Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Primary losses blunt Palin's 'mama grizzly' claws
Google/AP ^ | 8/19/10 | Phil Eliot

Posted on 08/19/2010 3:04:34 PM PDT by pissant

WASHINGTON — It's been a summer of setbacks for Sarah Palin. Candidate "cubs" endorsed by the Mama Grizzly in Chief have been suffering a recent string of primary election losses.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: ihatepalin; mamagrissly; mamarino; palin; pinkoelephants; pissantbashnpalin; pissantogyny; pissogyny; rino; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241 next last
To: Jim Robinson

JimRob BUMP!


121 posted on 08/19/2010 4:14:46 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Mexico is the U.S. version of Hamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: lookout88

That’s silly. I’m a woman and I vote conservative candidates all the way. Maybe if you’re white you won’t vote because plenty of them put Obama in office as well.


122 posted on 08/19/2010 4:15:08 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
FWIW, I think SP would rather support a fighter who may have an 85% conservative approval rating than some mealy mouthed backbencher with a 95% rating. We need candidates who are going to be willing to take the fight to liberals 24/7 regardless of the issue.
123 posted on 08/19/2010 4:15:08 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You know, we all know you can’t abide Sarah Palin, for whatever reason, and you’ve been mean before, but that was just ugly and unnecessary.


124 posted on 08/19/2010 4:15:52 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rintense; altura
Sick might be more descriptive:


125 posted on 08/19/2010 4:16:38 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

You make no sense. Single white women got obama in. Just facts


126 posted on 08/19/2010 4:20:05 PM PDT by lookout88 (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Hey, your account’s still active :-)


127 posted on 08/19/2010 4:20:07 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Not all of her endorsements have won, and I never expected that they would, nor, I would expect, did she. Many of those she endorsed were lesser known candidates, but they got their messages out, as Sarah hoped they would.

I think she wanted them to win, and so did all of us. If this isn't about winning power back from the dems, I guess I missed something.

I ask again--are the facts in the article accurate? Anybody?

128 posted on 08/19/2010 4:23:33 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown. -- written by Robert Towne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: lookout88

Plenty of MEN voted for Obama, too, so don’t blame us FOR that GOOBER!


129 posted on 08/19/2010 4:29:51 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

FWIW, I think SP would rather support a fighter who may have an 85% conservative approval rating than some mealy mouthed backbencher with a 95% rating. We need candidates who are going to be willing to take the fight to liberals 24/7 regardless of the issue.


Hmm...so Palin will support someone 15% liberal over some one 5% liberal?

Hate to break this to you....but that is not being “conservative”


130 posted on 08/19/2010 4:32:21 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD for Senate ..... jdforsenate.com. You either voting for JD, or voting for the Liberal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

No, they did not. Males voted for him,but,not men. There is a difference.


131 posted on 08/19/2010 4:33:13 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Of course it’s accurate, but that’s hardly the point of the thread anymore.


132 posted on 08/19/2010 4:33:31 PM PDT by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Don't buy into that garbage argument.

The right of a group to vote is not dependent upon that group voting this way or that way; the right of a group to vote is either right or not based upon PRINCIPLE.

“X don't vote the way I want them to, so X shouldn't have the right to vote” is not a coherent argument that requires a defense of “Well I am an X and I voted the way you wanted me to.”.

133 posted on 08/19/2010 4:34:00 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: DryFly; pissant

I guess not. Whether or not Palin’s succeeding is not as important as attacking Pissant.

Pissant, I like you, but it’s possible to have problems with Palin—as I do—without tossing out phrases that only inspire heat, not light. Just saying, not piling on.


134 posted on 08/19/2010 4:36:39 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown. -- written by Robert Towne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I have no doubts that she HOPED they could win, but again, many of her endorsements were strategic, in that even if they didn't win this time around, their conservative message got into the primary, and maybe started folks thinking more about it.

Sarah has said from the beginning that the Primaries are where the big ideas are supposed to get hashed out, but when the General election comes, to stick together to get the Republican elected.

And no, Republicans are not perfect, but having the majority gives Republicans the power in Committees, as we've seen since 2006, when the Dems took over.

135 posted on 08/19/2010 4:37:25 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

In your opinion that isn’t being conservative, unless someone, somewhere made you the final authority on what constitutes conservative. If that is the case then I bow to you oh all knowing one.


136 posted on 08/19/2010 4:37:36 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
I'm not the one who said women shouldn't vote! Plenty of women vote stupidly, as do plenty of men.

Stupidity in voting knows no gender!

137 posted on 08/19/2010 4:39:33 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You really are obsessed by her.
You’re going to need professional help
over the next TEN years.

Series!


138 posted on 08/19/2010 4:40:40 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm; pissant

Would not be surprised at all. I imagine that any likeness of Sarah is a lot better looking than whatever it was he somehow convinced or tricked not to run screaming into the dark of night from him.

139 posted on 08/19/2010 4:50:04 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sport

The same goes for women. Real women don’t vote for scumbags.


140 posted on 08/19/2010 4:51:53 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson