Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2010 2:42:52 PM PDT by LA Woman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LA Woman3
Hmm. Asking to speak at another Catholic founded school after the divisive result of the Notre Dame speech. Sounds like he is trying to divide the Catholic Church in America from Rome.
2 posted on 08/11/2010 2:47:26 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

No surprise that those limp-wristed Tea-sips jumped on board to have Stroker there.

That school is a libtard indoctrination center. I’m proud and happy that neither one of my kids wanted to go to school, there.


3 posted on 08/11/2010 2:48:29 PM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

Good for them. It’s too bad they wouldn’t say they were declining because it was the right thing to do, though.


4 posted on 08/11/2010 2:49:40 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

http://www.stedwards.edu/aboutus/


5 posted on 08/11/2010 2:49:44 PM PDT by LA Woman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

Can you blame them at St Ed’s? -— Remember this gem?

“Obama White House ordered coverup of religious symbols for Georgetown speech”
April 16, 2009 | 3:39 pm

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/04/obama-notre-dame-georgetown.html


6 posted on 08/11/2010 2:49:49 PM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

A very well reasoned declination, in my opinion. It’s nice to be able to offer logical and reasonable excuses in declining the overtures of a president who is, in every way and on every day, turning out to be the most unsatisfactory chief executive in modern history.


8 posted on 08/11/2010 2:50:26 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

Only logistical. . .too bad. Some ‘moral backbone’/moral reasoning, could have been appreciated. If only. . .


9 posted on 08/11/2010 2:52:18 PM PDT by cricket (flies don't lie. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

SHOT down! Good for them.


12 posted on 08/11/2010 2:56:30 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

SHOT down! Good for them.


13 posted on 08/11/2010 2:56:52 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3
and 0bama takes another one in the...........HA ha!!!
14 posted on 08/11/2010 2:57:28 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

Let us nope the administration took this with grace.


16 posted on 08/11/2010 3:01:14 PM PDT by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

They didn’t want to hide their crosses and other symbols of Christianity to please The Won?


17 posted on 08/11/2010 3:03:30 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3
Barry had to wipe the lipstick off his behind after being "declined" so brutally.

Repulsive.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

20 posted on 08/11/2010 3:09:38 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

Rub-a-dub-dub, Obama’s had the snub.

HE SHOULD HAVE ACCEPTED GOV PERRY’S LETTER!


22 posted on 08/11/2010 3:38:04 PM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (All sweat, no equity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3
I used to think we would never see a bigger ego or bigger narcissist (person so in-love with their self) in the White House after slick Willie left office. Yet the current occupant seems to think that the country is just dieing to hear another major speech from him, where ever he goes, on what must almost be a weekly basis since he took office. I don't know which is bigger, his narcissism or his arrogance about his narcissism.
24 posted on 08/11/2010 3:45:03 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

It should be noted that St Edwards University has hosted training camp for the Dallas Cowboys in past years so it isn’t so tiny that a presidential visit is out of the question.


25 posted on 08/11/2010 3:45:54 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3
“St. Edward’s University is honored to have been considered a potential venue for President Obama’s recent visit to Austin,” said a statement issued by spokeswoman Mischelle Diaz. “Regretfully, it was not a good time for us to consider this. With the short notice provided - only 3 to 4 days - a visit of this importance and magnitude would have been difficult for a campus of our size. A presidential visit requires and deserves more resources than we were able to provide at the time.”


Couldn't they have been honest and said. "No thanks send the baby killer elsewhere we have no use for him here."

27 posted on 08/11/2010 4:08:38 PM PDT by abortionisalwaysmurder (Before you kill your baby, ask yourself, What did the baby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3

Was their closing line “Tommorow doesn’t look good, either. Perhaps the day after the Twelfth of Never might be better for all?”


30 posted on 08/11/2010 4:21:26 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
St. Edward's says no to Obama - Twice

Proctor Anderson

St. Edward's University released a statement Wednesday explaining its decision to say no to a White House request to consider the campus as the venue for President Barack Obama's speech in Austin earlier this week.

The full statement, released by university spokeswoman Mischelle Diaz, reads:

"St. Edward’s University is honored to have been considered a potential venue for President Obama’s recent visit to Austin. Regretfully, it was not a good time for us to consider this. With the short notice provided – only three to four days – a visit of this importance and magnitude would have been difficult for a campus of our size. A presidential visit requires and deserves more resources than we were able to provide at the time.

We are hard at work preparing for a new school year and it is not a good time for us to divert resources away from the needs of incoming students. Staff members are preparing residence halls, completing maintenance projects and conducting orientation sessions.

In addition, as part of our thoughtful consideration, we had to acknowledge that the vast majority of our student body, and many faculty members, would not be present to participate in a presidential visit."

Classes start on August 23 at St. Edward's and on August 25 at the University of Texas.

Diaz said that the university received an offer from Obama's staff at the end of July to visit the St. Edward’s campus on August 4 and consider it as a potential speaking venue for a speech scheduled for August 9. The school declined, citing timing issues. Obama, instead, made his speech at the University of Texas Monday as part of a fundraising swing through Austin and Dallas.

In 2007, St. Edward's turned down a request from then-candiate Obama to speak on campus.

“As a university, we are not going to accept a request from any political figure during a campaign” Diaz said, citing what she called university policy.

Last year, when it was announced that Obama would deliver the commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame and receive an honorary doctor of laws degree, some Catholics were upset, citing Obama's views on abortion and stem cell research.

An online petition circulated by the Cardinal Newman Society at NotreDameScandal.com asked Notre Dame’s president to take back the invitation.

“It is an outrage and a scandal that 'Our Lady’s University,' one of the premier Catholic universities in the United States, would bestow such an honor on President Obama given his clear support for policies and laws that directly contradict fundamental Catholic teachings on life and marriage,” the petition said.

Notre Dame's invitation remained and Obama delivered a speech at the university's commencement.

Diaz said the Notre Dame controversy and concerns among some Catholics about Obama's position on abortion and stem cell research were not reasons for the university's latest decision to pass on hosting him.

“I think a lot of people are trying to draw parallels but, as the statement says, our reasons were logistical,” she said.

St. Edward's says no to Obama - Twice
32 posted on 08/11/2010 4:37:13 PM PDT by LA Woman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LA Woman3
"not a good time for us to consider this. With the short notice provided - only 3 to 4 days - a visit of this importance and magnitude would have been difficult for a campus of our size..."

PLUS we are a Bush Country ! :o)

39 posted on 09/28/2010 12:11:28 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson