Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To The Tea Party (And Related Organizations) [Major BARF Alert - JimRob]
Market Ticker ^ | 29 August 2010 | Karl Denninger

Posted on 08/29/2010 9:24:21 PM PDT by Lorianne

You're not going to want to hear this.

Nonetheless, you have to.

If you want to win - indeed, if you want to make any sort of serious inroad into the American Political Process, you need to read this, you need to listen, and you need to adopt this path.

If you do not, you will be marginalized into irrelevance, no matter what else you do.

Here it is:

You must discard - intentionally - all "wedge issues" as points of debate, discussion, or campaigning. You know what these issues are - they fall broadly into the category of religion in one form or another.

These are issues such as abortion and gay rights (in all it's forms, including marriage debates), but is by no means limited to these two. In short, if there's a religious basis for your position, you must not campaign on it, and indeed you must pointedly refuse to discuss it.

The Tea Party began as a protest over bailouts and handouts - that is, theft and corruption within our markets, government and economy. This is a winning position with 90% of the American Body Politic.

Any candidate who runs on these issues - and these issues alone, promising to stop it and lock up the scammers - all of them - wins.

As soon as you bring the other issues that everyone wants to talk about into this, you will lose.

Here's why.

These are called "wedge issues" for a reason.

What you personally believe is irrelevant to the political process. These issues are used by the two main political parties to get the electorate to divide on a 50/50 basis - thus leaving them having to persuade exactly one person of their position on some other issue to win.

You cannot win such a contest. At best you can force one of the other parties - the one that most agrees with you - to lose. The reason is simple - you will split that half of the electorate, which means the other party - the one that disagrees with your position on those issues - wins the election.

Drill this into your head folks:

If you allow these issues to become part of your campaign, you will not only lose you will cause the party that most-agrees with you to lose.

I know this is going to be unpopular, but it needs to be said. I've seen this happening in some of the local Tea Party groups, and it saddens me. The local Niceville branch here featured people talking about "natural law" as an important qualifying factor for political candidacy, as just one of many examples. There were times I felt like I had walked into a Baptist sermon.

The Tea Party and other political expressions like it are, of course, free to run on whatever platform they'd like, and to back candidates based on whatever they'd like. But if you're going to do this, then you'd be wise to try to take over the Republican Party instead of being "independent" or any other sort of "outside" influence, because it is the only way you can win with this approach.

The Tea Party infiltrating The Republican establishment is a long shot. Witness John McCain, who made a campaign spectacle out of bailing out the banks. How's JD Hayworth doing in challenging him? He lost, right? How'd that happen? The same way it always happens: Hayworth let the campaign's terms include those wedge issues, and then got tattoed by the guy with the bigger warchest and the ability to threaten people politically.

You either change the terms of the debate and the issues upon which the election is decided or you lose.

It's that simple.

(excerpted)


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: denninger; moralabsolutes; partyofrhinos; progressives; ticker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-280 next last
To: Lorianne

I agree with this completely. However, too many believe that the govt. is controlled by the social beliefs of politicians. At this point in our country’s history we really need to focus on fiscal policy, the Constitution and freedom.


141 posted on 08/30/2010 3:47:45 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Let the cowards who are afraid of abortion and homosexual marriage come our way and hold their noses to vote for our candidates. They always want us to compromise our morals so they can say they are Conservatives, but not like those intolerant Conservatives. Basically cowards afraid to take a stand. Those are the ones who need to be thrown out cause they compromise everything else too.

Pray for America


142 posted on 08/30/2010 4:42:43 AM PDT by bray (A fun read: http://www.brayincandy.com/id239.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
This Country and our Constitution will not stand without God and the Judeo/Christian values.

Our founding fathers even admitted this.

This article is just another piece of leftist claptrap designed to get conservatives to shut up before they do create a tidal wave and return our Country to it greatness.

143 posted on 08/30/2010 5:08:22 AM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“Ducking issues by just ignoring them because you’re afraid it will mess up your ‘unity’ - well, then there wasn’t much ‘unity’ there in the first place.

The Tea Party would be better off then if it just focused on one or two related issues as an advocacy group, like for people just focused on cutting all non-essential government spending and waste.”

I don’t advocate ‘ducking’ issues. I see this as almost life or death for this country and we must take it a step at a time.

First we must get that progressive liberal congress quashed. I am sure you have noticed that in spite of public uproar indicated by the polls, the MAJORITY of the ‘people’ (conservatives, independents, et al) are against the health care bill, bail outs, illegal immigration, trying terrorist in civilian courts, the ground zero mosque,..... ad infinitum.

Public opinion has no effect on the progressive liberal...they know what is good for us and they know where they want to take us. And we are going to go there whether we like it or not.

THAT trend at this time is the most important factor. We have to stop this train.

Everyone has a right to practice their choice of religion and people have a choice not to practice or not to believe.

Too many so called Christians preach just another form of hate. Too many are of the mind set that they know what is best and what is good for you. Too many rant and rave about hell and damnation. That type of Christianity does not engender a true spiritual belief in Christ. That is not the way of Christ.

To engender a deep spiritual change in the liberal progressive (the narcissistic, self loving persona) the above approach will NEVER work.

We must work against big government. We must work to effect a more ethical, moral society by example, not by ranting. We must use the constitution as our strength and imprimatur...not any specific religion.

We can individually live our lives according to the tenets of our individual faith, using the wonder of that faith and love to influence the lost....not mandates or ravings.

Otherwise we will lose this nation.


144 posted on 08/30/2010 6:23:17 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"You cannot effect any change on social issues if you don’t WIN."

And if you win with a bunch of lilly-livered RINOs and Losertarians, who don't have the backbone to take up social change, what have you gained? Nothing.

Better to show the nation you have guts. To paraphrase one of the best lines in Braveheart, "people don't follow nobility, they follow courage."

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

145 posted on 08/30/2010 6:46:38 AM PDT by wku man (Steel yourselves, patriots, and be ready. Won't be long now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight
We must work against big government. We must work to effect a more ethical, moral society by example, not by ranting. We must use the constitution as our strength and imprimatur...not any specific religion.

Exactly right. Too many people on this thread are obsessed with attacking symptoms. The cancer is the unrestrained growth of government power - until it is stopped cold, these other symptoms cant even be treated. Denninger is exactly right - running against corruption means running not only against Obama, but the McCains and Murkowskis and all of their ruling class ilk which have almost completely taken over the Republican Party. The Tea Party has a chance to become a genuine second party (we're not even talking about a third party, yet) but only if they stay focused on the only issues that matter - limiting government power and ending corruption.

146 posted on 08/30/2010 6:59:36 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ( "The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." - Rowan Atkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Why bother to vote, then, if our candidate is the same as theirs?


147 posted on 08/30/2010 7:04:04 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Denninger supported Obama,...

Can you point me to a source please?

148 posted on 08/30/2010 7:05:45 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I agree regarding the TEA movement.

The GOP would do well not to drop social issues, but as far as getting elected this year and 2012: “It’s the Economy Stupid!”


149 posted on 08/30/2010 7:10:35 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Congressmen should serve two terms: One in Congress and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If we give up the fight for any of our unalienable rights, America is no more. Our rights are granted by God, not government, and the purpose of the Tea party movement is to preserve, protect and defend these rights for ourselves and our posterity. And who are we defending them from? The government. And the sleazy politicians who would like us to not defend them so it would make it easier for them to get elected. No thanks. A man who cannot or will not defend our unalienable rights — ALL of them — does not deserve our support and should NOT be elected.

**************************

Excellent post.

150 posted on 08/30/2010 7:12:01 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bump.


151 posted on 08/30/2010 7:15:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (I don't believe in atheists. And nihilists are nothing to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Review his comments to the TickerForum from 2007 - 2008 is all I can suggest.


152 posted on 08/30/2010 7:37:24 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Agreed! We have got to be smart, not emotional.


153 posted on 08/30/2010 7:45:38 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Without social conservatives, the Republican will lose by default.

BINGO.

154 posted on 08/30/2010 7:53:55 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This becomes much less of an issue if you close the primaries. Allowing independents or crossover voters to chose your candidate is about as smart as shipping a million U.S. ballots to China and asking them to fill them out. Dilute the conservative votes, get diluted candidates.


155 posted on 08/30/2010 7:55:03 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Would you rather be right or successful?


156 posted on 08/30/2010 7:55:08 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Denninger supported Obama

Ah. In other words, then: no more worth being taken seriously by rational, intelligent adults than (say) Markos Moulitsas, or Arianna Huffington. Gotcha. ;)

157 posted on 08/30/2010 7:57:40 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
The comments at Denninger’s are vile...they REALLY hate Christians, Southerners, and conservatives, at his site.

You just saved me however much time and effort it would have taken to slog through the standard issue leftard yipping and frothing myself, then. Thank you. ;)

158 posted on 08/30/2010 8:01:54 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; Kimberly GG
Would you rather be right or successful?

"What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?" - Jesus Christ

"Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God." -- George Washington


159 posted on 08/30/2010 8:09:57 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (I don't believe in atheists. And nihilists are nothing to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We’re not interested in electing more RINOs!! RINOs are the enemy!!

Bless you, Jim!!!


160 posted on 08/30/2010 8:18:16 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (http://www.conservatives4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson