Skip to comments.
Palin: Obama lacks 'the cojones' to tackle immigration
The Washington Post ^
| August, 2010
| Matt DeLong
Posted on 08/02/2010 9:11:43 AM PDT by yoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Sarah is right about the lack of cojones but she failed to mention his lack of honoring his oath of office - the one he took as the incoming president where he
swears he will protect both our Constitution and the NationWhen a United States President fails to protect either Constitution or the nation, he must either step down or be impeached. He must let someone who will protect the nation and the constitution take his place. Fat chance this Marxist will ever leave........
1
posted on
08/02/2010 9:11:45 AM PDT
by
yoe
To: yoe
the truth is spoken the problem is that we have republicans like Karl Rove saying that the comment was tasteless and many in the GOP have no balls what so ever.
The GOP had better get some balls as of right now it is just a handful of women who have the guts to say the truth and staying silent or being PC is playing into he far lefts agenda
2
posted on
08/02/2010 9:14:00 AM PDT
by
manc
(WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
To: yoe
the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest America
3
posted on
08/02/2010 9:14:43 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
To: yoe
the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans At what point are these Jourolist propaganda whores in the Establishment Media finally going to wake up that it is this sort of mindless regurgitation of Democrat National Committee propaganda that makes them laughing stocks to average Americans?
The Bush tax cuts effected ALL Americans. To claim they only effected the "wealthiest Americans" is a out right lie.
4
posted on
08/02/2010 9:15:52 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
To: manc
“women who have the guts to say the truth ...”
IMO, it was still a distasteful way for Palin to get the point across.
5
posted on
08/02/2010 9:17:19 AM PDT
by
hoe_cake
( Society of the Descendents of the Signers of the Constitution)
To: yoe
6
posted on
08/02/2010 9:17:48 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
To: FrankR
I'm stealing that.
7
posted on
08/02/2010 9:19:06 AM PDT
by
TornadoAlley3
(Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
To: yoe
OK, some of you may prefer another candidate or even feel that Palin is not presidential material, but you HAVE to agree with this, yes?
8
posted on
08/02/2010 9:19:30 AM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die. - Samuel Adams)
To: yoe
This needs to be the 2010/2012 slogan: ¡CAJONES!
9
posted on
08/02/2010 9:20:00 AM PDT
by
GOPyouth
(¡Cajones!)
To: yoe
I was a little surprised when I heard that come out of her mouth. I love Sarah (See my tagline), but, stuff like that makes people feel like she does not have the "Social Graces" to be President.
10
posted on
08/02/2010 9:20:24 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Christie in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
To: hoe_cake
Yeah God forbid the Republicans ever fight back.
Funny how certain Freepers never ever get upset when anyone on the Right is trashed in the most offensive terms.
Apparently the only time they get offended is when anyone on our side fights back against the DC Media slime machine.
11
posted on
08/02/2010 9:20:56 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
To: manc
the truth is spoken the problem is that we have republicans like Karl Rove saying that the comment was tasteless and many in the GOP have no balls what so ever. Karl said that?
Jeez! And just when you think the GOP cannot become any more spineless than it already is...
To: no dems
Yeah God forbid the Republicans ever fight back.
Funny how certain Freepers never ever get upset when anyone on the Right is trashed in the most offensive terms.
Apparently the only time they get offended is when anyone on our side fights back against the DC Media slime machine.
13
posted on
08/02/2010 9:21:38 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
To: Psalm 144
I agree. And I think that Sarah, should she decide to run in 2012, will win the GOP nomination. I really do.
14
posted on
08/02/2010 9:22:32 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Christie in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
To: yoe
I don't need "cojones" anymore.....
To: MNJohnnie
I’m not suggesting Palin not fight back, just that she do it in a dignified manner.
There’s GOT to be a more intellectual way to say the man has no balls, but for the life of me I can’t think of it.
16
posted on
08/02/2010 9:24:14 AM PDT
by
hoe_cake
( Society of the Descendents of the Signers of the Constitution)
To: MNJohnnie
It is a perversion of the truth to be sure.
The tax cuts benefitted those who pay taxes (which the “poor” do not) and it benefitted those who pay the most taxes the most.
The tax cuts were JUST. But they did not benefit the non-taxpayer, ie, the democRat base.
17
posted on
08/02/2010 9:25:19 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: no dems
I was a little surprised when I heard that come out of her mouth. I love Sarah (See my tagline), but, stuff like that makes people feel like she does not have the “Social Graces” to be President.
***************
I prefer this to Ford/Carter/Dole style restraint.
Reagan was able to make his points without being coarse (usually), but we do have a more primitive body politic these days. Successful communication to this electorate I think requires that statements be blunt, short and memorable.
I preferred reading William F. Buckley in the old National Review, but both are gone. If we will ever see such days again, we must win the present trenchfight by any means which are effective.
18
posted on
08/02/2010 9:28:03 AM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die. - Samuel Adams)
To: MNJohnnie
Hey MNJohnnie, chill out Bro. We're on the same team here.
I love Sarah; I'd vote for her tomorrow. I'm just saying that stuff like that can hurt her when the average American is choosing a President. I would have loved it if she'd said: "Barack Obama is a rotten, little, Marxist, faggot piece of s*** ". But, that would have cost her any chance of ever being elected President of the United States.
19
posted on
08/02/2010 9:29:05 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Christie in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
To: manc
If Sarah had said an equally rough comment in favor of illegal immigration, Rove would have praised her. Rove is all in for the illegals, and that is why he cried.
20
posted on
08/02/2010 9:29:07 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(In the White House the mighty White House the Liar sleeps tonight.............)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson