1 posted on
08/11/2010 2:42:52 PM PDT by
LA Woman3
To: LA Woman3
Hmm. Asking to speak at another Catholic founded school after the divisive result of the Notre Dame speech. Sounds like he is trying to divide the Catholic Church in America from Rome.
To: LA Woman3
No surprise that those limp-wristed Tea-sips jumped on board to have Stroker there.
That school is a libtard indoctrination center. I’m proud and happy that neither one of my kids wanted to go to school, there.
3 posted on
08/11/2010 2:48:29 PM PDT by
Howie66
(I can see November from my house.)
To: LA Woman3
Good for them. It’s too bad they wouldn’t say they were declining because it was the right thing to do, though.
4 posted on
08/11/2010 2:49:40 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: All
5 posted on
08/11/2010 2:49:44 PM PDT by
LA Woman3
To: LA Woman3
6 posted on
08/11/2010 2:49:49 PM PDT by
tflabo
To: LA Woman3
A very well reasoned declination, in my opinion. It’s nice to be able to offer logical and reasonable excuses in declining the overtures of a president who is, in every way and on every day, turning out to be the most unsatisfactory chief executive in modern history.
8 posted on
08/11/2010 2:50:26 PM PDT by
davisfh
To: LA Woman3
Only logistical. . .too bad. Some ‘moral backbone’/moral reasoning, could have been appreciated. If only. . .
9 posted on
08/11/2010 2:52:18 PM PDT by
cricket
(flies don't lie. . .)
To: LA Woman3
SHOT down! Good for them.
12 posted on
08/11/2010 2:56:30 PM PDT by
FrdmLvr
( VIVA la SB 1070!)
To: LA Woman3
SHOT down! Good for them.
13 posted on
08/11/2010 2:56:52 PM PDT by
FrdmLvr
( VIVA la SB 1070!)
To: LA Woman3
and 0bama takes another one in the...........HA ha!!!
14 posted on
08/11/2010 2:57:28 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: LA Woman3
Let us nope the administration took this with grace.
16 posted on
08/11/2010 3:01:14 PM PDT by
Paperdoll
(On the cutting edge)
To: LA Woman3
They didn’t want to hide their crosses and other symbols of Christianity to please The Won?
17 posted on
08/11/2010 3:03:30 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: LA Woman3
Barry had to wipe the lipstick off his behind after being "declined" so brutally.
Repulsive.
![](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4175015880_cea9ebed9e_m.jpg)
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
20 posted on
08/11/2010 3:09:38 PM PDT by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: LA Woman3
Rub-a-dub-dub, Obama’s had the snub.
HE SHOULD HAVE ACCEPTED GOV PERRY’S LETTER!
To: LA Woman3
I used to think we would never see a bigger ego or bigger narcissist (person so in-love with their self) in the White House after slick Willie left office. Yet the current occupant seems to think that the country is just dieing to hear another major speech from him, where ever he goes, on what must almost be a weekly basis since he took office. I don't know which is bigger, his narcissism or his arrogance about his narcissism.
24 posted on
08/11/2010 3:45:03 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: LA Woman3
It should be noted that St Edwards University has hosted training camp for the Dallas Cowboys in past years so it isn’t so tiny that a presidential visit is out of the question.
25 posted on
08/11/2010 3:45:54 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
To: LA Woman3
St. Edwards University is honored to have been considered a potential venue for President Obamas recent visit to Austin, said a statement issued by spokeswoman Mischelle Diaz. Regretfully, it was not a good time for us to consider this. With the short notice provided - only 3 to 4 days - a visit of this importance and magnitude would have been difficult for a campus of our size. A presidential visit requires and deserves more resources than we were able to provide at the time.
Couldn't they have been honest and said. "No thanks send the baby killer elsewhere we have no use for him here."
27 posted on
08/11/2010 4:08:38 PM PDT by
abortionisalwaysmurder
(Before you kill your baby, ask yourself, What did the baby do?)
To: LA Woman3
Was their closing line “Tommorow doesn’t look good, either. Perhaps the day after the Twelfth of Never might be better for all?”
30 posted on
08/11/2010 4:21:26 PM PDT by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: All
St. Edward's says no to Obama - Twice
Proctor Anderson
St. Edward's University released a statement Wednesday explaining its decision to say no to a White House request to consider the campus as the venue for President Barack Obama's speech in Austin earlier this week.
The full statement, released by university spokeswoman Mischelle Diaz, reads:
"St. Edwards University is honored to have been considered a potential venue for President Obamas recent visit to Austin. Regretfully, it was not a good time for us to consider this. With the short notice provided only three to four days a visit of this importance and magnitude would have been difficult for a campus of our size. A presidential visit requires and deserves more resources than we were able to provide at the time.
We are hard at work preparing for a new school year and it is not a good time for us to divert resources away from the needs of incoming students. Staff members are preparing residence halls, completing maintenance projects and conducting orientation sessions.
In addition, as part of our thoughtful consideration, we had to acknowledge that the vast majority of our student body, and many faculty members, would not be present to participate in a presidential visit."
Classes start on August 23 at St. Edward's and on August 25 at the University of Texas.
Diaz said that the university received an offer from Obama's staff at the end of July to visit the St. Edwards campus on August 4 and consider it as a potential speaking venue for a speech scheduled for August 9. The school declined, citing timing issues. Obama, instead, made his speech at the University of Texas Monday as part of a fundraising swing through Austin and Dallas.
In 2007, St. Edward's turned down a request from then-candiate Obama to speak on campus.
As a university, we are not going to accept a request from any political figure during a campaign Diaz said, citing what she called university policy.
Last year, when it was announced that Obama would deliver the commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame and receive an honorary doctor of laws degree, some Catholics were upset, citing Obama's views on abortion and stem cell research.
An online petition circulated by the Cardinal Newman Society at NotreDameScandal.com asked Notre Dames president to take back the invitation.
It is an outrage and a scandal that 'Our Ladys University,' one of the premier Catholic universities in the United States, would bestow such an honor on President Obama given his clear support for policies and laws that directly contradict fundamental Catholic teachings on life and marriage, the petition said.
Notre Dame's invitation remained and Obama delivered a speech at the university's commencement.
Diaz said the Notre Dame controversy and concerns among some Catholics about Obama's position on abortion and stem cell research were not reasons for the university's latest decision to pass on hosting him.
I think a lot of people are trying to draw parallels but, as the statement says, our reasons were logistical, she said.
St. Edward's says no to Obama - Twice
To: LA Woman3
"not a good time for us to consider this. With the short notice provided - only 3 to 4 days - a visit of this importance and magnitude would have been difficult for a campus of our size..."
PLUS we are a Bush Country ! :o)
39 posted on
09/28/2010 12:11:28 PM PDT by
traumer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson