Skip to comments.
Successful Tea Party Movement Must Include Pro-Life Issues, Not Just Economy
Life News ^
| 8/31/10
| Tom Glessner
Posted on 08/31/2010 4:17:24 PM PDT by wagglebee
LifeNews.com Note: Tom Glessner is a pro-life attorney who is the president of NIFLA, the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates. NIFLA is an organization with more than 1,200 affiliated pregnancy centers that provides legal, medical and practical help for pregnancy centers across the country.
Political change is blowing in the wind but it is not the change promised by Barack Obama when he ran for the presidency. For sure, Obama has brought political change to the nation, but his transformational policies have meant bigger government, higher taxes, federal subsidies of abortion on demand, and greater governmental control over the lives of American citizens.
Hundreds of thousands of citizens across the nation have raised their voices to protest Obamas policies of change. They are crying out for a different change that will honor the integrity of each individual and create an atmosphere where true liberty in all spheres of life economic, cultural, and spiritual- reigns. Political pollsters are now predicting a huge seismic shift in the political landscape this November. The recent Glenn Beck sponsored rally in Washington D.C., attended by thousands upon thousands of grass roots activists, indicates that this public outcry of protest is real and powerful.
The Tea Party movement is comprised of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents from all walks of life. The political ruling elite, the corporate world, and the media have completely failed to comprehend this populist movement dismissing it as marginal, extreme and even racist. However, this movement is not composed of ignorant and bigoted individuals, as suggested by the political class. Rather, it is an authentic grassroots movement of thoughtful and patriotic people demanding real change from an out-of-touch political establishment.
The Tea Party movement, for the most part, centers its protest on economic issues and concern about the loss of freedom that an ever-growing federal government brings. These concerns are valid and appropriate. Most leaders of this movement also believe in the sanctity of life and the need to halt the wholesale destruction of innocent human life through abortion and other life related issues such as embryonic stem cell research. However, many in the Tea Party movement have made it clear that while they are sympathetic with the pro-life cause, the abortion issue is not formally part of the Tea Party agenda.
Economic issues are a vital concern; as is the growing size of the federal government and its overreaching into the lives of ordinary citizens. The overwhelming burden of excess regulation and taxation upon businesses and individuals is alarming. In the same manner, however, the killing of 1.25 million unborn children annually from abortion must be a grave concern. Accordingly, a failure by the Tea Party to incorporate the serious pro-life concerns of millions of Americans into its agenda will be fatal to achieving success.
Perhaps, the Tea Party should take a lesson from the old fashioned three-legged milking stool. When I was a child I visited my aunt and uncle on their dairy farm and was intrigued watching my uncle milk the cows while sitting on a three-legged stool. I asked him why he used such a funny chair to milk the cows. He explained that a four-legged chair can be unbalanced if one of its legs is a different length than the others and it could even tip over if you leaned backwards. A three-legged stool, on the other hand, balances evenly and won't tip over even if one of its legs is longer
We should learn something from the old-fashioned milking stool. There are three legs to a successful agenda that will change America for the better. Each leg is critical and the current grassroots movement for change in America will collapse if any of these legs is ignored. These legs are:
1) Revival of the Economy: This leg requires the establishment a strong robust economy that creates full employment and does not burden small businesses with taxes and oppressive regulations that hinder job development. Limited government and reduced taxation are at the core and are necessary to bring the nation out of the serious economic recession/depression in which we find ourselves.
2) Maintaining a Strong National Defense and Protecting Homeland Security: This leg requires a serious commitment by the government to win the war on terror and protect our countrys border from those who would illegally enter and do us harm.
3) Protecting the Family Unit and Restoring the Right to Life for All: The social issues protecting the sanctity of marriage and restoring the right to life are issues of equal importance. Millions of Americans, including myself, have placed these issues at the top of the priority list for the next generation of political leaders to seriously address.
To date, while it appears that most Tea Party leaders verbally support all three legs of this milk stool some, such as Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, assert that the social issues (and specifically abortion and the right to life) must take a back seat to the other two legs, which are seen as more important.
A further example of this viewpoint was shown in a recent interview of Sarah Palin with Sean Hannity of Fox News. Gov. Sarah Palin, a committed pro-life leader, was asked to name the top five issues facing the country today and the deaths of 1.25 million unborn annually from abortion was not on her list. If, indeed, this is the approach a new Congress takes after the November mid-term elections, then the agenda of the Tea Party movement will fail.
America must be forewarned. A nation that fails to protect the lives of its most vulnerable members has set a course for itself that will lead to its eventual destruction from within. The killing of future generations through the act of abortion has already taken a toll on the demographical future of the nation and the Western world. Unless this trend is stopped then, notwithstanding the impact of the Tea Party movement, our culture and nation will have effectively committed suicide.
The invention of the three-legged milking stool was truly ingenious. Will the current populist movement for change understand this and formally incorporate the life issues into its agenda? Time will tell and the future of America hangs in the balance.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-339 next last
To: gogogodzilla; Coleus; narses; Salvation; cpforlife.org; EternalVigilance; BykrBayb; ...
Eh, all this tells me is that social conservatives have no interest in reigning in an out of control government, cutting federal spending, and devolving power to the states. Why because we aren't willing to sacrifice human life?
Anything is good as long as abortion is banned! No, really, ANYTHING! Forced anal goat sex on pain of death, fine... as long as abortion's banned. Turning the citizenry into slaves of the state, that's fine too! Just gimme dat old-time abortion ban!
You are an IDIOT if you believe this is what social conservatives want.
21
posted on
08/31/2010 4:56:42 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Maceman
“...The founders would never have come together for independence,
or to ratify the Constitution...”
-
Point of trivial input:
They came together for independence and ratified the Articles of Confederation;
which was replaced by the Constitution seven years later.
22
posted on
08/31/2010 4:56:47 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(If November does not turn out well, then beware of December.)
To: wagglebee
**Successful Tea Party Movement Must Include Pro-Life Issues, Not Just Economy**
An absolute!
23
posted on
08/31/2010 4:57:44 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: wagglebee
I’m extremely Pro Life. My vote will not ever go to an abortion candidate for any office.
However, I don’t think we can demand that an entity that is as spontaneous like the Tea Party be forced to take on social issues.
After being at quite a few local Tea parties, I would imagine that some TeaParties will take on social and abortion issues and others will not.
The coalescing issue though for the Tea Parties seems to be cut spending, cut the deficit, more liberty and Constitutional guidance.
We can’t manufacture issues in a group that was born on other issues. The Reagan coalition was unique in that it forged ties between both economic and social conservatives.
The Republican Party is still focused on all 3 legs, econ, social and national security...that is what important.
24
posted on
08/31/2010 5:00:30 PM PDT
by
rbmillerjr
(A loud band of PaulBots, Isolationists, Protectionists, 911Inside Jobnuts, 3rdParty Loud Irrelevants)
To: rbmillerjr
However, I dont think we can demand that an entity that is as spontaneous like the Tea Party be forced to take on social issues. I agree, but some have noticed that some in the Tea Party are trying to force social conservatives out.
25
posted on
08/31/2010 5:03:36 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Neah.
The Tea Party is about high taxes and excessive spending. It needs to stay as focused on that as possible.
There might be niche for complaining about “aborting the future prosperity and greatness of this nation,” though.
26
posted on
08/31/2010 5:03:48 PM PDT
by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
To: gogogodzilla
I’m not willing to sacrifice conservatism of any kind. Avaricious opportunists who call themselves fiscal conservatives are anything but conservative. We do not need to murder the most vulnerable members of society to balance the budget. Conservatism does not exist only on a bank ledger. It encompasses all aspects of life. You’re either conservative or you’re not. If you reject the concept of conservatism, but embrace a few aspects that support your self-centered wants and needs, you’re not a conservative.
27
posted on
08/31/2010 5:07:23 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: wagglebee
They can’t force us out (and I say us as a econ, social and natsecurity conservative).
Who would even have the power to do this...that is what I love about the TeaParty, there is not true leader, no true lead group.
When Tea Parties are called we come with signs against abortion and big government...nothing anybody can do about that. My local TeaParty would fall apart with social conservatives...many signs with God written on them.
28
posted on
08/31/2010 5:07:25 PM PDT
by
rbmillerjr
(A loud band of PaulBots, Isolationists, Protectionists, 911Inside Jobnuts, 3rdParty Loud Irrelevants)
To: Maceman
I also respectfully disagree.
Fixing the tax code and then severely shrinking government spending de-funds many left wing organizations who exist mostly through grants, thereby equalizing the battlefield between social conservatives and the lefty monsters.
One battle at a time...
To: fightinJAG; iowamark; Lazlo in PA; Coleus; narses; Salvation; cpforlife.org; EternalVigilance; ...
Fiscal conservatism is the only way to preserve LIBERTY. Without liberty, the government naturally will impose all manner of morally nihlistic policies and have the power to FORCE citizens to comply with them.I respectfully disagree with your premise. Fiscal conservatism can occur in tyrannies as well as libertarian republics. The whole premise behind our constitutional republic was one of NATURAL LAW, and chief among the rights of men in a Natural Law society is the right to life followed by Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. So I do not believe we can have functioning liberty without a fundamental respect for life and abortion is antithetical to Natural Law since it deprives the most innocent and helpless individual of all liberties.
Therefore unless the people who claim to want to return our Nation to its foundational principles include within those principles the fundamental right to life, then we will never achieve the goal of restoring or preserving Liberty.
30
posted on
08/31/2010 5:10:06 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: rbmillerjr
“TeaParty would fall apart WITHOUT social conservatives”...that is.
To: Maceman
Agreed. Stick to Taxed Enough Already. It is a message that is a plainly understandable as it is vital.
Let the culture war be fought in other venues.
32
posted on
08/31/2010 5:11:08 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
To: wagglebee
Sorry no ... I disagree. Within the Tea Party movement, we have a mission statement and core values. The Tea Party is about Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets. If you want to go fight out the abortion issue, make your own platform, but don't drag this issue up on "our" platform.
Mission Statement
The impetus for the Tea Party movement is excessive government spending and taxation. Our mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize our fellow citizens to secure public policy consistent with our three core values of Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets.
Core Values
* Fiscal Responsibility: Fiscal Responsibility by government honors and respects the freedom of the individual to spend the money that is the fruit of their own labor. A constitutionally limited government, designed to protect the blessings of liberty, must be fiscally responsible or it must subject its citizenry to high levels of taxation that unjustly restrict the liberty our Constitution was designed to protect. Such runaway deficit spending as we now see in Washington D.C. compels us to take action as the increasing national debt is a grave threat to our national sovereignty and the personal and economic liberty of future generations.
* Constitutionally Limited Government: We, the members of The Tea Party Patriots, are inspired by our founding documents and regard the Constitution of the United States to be the supreme law of the land. We believe that it is possible to know the original intent of the government our founders set forth, and stand in support of that intent. Like the founders, we support states rights for those powers not expressly stated in the Constitution. As the government is of the people, by the people and for the people, in all other matters we support the personal liberty of the individual, within the rule of law.
* Free Markets: A free market is the economic consequence of personal liberty. The founders believed that personal and economic freedom were indivisible, as do we. Our current governments interference distorts the free market and inhibits the pursuit of individual and economic liberty. Therefore, we support a return to the free market principles on which this nation was founded and oppose government intervention into the operations of private business.
I happen to be PRO LIFE, but I'll fight that battle in a different way. Keep the Tea Party Focused.
33
posted on
08/31/2010 5:14:58 PM PDT
by
ThePatriotsFlag
(If you aren't at Obama's Table, you are probably on the MENU! - The Patriot's Flag)
To: wagglebee
"All persons have a
right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness".
The pro-Life movement sqaures perfectly with the principles espoused in the US Constitution.
L
34
posted on
08/31/2010 5:17:24 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: ThePatriotsFlag; BykrBayb; EternalVigilance; metmom; trisham; little jeremiah
he Tea Party is about Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets. If you want to go fight out the abortion issue, make your own platform, but don't drag this issue up on "our" platform. So, what you're saying is that the Tea Party movement is actually re-branded libertarianism and NOT conservative?
35
posted on
08/31/2010 5:18:01 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
The TEA party movement is about fiscal conservatism. Regular republicans are mostly pro-life. We have plenty of conservative coalitions and 99 percent of them are pro-life whether they say so or not. The republican party has drifted from fiscal conservatism and that is the role of the TEA party. I don’t see a problem.
To: wagglebee
The GOP has lost every election since Roe? You may have been in prison or working with the peace corps when Reagan won in 80, Bush I in 88, the 94 landslide, and Bush II in ‘00. I don’t see alot of Life talk this coming landslide either.
Secondly, there is nothing close to a grass roots movement on the Anti-death side. It barely comes up in conversation other than at church. It is only a hot button issue for a few. You can’t even get all Catholics on board.
Finally, McLame lost because he is a tired, burned-out, political hack, professional loser. Not because of his Life bonifides, which he stated on the campaign trail regularly to sell his conservatism.
To: Lazlo in PA
The GOP has lost every election since Roe? You may have been in prison or working with the peace corps when Reagan won in 80, Bush I in 88, the 94 landslide, and Bush II in 00. Learn to read, here is what I wrote:
The GOP has LOST every election since Roe v. Wade when abortion was ignored.
38
posted on
08/31/2010 5:30:00 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: fightinJAG
You have to have a moral structure for capitalism to be possible and successful. All of the Founders expressed the importance of the moral order for the economic order to succeed. With a moral people, government hardly ever has to step in. That is what we are all about....freedom from government interference.
So, for that freedom, the laws have to be based on Natural Law to be just with the underlying notion that all people have the right to life, and can pursue happiness (The Founders KNEW that without virtue, there could be no happiness). Morality can NOT be separated from government. It is not possible.
Tea Partiers have to understand that you can’t separate material, monetary matters from the metaphysical need of mankind. Won’t work. You can’t have a void...it will fill with either immorality, chaos, moral order or whatever—you have to deal with the situtation and can’t HOPE for it to disappear. It can’t go anywhere!!!
The morality is the base that has to be outlined to set up the structure for all economics. It HAS to be from the bottom up, because we have gotten so far away from the Constitution, everything has to be torn down. We should start over....is what the tea party has to do....get back to the Constitution and build from there.
To: Lazlo in PA; wagglebee
Read what Wagglebee wrote again. You missed part of it, which changes the entire meaning.
40
posted on
08/31/2010 5:31:55 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-339 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson