Posted on 08/14/2010 4:09:18 AM PDT by GonzoII
Friday August 13, 2010First Rush, then Coulter, and Now Glenn Beck ... Whats Happening?
Commentary by John-Henry Westen OReilly asked Beck, Do you believe that gay marriage is a threat to the country in any way? Beck replied, No, I don't, adding sarcastically, Will the gays come and get us? The Glenn Beck revelation comes on the heels of two other startling announcements by conservative celebrity pundits in the last couple of weeks. Earlier this week it was announced that conservative pundit Ann Coulter would headline a fundraiser for the homosexual activist group within the Republican Party, GOProud. And on July 29, although his position had been revealed before, talk radio host Rush Limbaugh again came out in favor of homosexual civil unions, while being opposed to same-sex marriage. To be fair, it must be pointed out that Beck said he was looking at the big picture and promoting faith, the answer to all such things. Moreover, he added that he was okay with gay marriage with a caveat. As long as we are not going down the road of Canada, where it now is a problem for churches to have free speech. If they can still say, hey, we oppose it, he said. But even to have suggested, as strongly as he did, that he was not opposed to gay marriage is detrimental and demonstrates a small picture approach. Beck seems like a good guy. Hes thoughtful. Hes right on many matters in the culture war. For instance, when OReilly followed up and asked if Beck thought abortion threatened the United States, Beck replied dramatically in the affirmative. Abortion is killing, its killing, youre killing someone, he said. So I thought itd be worth it to calmly and persuasively share concerns with Beck on his approach. He may not read my email, but Im sure if enough pro-family folks were to get the message to him, hed reconsider his outlook.
|
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.
” Some tend to try and use God as an excuse to turn a blind eye to that sort of thing.
Many charlatans use God to fit their scemes. Jim & Tammy Faye Bakker, on down the line.
Perhaps you are unaware of this, but it is proper etiquette to ping the person you mention in a post. Especially when you charge them with "hate" as their motive.
BTW, I've never noticed "hate" in what Darksheare has posted here or elsewhere on FR. He stands up for what he believes is right, and the chips can fall as they may.
You also say you are too busy for dealing with other "fights," but whether your recognize it or not, you seem to be doing a good job of causing "fights" right here and now on this thread.
You really ought to either grow up or get lost.
Darks has been on a myth busting mission today.
Believe it or not, I didn’t see that photo but will take your word for it. I’ve seen other pictures at different ‘parades’ though that have little innocent babes there. God help those parents when they stand before Him to give an accounting of why they allowed their innocent babies to become ‘infected’.
You’re right LJ, repentance is the only answer but even then, there’s no guarantee that God will ‘move’ or be ‘moved’ to ‘heal’ our land because we’ve been on this path since the 60’s (longer than that but the agenda really started gripping us in the 60’s after prayer was banned from our Public schools) and there has been more than enough time given to us to rectify this. And we haven’t.
What do I say when I stand before Him? My own behavior through the years has been less than stellar. ‘Ummmm I voted the right way? I protested? I took my son out of Public education Lord so that he wouldn’t be corrupted.’ Not enough because I then danced freely in the ‘World’ thinking all would be fine. I don’t think God thinks that was good enough.
I read a piece on here sometime back regarding the responsibility that each of us have for this nightmare we are living. Sadly, I can’t say my own actions didn’t contribute because I’ve indulged in the World as well; I’ve gone along just by the fact that I wasn’t pounding on doors or calling legislators as often as necessary. Always thinking ‘this too shall pass’.
Believe me though, I will fight. I’m a fighter by nature and cantankerous ... which is not a good combination. But this never ending assault on us is having a toll. I’ve started to drink again because truly, there is nothing else that dulls my senses and I’m afraid that if I ever started screaming, I won’t stop.
Sorta.
*chuckle*
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2570385/posts?page=228#228
Global called me a wanker in the above linked post simply because I wouldn’t let them continue cheerleading homomarriage.
What an idiotic statement.
Yes, the pro-homomarriage trolls and their cheerleaders didn’t like being linked to coverage of the Folsom Street Fair.
I did find it amusing to be told that I was oppressing homosexuals by not letting them marry.
Yesterday a troll said that homosexual marriage was a good clean conservative value.
And tomorrow?
Well, I’ve got a fiver on being called a bigoted jerk.
(Odds are in favor of it..)
Well, just to make it clear for the simple minded, what would that point be, again?
Good communication means making things very clear. Go right ahead, if I’m mistaken I’ll be the first to admit it!
At the point they try to make it a hate crime to denounce the sick perversion it is...or force children to accept it as normal in the schools...or take away the tax-exempt status of ONLY those churches that oppose it...that’s where I draw the line.
Ahem - we passed the first two milestones quite some time ago. You haven’t been paying attention??
Sometimes you feel like a nut sometimes you don't...
What is the "certified gay population"?
Ask your self this --what are "gay people"?
Can you define them WITHOUT discussing the disordered and unhealthy sexual acrobatics they promote, are predisposed to engage in and or choose to engage in?
Are they better designers or hair stylists, more feminine or masculine, bald, fat, speak with a lisp -what exactly?
We talk about behavior alone here...
How long will it take you to realize you have been duped by the left?
Using your logic you would have to say that 33% of all prison rapes are done by homosexuals even though 2% of the population are homosexual. The problem with that is then 66% of all prison rapes are done by heterosexuals. Enviroment and mental health, and access all are driving forces behind the huge difference in homosexual child molestation and heterosex child molestation.
Using your logic male on male sex is not homosexual unless what -one or both participants are "certified"?
AGAIN -we talk about behavior alone here. You seem to jump through hoops here to promote a concept unrooted in reason or science e.g. "gay people" and in doing so deny the reality staring you in the face...
I agree we volunteered to come to this mortal world via our rebellion (each, individually) against God. And the purpose of life is to rectify that rebellion and remember that He is our Lord.
Voluntarily surrendering to Him in loving obedience is the best use of our free will; everything else leads to suffering of the worst kind.
If this is what you meant, I am on board.
Not busy enough... if you get my drift! There are plenty on the list still. And more crawling out of the woodwork.
So, you'd certain be in favor of further perverting what marriage and extending tax and other benefits to the wives of polygamists, first cousins, siblings and fathers and their daughters than want to marry, too, right?
One of the rules or steps put together by homosexual activists in the mid or early 80s or whenever they laid their plans was to keep what they actually DO out of the public, knowing that normal people would be revolted, horrified and angry. The public should be gradually “educated”, especially the young, to de-sensitize us to the huge “revolt” factor. “Gays” were to be cast as clean cut victims of bigotry, with no mention of sex except maybe a chaste kiss or hand holding shown.
What they actually DO was to be kept hidden, when that is the only thing that makes them any different, and the only thing that makes them “gay”.
Pretty ****ing weird.
Would “certified” include licensing and bonding?
Nah, just “bondage”.
Okay, I’ve gone far enough!
I think you are right. Did you happen to catch the threads on the new 'Mecca' clock? Another prophecy fullfilled (imo). The anti-christ is backstage and waiting. After studying and listening to prophecy teachers for alot of years, the one thing I believe they are in error on is that the anti christ will come from Rome/and be a Catholic. jimho, I believe that the ac will come from the islamic faith.
Tell me about it!
Prior to that they said they were ‘bisexual’ if they mentioned sex at all.
(Freddy Mercury for example. He used that lame sidestep. People still fall for it.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.