Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Judge Rules on Arizona Immigration Law

Posted on 07/28/2010 10:19:57 AM PDT by God luvs America

strikes down the portion of officials demanding papers from immigrants....no word yet if she has decided this law trumps fed law but she has not struck down entire law...

info is coming in on Fox...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arizona; comeonin; dnc4openborders; dnc4terrorists; dncmavslittlepeople; elections; enemydomestic; holder4terrorists; judiciary4dnc; judiciary4invasion; judiciary4terrorists; judiciaryvsamerica; obama; obama4terrorists; obamavslittlepeople; openborders; sb1070
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-257 next last
To: God luvs America

Did anyone expect anything different? Really, the rule is simple, a democrat appointed judge will ALWAYS throw the constitution out the door and rule based on politics.

You want to truly restore the constitution in this oountry. It starts with judicial reform. I propose a constitutional amendment that clearly defines the role of the judiciary and makes strict constructionism the law of the land and ignoring it an impeachable offense.


41 posted on 07/28/2010 10:28:34 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Independent

As the AZ law goes so does our country....GOD I’M SO ANGRY AND SICK OF IT!!


42 posted on 07/28/2010 10:28:40 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

lol ya the illegal part ...cannot determine immigrations status..in other words ...We cannot expect protection from the Federal government

Illegals have all the right. we have none


43 posted on 07/28/2010 10:28:47 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

Originally the thread didn’t permit replies for some reason. I know because I tried to reply and there was no reply box available. I guess the mods fixed it. Good on them.


44 posted on 07/28/2010 10:29:06 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
Police can't ask about their immigration status.
45 posted on 07/28/2010 10:29:34 AM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw

federal law REQUIRES them to carry their legal status papers. The ONLY nation not so required is Canada.

So they should be able to be asked under federal law.


46 posted on 07/28/2010 10:29:38 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Halls

“9th circus”.. I like that.. LOL..

I can’t wait til this reaches the SC. I think we have a 5-4 there.


47 posted on 07/28/2010 10:29:40 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Reality vs. Myth: SB1070

Make it illegal in the State of Arizona for an alien to not register with the government, thus being an “illegal alien” (already the case at the federal level: 8 USC 1306a; USC 1304e)

Allow police to detain people where there is a “reasonable suspicion” that they’re illegal aliens (see the recent court case Estrada v. Rhode Island for an idea of what “reasonable suspicion” might entail)

Prohibits sanctuary cities (already prohibited at the federal level, 8 USC 1373) and allows citizens to sue any such jurisdiction

Reality vs. Myth: SB1070

Myth No. 1: The law requires aliens to carry identification that they weren’t already required to carry.

Reality: It has been a federal crime (8 United States Code Section 1304(a) or 1306(e)) since 1940 for aliens to fail to carry their registration documents. The Arizona law reaffirms the federal law. Anyone who has traveled abroad knows that other nations have similar requirements. The majority requests for documentation will take place during the course of other police business such as traffic stops. Because Arizona allows only lawful residents to obtain licenses, an officer must presume that someone who produces one is legally in the country. (See News Hour clip 3:45 seconds in)

Myth No. 2: The law will encourage racial profiling.

Reality: The Arizona law reduces the chances of racial profiling by requiring officers to contact the federal government when they suspect a person is an illegal alien as opposed to letting them make arrests on their own assessment as federal law currently allows. Section 2 was amended (by HB2162) to read that a law enforcement official “may not consider race, color, or national origin” in making any stops or determining an alien’s immigration status (previously, they were prohibited in “solely” considering those factors). In addition, all of the normal Fourth Amendment protections against racial profiling still apply.

Myth No. 3: “Reasonable suspicion” is a meaningless term that will permit police misconduct.

Reality: “Reasonable suspicion” has been defined by the courts for decades (the Fourth Amendment itself proscribes “unreasonable searches and seizures”). One of the most recent cases, Estrada v. Rhode Island, provides an example of the courts refining of “reasonable suspicion:”

A 15 passenger van is pulled over for a traffic violation. The driver of the van had identification but the other passengers did not (some had IDs from a gym membership, a non-driver’s license card from the state, and IDs issued from the Guatemalan Consulate). The passengers said they were on their way to work but they had no work permits. Most could not speak English but upon questioning, admitted that they were in the United States illegally. The officer notified ICE and waited three minutes for instructions.

The SB1070 provision in question reads:
“For any lawful contact made by a law enforcement official or agency of this state . . . where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made, when practicable, to determine the immigration status of the person.”

Myth No. 4: The law will require Arizona police officers to stop and question people.

Reality: The law only kicks in when a police officer stopped, detained, or arrested someone (HB2162). The most likely contact is during the issuance of a speeding ticket. The law does not require the officer to begin questioning a person about his immigration status or to do anything the officer would not otherwise do.

Only after a stop is made, and subsequently the officer develops reasonable suspicion on his own that an immigration law has been violated, is any obligation imposed. At that point, the officer is required to call ICE to confirm whether the person is an illegal alien.

The Arizona law is actually more restrictive than federal law. In Muehler v. Mena (2005), the Supreme Court ruled that officers did not need reasonable suspicion to justify asking a suspect about their immigration status, stating that the court has “held repeatedly that mere police questioning does not constitute a seizure” under the Fourth Amendment).

Source = http://www.numbersusa.com/dfax?jid=475466&lid=9&rid=123&series=tp06MAY10&tid=999725


48 posted on 07/28/2010 10:29:40 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

I am sick to my stomach. This is disgusting. Now I am 100% positive that something tragic is going down here in Arizona before the elections, and it will be blamed on this.


49 posted on 07/28/2010 10:29:55 AM PDT by derekr44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

this is what we will get with kagan


50 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:02 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Legal analyst on Fox is rambling, but they have said at least once that Arizona cannot require law enforcement to inquire as to immigration status, but not sure they are prohibited from inquiring.

Lots of rambling without getting to the practical effect.


51 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:04 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

This administration is in derilection of duty. There are no words of curse that are appropriate enough to encapsulate the arrogance, tyranny and elitism found in Obama, the WH and all his agencies. Hitler would be proud of Obama’s capabilities in securing one of the most totalitarian US governments in the history of the country.

God Help Us!


52 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:24 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Patrick Henry and Joe Wilson...Patriots past and present!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shaka

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100728/ap_on_re_us/us_arizona_immigration


53 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:24 AM PDT by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Remember in November.


54 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:24 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

“Opponents say the law will lead to racial profiling and is trumped by federal immigration law.”

It’s the same g#@damn law!

#$@$^& crooks!


55 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:32 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Iran doesnt have a 2nd admendment. Ya see how that turned out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
Susan Bolton is a federal judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. She joined the court in 2000 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton.

http://judgepedia.org/index.php/Susan_Bolton

56 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:32 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

arm yourselves ....illegals have been empowered.


57 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:37 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

I guess there’s no need to carry my drivers license around anymore!


58 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:38 AM PDT by stylecouncilor (What Would Jim Thompson Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Arizona should stop determining IRS orders and all other Federal issues.


59 posted on 07/28/2010 10:30:55 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
I'll be curious to see if the Arizona legislature spits or swallows this ruling.

60 posted on 07/28/2010 10:31:00 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 - barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-257 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson