Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry - A One-Man 'Benedict Arnold' Corporation
Wall Street Journal ^ | July27,2010 | John Fund

Posted on 07/27/2010 9:07:19 AM PDT by Hojczyk

"Let's not get silly here." That was Senator John Kerry's response Friday to questions about his new $7 million yacht, Isabel, which last week was berthed in Rhode Island rather than in Mr. Kerry's home state of Massachusetts. In doing so, Mr. Kerry will save almost $500,000 a year in taxes.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carboncredits; carboncreditscheme; dor4unothim; johnkerry; notaxes4dnc; notaxes4kerry; notaxes4rangel; nottooswiftboat; taxevasion; theytaxdontpay; yacht
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: dalereed
I wouldn't count on that assumption, there are a few states that cover their back on this one. I am not sure that MA is, but you never know.
21 posted on 07/27/2010 11:07:24 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Oh come now, the issue is not a US Senator avoiding his home state’s taxes

it is an issue of HUGE HYPOCRISY about a liberal who has spent decades showboating on passing populist legislation and developing govt programs that tax away our income to help the “unfortunate”- while hoarding his own fortune.
What ARE his principles, anyway?

And if Massachusetts wanted to drop its own boat taxes and become like Rhode Island, would liberals like Kerry support it? UNLIKELY


22 posted on 07/27/2010 11:07:49 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

the boat is owned by an LLC incorporated in Pittsburgh PA- Heinz country

Probably more tax dodges

“Not His”- Kerry just is in control and has full use
Teresa obviously indulges her boy-toy’s hobby of collecting expensive boats, it’s cheaper and less embarrassing than the hobby of John Edwards


23 posted on 07/27/2010 11:11:19 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

state Department of Revenue spokesguy Bob Bliss confirmed the senator “is under no obligation to pay the commonwealth sales tax.”

AND

However, according to Bliss, if Kerry berths the Isabel in Massachusetts waters within six months of purchasing the boat, there’s a “presumption of use” and the Heinz-Kerrys would have to walk the plank and pony up to the Bay State. After six months, should the boat change its berth to, say, Nantucket, then it’s up to the state to go after them for the taxes, Bliss added.

THE YACHT WAS DOCKED IN NANTUCKET IN EARLY JULY


24 posted on 07/27/2010 11:16:33 AM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: free me

Here in CA we have similar rules. In Mexico there is what is called the 91 day yacht club. After you buy a boat it stays there for 91 days and comes in without the huge tax burden.


25 posted on 07/27/2010 11:19:01 AM PDT by edcoil (There has got to be a better way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
From the article:
"No, but there's a smell of hypocrisy. In addition to sailing around the tax issue, Mr. Kerry chose to build his boat in New Zealand at a time when Bay State boat builders are having trouble keeping their work force employed. "I'm confident that anything constructed in New Zealand could be constructed here in the state," Gregory Egan, who owns the Crosby Yacht Yard in Osterville, told the Boston Herald. Others noted that the Isabel was specially designed to be piloted without a crew -- letting Mr. Kerry scrimp on employment costs and payroll taxes."

Because Massachusetts has decided to grant a lot of social services like health care, they have high taxes. They think that this helps the impoverished. However, because of these high taxes, jobs are moved somewhere else, like New Zealand. This means that countless local jobs are destroyed or just not created by Massachusetts' tax policy. Kerry has done us a favor by giving us a perfect, real world example of why government spending and taxes hurts the impoverished, rather than helps them.
26 posted on 07/27/2010 11:21:10 AM PDT by bravedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shiva
" . . . but I would do the same thing in his shoes"

Does that make it right?

Kerry is a Tax n' Spend Democrat. It is hypocritical of him to avoid taxes. We FReepers on the other hand, oppose outrageous taxes. We are simply practicing what we preach when we legally avoid taxes. I mean how high are the taxes in Mass when he would pay Five Hundred Thousand dollars per year to keep his yot there?

27 posted on 07/27/2010 11:23:31 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bravedog

In addition to sailing around the tax issue, Mr. Kerry chose to build his boat in New Zealand at a time when Bay State boat builders are having trouble keeping their work force employed. “I’m confident that anything constructed in New Zealand could be constructed here in the state,” Gregory Egan, who owns the Crosby Yacht Yard in Osterville, told the Boston Herald. Others noted that the Isabel was specially designed to be piloted without a crew — letting Mr. Kerry scrimp on employment costs and payroll taxes.


28 posted on 07/27/2010 11:24:34 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Maybe PA should go after 6%.

In any event, MA has a use tax, and folks are supposed to pay sales tax they buy goods outside the state, such as NH, where there is no sales tax. Kerry bought a boat, Kerry Lives in MA. Kerry owes a use tax in MA.

As far as that corporation in PA is concerned, I wonder if that boat is being treated as a legitimate business expense.

Frig it all, Eat the rich!


29 posted on 07/27/2010 11:26:08 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
can’t stand Kerry at all but would do the same thing if I were in his shoes.

Hopefully you mean avoiding the taxes as opposed to imposing. It's not that Kerry tried to avoid paying taxes, it's that he SUPPORTED those taxes that he is unwilling to pay.

30 posted on 07/27/2010 11:27:20 AM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: King Moonracer

Come to think of it, that’s probably the angle

Take Heinz execs and other corporatists and lobbyists out sailing once in a while and Teresa Heinz’s holding company/trust or whatsever they call it- can write off the yacht as a business expense. Surely Lurch is a director or legislative advisor or somesuch, all he has to do is take a briefcase of documents to “review” every time he goes sailing..... and it’s business travel

maybe Tereza didn’t buy it just out of love for Lurch


31 posted on 07/27/2010 11:33:09 AM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

“Anyone that doesn’t use all legal means to avoid taxes is either stupid or a fool!”

I completely agree..... although I despise Kerry and wish him the very worst in everything.

I purchased an Airstream trailer in Oregon this past April. I was forced to pay over $6K, a bit over 8% of the sale price, in Washington state taxes just to be able to license it. When it comes to taxes, Washington sate has gone the extra mile in screwing it’s citizens.

In this state, there is no legal way out of this. There are extremely heavy fines and legal action that WILL be imposed against anyone violating the relevant laws.

I wonder if there are similar laws that could be used against Traitor Kerry.


32 posted on 07/27/2010 11:56:12 AM PDT by Gator113 (God save the Republic.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Yeah, but only by mistake.


33 posted on 07/27/2010 12:03:26 PM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Mass loses one, possibly two, congressional districts after this census, so opportunities for Mass dems are shrinking..I suspect that as his poll numbers worsen, he will face a primary next time he runs..


34 posted on 07/27/2010 12:04:20 PM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
>while taxing/taking from the not rich high wage earners, thus blocking them from ever achieving personal wealth.

from my home page:

taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.

35 posted on 07/27/2010 12:07:41 PM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: free me

I thought the yacht was called “The Big Pickle”.


36 posted on 07/27/2010 12:10:04 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Deb

LOl!


37 posted on 07/27/2010 12:11:41 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

That is a truism!


38 posted on 07/27/2010 12:17:23 PM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Before Reagan screwed us with the “Tax Simplification Act”, the biggest tax increase in history, I didn’t pay one cent in taxes from 1978, the year I smartened up, until 1990.

In 1978 when I had to write a check to the IRS for $28k I got into the tax code and figured out how to not pay taxes.

The 86 tax change that Reagan signed eliminated all the “loopholes” that were available.

In 1980 when I bought my airplane I not only avoided the sales tax of over $10k by using it commercially for over one half of the hours in the first year but using depreciation and 10% investment credit plus income averaging that year the government paid me $4,300 to earn $120k.


39 posted on 07/27/2010 12:17:40 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"Let's not get silly here." “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

"You know it's a dumb question... It just shows what happened to a channel that did have some respect."

-PJ

40 posted on 07/27/2010 12:27:32 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson