Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Compromise could expose Islamophobes (DOPEY ROEPER ALERT)
Chicago SunTimes ^ | August 25, 2010 | RICHARD 'DOPEY' ROEPER Sun-Times Columnist

Posted on 08/25/2010 5:01:08 PM PDT by Chi-townChief

Agreeing to move mosque a few blocks would put bigots on spot

Time magazine's cover phrases the question in stark terms: Is America Islamophobic?

What the anti-mosque uproar tells us about how the U.S. regards Muslims

To answer the question: No. The United States of America, population 305 million, is not Islamophobic.

But there's no doubt a sizable percentage of Americans are indeed suspicious and resentful of Muslims.

In addition to revisiting the ongoing and still-heated controversy about the proposed Islamic cultural center two blocks from Ground Zero (did you know that Muslims have been praying at that site for nearly a year now?), the Time story says "at least six mosque projects across the U.S. have faced bitter opposition."

A doctor in Sheboygan County, Wis., was reportedly stunned by the level of opposition to his plans to open a mosque in the town of Ootsburg.

"I never expected that the same people who came to me at the hospital and treated me with respect would talk to me like this," says the doctor.

Opponents of the "Ground Zero mosque" say it's too close to sacred ground. (Apparently they don't care that liquor stores and strip clubs are just as close to that sacred ground.) Advocates say if Imam Feisal Rauf and his wife Daisy Khan back off from the Park51 project, it's a blow to freedom and a victory for those who don't respect the Constitution.

Even among the opposition, few are disputing that the planners have the legal RIGHT to build the center. They're saying it's inappropriate, morally wrong, antagonistic.

Part of me wishes Rauf and Khan would find a site about six or eight or 10 blocks from Ground Zero, and announce that while they know they had every right to build on the first proposed site and they're not backing down from intolerance, the whole idea of the community center is to promote interfaith understanding -- so they're going to build at this new site, out of respect to the families of the victims of Sept. 11 and as a gesture of compromise and healing.

How does anyone argue with that? Are the protesters going to say, "10 blocks is still too close to Ground Zero!" They'd look like fools -- or be exposed for their anti-Islam prejudice. No longer would they be able to cloak their intolerance in the memory of Sept. 11.

mailto:rroeper@suntimes.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: groundzero; groundzeromosque; islam; liberals; mosque; nicetryjackoff
Funny how this fool Roeper doesn't realize that Rauf and Khan can't move the mosque because they'd lose the provovation it creates on the WTC site.
1 posted on 08/25/2010 5:01:20 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Opponents of the "Ground Zero mosque" say it's too close to sacred ground. (Apparently they don't care that liquor stores and strip clubs are just as close to that sacred ground.)

Because the World Trade Center wasn't destroyed by Johnny Walker and Marilyn Mellons you d-bag. Love them or hate them, strip clubs and liquor stores are inherently American.

2 posted on 08/25/2010 5:06:27 PM PDT by infidel29 (Since 0bama is NOT a uniter, can we change the acronym to just plain P.O.S.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Izzzlam is America's new militant black movement. I hear it doesn't take much provocation to have one of them blow up in your face.

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."

3 posted on 08/25/2010 5:11:55 PM PDT by Viking2002 (2010 - NO PRISONERS! NO QUARTER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
so they're going to build at this new site, out of respect to the families of the victims of Sept. 11 and as a gesture of compromise and healing.

So you compromise and show respect by building a monument to the very thing that caused it? Not hardly.

No, it's being built as a full blown, in-your-face, finger-flipping TEACHING moment so they can stand their and scream 'we WON!'

[Gee. Where have I heard that before? /s]

4 posted on 08/25/2010 5:14:08 PM PDT by MamaTexan (Americans will remain enslaved until they realize the LAW isn't whatever government says it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
We Americans have every right to feel as we do. Few Muslims stand up as Americans.

You can't have two loyalties....not in this case....because the teachings of Islam are not religious teachings, they are "political" teachings.

5 posted on 08/25/2010 5:36:02 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Funny the left never does a piece about how anti-christian some elements of the country is.

Want some real fun? Read the storyand replace ‘muslim’ with ‘christian’. You’ll never see the MSM standing up for the overwhelming Christian majority here.


6 posted on 08/25/2010 6:17:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

You can tell the Sun-Times got the Islamic talking points memo as they repeated, almost verbatim the meme about the liquor stores and strip clubs. Offensive to some, but especially to adherents of the faith [except when getting ready to blow themselves up] yet misses the significant point that strippers and sellers of alcohol didn’t fly planes into buildings in the name of lap dances and drinky-poos.

Man, it’s almost sad to see their arguments reduced to the absurd.


7 posted on 08/25/2010 7:21:30 PM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
You’ll never see the MSM standing up for the overwhelming Christian majority here.

To my recollection, this is the very first instance of the left standing up for a religion in my lifetime.

I wonder what got into them...

8 posted on 08/25/2010 7:28:14 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01

It’s because it’s a religion that they do not understand that Christians they hate, are opposed to.

They believe they won’t get hurt. They believe we are making this stuff up about the muslims. They don’t think sharia will ever be set up in America. They don’t think they will ever be targeted as long as they are ‘tolerant’.


9 posted on 08/25/2010 7:59:29 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson