Posted on 07/28/2010 12:55:45 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
PHOENIX (AP) - Gov. Jan Brewer says it's just a "bump in the road" that a federal judge blocked key parts of Arizona's immigration enforcement law from taking effect Thursday.
Brewer says she's disappointed by the ruling.
But she notes that it doesn't block a provision barring local governments from restricting the enforcement of federal immigration laws.
Brewer says the fight isn't over and that the state will soon appeal Judge Susan Bolton's ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
In Brewer's words, "this fight is far from over."
(Excerpt) Read more at knx1070.com ...
Arizona should swear in a calvary posse and ride down the illegals and put a bounty on them.
Is this a “ruling” or just a temporary injunction - I hear different stories.
She'll beats him by 20 pts or more.
I wonder how many other federal laws are currently being enforced by the states? There has to be quite a few from bank robbery to drug trafficking. Perhaps this ruling should be fully applied and the states should simply leave enforcement to the feds. If its a violation of the supremacy clause to enforce this statute, then it would be a similar violation to enforce all other co-concurrent statutes.
It’s temporary. But the final ruling? Will be the same.
Then it goes to the 9th Circuit. Then the Supreme Court.
Then the streets.
United States v. Arizona — How 'Bout United States v. Rhode Island?
Good Advice!
As a 30+ year resident of AZ I can tell you that most
Arizona Citizens have learned to ignore the Feds a long
time ago.
The people of Arizona have ways of getting things done.
Be sure to vote in November.
Obama is just a flash in the pan. Everything he thinks he's getting done will be rescinded and repealed.
I think her confirmation 10/3/2000 was by unanimous consent. At least the Congressional record reports it mentioning any vote. Thus JD can try to tie the judge’s decision to McCain confirming her. Dang rulling class always wants the credit, but never the responsibility for their actions. Tar them together, JD, and let the voters bring the feathers.
.
What AZ is doing is known as concurrent enforcement: a person can only be guilty under state law if guilty under the federal law.
Correctly, the Lefty black-robed clowns at the 9th Circus Court of Appeals – the most overturned court in the system got it right and has gone along with that concept.
1st Circuit Court of Appeals - Estrada v. Rhode Island upheld Rhode Island procedures, reasoning that, in Muehler v. Mena, the Supreme Court “held that a police officer does not need independent reasonable suspicion to question an individual about her immigration status…”
And the USSC - De Canas v. Bica (1976): States may enact legislation to discourage illegal immigration within their jurisdictions.
Goddard's a DemocRAT - what else would you expect him to say? And, since you haven't been following this issue too carefully, let me enlighten you: Brewer's a she, not a he.
I think most of those charges against George III hold against Barack Hussein I.
I KNOW what Sam Adams would be thinking right about now.
We need more people like him.
Fits like a velvet glove...
.
“No final verdict has been issued. And even when it is issued, it will be appealed and bumped to to the 9th circus.”
Bingo. Brewer must be stunned by the lack of judicial objectivity here, and she apparently knows little about the 9th Circus.
Love those quotes on your homepage.
Specially the one from the Marines.
I hope he is humiliated in defeat.
Who is the 'he' I'm referring to?
Hint: The answer is the subject. Referred to in the previous sentence.
Brawling Brewer will Battle in a Cage Match in the 9th Circus then onto the SCOTUS
The appeal will force the real showdown.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.