to the following campaigns:
Whitman donated $1,000 to John Kerry in 1999, $1,000 to Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-NY, in 2006; $1,000 to Sen. Ben Nelson, D-NE, in 2006; $1,000 to Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-WA, in 2002; $2,000 to Rep. Mike Honda, D-San Jose, in 2002.
Sher: You are involved with working to stop Agenda 21—a United Nations program ostensibly based upon depopulating great portions of the planet of human beings. This is beyond Orwellian and goes to the very fabric of our existence. California has had its water in the once rich farming area of the Central Valley turned off and Mr. Obama recently used it politically in order to get 2 California Democrats’ votes for his ObamaCare. Would you tell my readers about this, the problems surrounding Agenda 21 with respect to California and how you, as Governor, would stop it?
Chelene: Michael Shaw, an attorney and owner of The Liberty Garden, a nature retreat specializing in native California plants exposed the “Global Biodiversity Assessment Report” which states - “Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere.” Shaw was formerly active with the Santa Cruz County Planning Board which was one of the first counties to be approached to implement Agenda 21. California is without a doubt the targeted stated for sustainable development with the passing of AB 32 and our state’s man-made drought due to the UN modeled “Endangered Species Act.”
To combat the global agenda, I would turn the water on! Our current governor has not been telling us the truth. The governor has the power to go turn the water on without federal permission. And the county sheriff has the authority to arrest any federal agent that enters the property to turn the water off. Furthermore I would abolish AB 32 which is decimating state business. (AB 32 is the “Global Warming Solutions Act” based on UN science.) Following the Native American Indian model, I would create fish hatcheries in order to increase the salmon and smelt population while allowing the free flow of water throughout our state.
Agenda 21 is also another example on why strengthening state independence is vital for the longevity and livelihood of our communities. The Federal government is increasingly beholden to the UN then forcing states to follow suit. Not only is this not Constitutional, it is also detrimental to the prosperity of our nation.http://www.borderfirereport.net/sher-zieve/chelene-nightingale-the-conservative-ca-gubernatorial-candidate-pick.php
www.nightingaleforgovernor.com.
Since there are ladies on FR.com I won’t express my feelings about Meg Whitman.
There is no reason why states need to roll belly up to the FEDS every time a dollar is offered. They need to read their State Constitutions and learn the operating rules.
The American empire is headed for the sewage pipe.
Well, hmmm, I’m thinking..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.