Primary losses blunt Palin's 'mama grizzly' claws

Google/AP ^ | 8/19/10 | Phil Eliot

[pissant]

WASHINGTON — It's been a summer of setbacks for Sarah Palin. Candidate "cubs" endorsed by the Mama Grizzly in Chief have been suffering a recent string of primary election losses.

[swheats]

They must not have heard about the kiss of death yet.

Who's doing the reporting? Journalistas may not meet as they did but they're still on a mission to build up Palin and tear her down in the end.

[dforest]

That is the most ridiculous post I have ever seen on this site.

[Randy Larsen]

LOL!

Nail, meet hammer!

[allmendream]

Oh, and shall the sin of welfare be visited upon the children for seven generations?

Change the game. People have been gamed. Don't hate the playa hate the game! ;)

Just like I cannot blame an illegal immigrant. If I were there I would want to be here, making money.

We gotta change that game as well.

[rintense]

I’d like to elevate that to real humans don’t vote for scumbags.

[rintense]

There is a fine line between posting dislike for her views vs. dislike for women politicians. There's an even finer one between dislike and obsession. And there is absolutely no excuse for misogyny disguised as dislike.

If you can't tell the different, well... I shall pray for you.

[rintense]

You win post of the day! LOLOLOL!

[ansel12]

"Yeah, well the proof is women put the first black gay muslim in the WH"
"If I were a woman, I wouldn’t want to vote knowing my gender was going to destroy our country."

It seems that the media has been misleading many of us on the "female vote", Democrats often or usually win the "female" vote but white females are in the Republican camp, and it turns out that the majority of them, have been in almost every election, including those predating this chart.

[hinckley buzzard]

Do you think all criticism should be shut down?

Come up with substantive criticism instead of weird psychosexual personal problems taken out on Sarah Palin, and we can talk.

[rintense]

Ouch!

[hinckley buzzard]

Hunter? Isn't he retired from the back bench to the park bench? Nice enough guy, but a space filler. Give him ten million dollars and he still wouldn't get more than hundred votes.

[GladesGuru]

The issue of who should vote goes to the core of the Republic and its future. For any interested, this site was written by what I assume is a recognized conservative, and may be of interest in terms of this thread:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.1840/pub_detail.asp

I would be curious as to what anyone thinks of the article and whether it is relevant to this thread.

[militanttoby]

Of course it’s accurate, but that’s hardly the point of the thread anymore.

Hope you don't believe the PDS lies.

If you did, you'd believe them when they said some months ago that hardly ANYONE would want her endorsement - too polarizing.

If you did, you'd believe them when they said she wasn't having an impact even just a few weeks ago, when it was almost impossible to deny it - but deny they did, anyway.

So go ahead and believe them when they say she is no longer effective.

Perhaps you should start to think for yourself.

[militanttoby]

That is the most ridiculous post I have ever seen on this site.

Eh? Your posts could be summed up as a whine-fest.

[militanttoby]

Irrelevant.

[Pan_Yan]

What are you talking about? I’m not trying to defend pissant’s little anti-Palin crusade, his comments or his views. As I’ve already said I think he’s a tool. But the creepy comment about Palin inflatable dolls was not made by pissant, but by someone attacking him. And disagreement with someone is a far cry from projecting triwsted fantasies on them and taking cheap shots at their family.

If you can’t tell the different, well... I shall pray for you.

[Pan_Yan]

Note to self: spell check.

[dforest]

Yours is the second most idiotic post. Congratulations, sparky.

[rintense]

Hey, don’t dish it out if you can’t take. Plain and simple.

[paulycy]

I love a chart that says where the white women be at.